Home | News    Saturday 4 August 2012

Sudan confirms oil agreement with South Sudan

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

August 4, 2012 (KHARTOUM) - Sudanese negotiating team confirmed that they reached an agreement on oil transportation fees but did not provide further details.

JPEG - 23.3 kb
Mutrif Sidiq, spokesperson of Sudan negotiating team (SUNA)

The agreement includes the pipeline, marine terminal, processing and transit fees.

Mutrif Sidiq, spokesperson of the government delegation in Addis Ababa told SUNA that the two parties have reached "reasonable" understanding on oil issue yesterday.

He added the agreement does not satisfy the ambition of both parties, stressing that it will be implemented once an agreement on the security arrangement is reached.

Sudanese media say South Sudan agreed to pay $25.80 per barrel, but there is no confirmation from the mediation or the two parties.

Juba shut down oil production last January after accusing Sudan of stealing its crude. The resumption of oil exportation needs some months of preparations oil experts say.

The talks will resume, according to Mutrif, after Eid al-Fitr within three weeks.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 4 August 2012 09:06, by Anti-traitors!

    Don’t by shy fake arabs. Says it loud and clear!

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 09:36, by omoni jr.

      Mohammed Ali.
      you always SPLM are thief/thives...
      why did you steal our oil?
      Islam forbid steal and is always subjecting to cutting hands or leg in which he/she grabbed that property..

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 13:56, by mohammed ali

        Omoni, that is a lie!You didn’t pay fees for oil transport, we were forced to take our dues from the oil passing through us.We took excately what we demanded.Your thieves were not able to pay for the port fees, because they have stolen all the money!Not only Islam forbid stealing, but every civilized human being will not allow himself to steal whether it is cattle rustling or $ 12 billons from gov

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 14:02, by mohammed ali

          con: What is buzzling me is why you defend the thieves? In only 2 years they have stolen $ 4 BILLION , that means an average of $ 2 BILLIONS per year, in 6 years IT IS A STAGGERING $ 12 BILLIONS.They have stolen this money leaving more than 50% of the pple they claimed to have liberated hungry & starving.What a shame! It is still more shamful to defend them; unless you are getting your fair share

          repondre message

          • 5 August 2012 01:00, by Hardball

            Ali, N. Sudanese and darkangel, you guys need to celebrate when this fake deal actually happened. Are you guys really celebrating on the assertion of “he said they said” we know how desperate you are for South Sudan oil; but we were not expecting you to be desperate this badly! How sad!

            repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 17:38, by panom lualbil

        OMONJI JR?

        We are embarassed becoz you’re ONLY iliterate and stupid southerners on this forum. Your ENGLISH is unreadable and nobody would bother himself to read it. But if I guess, maybe you meant $25 per barrel charged by KHARTOUM, was a new deal for S Sudan. Fool, do you know how much we should pay if ratify Internationally? What tribe do you belong so I would tell them to discard you here

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 19:45, by Mi diit

          Very bad oil deal. We have been cheated a lot by Khartoum. Kiir should not have given in secretly. We have also set a bad precedence in dealing with Kenya and Djiboti oil pipelines.

          repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 21:49, by omoni jr.

          Panom lualbil
          HAHAHAHAH
          HAHAHAHAHH,
          I was not paying attention man,kinda tired that is you did not see me comments in all articles.so do not it personal and insulted me for nothing,mistake is mistake,Not body is perfect,that is why you see the SPLA/M military intellegent is behind the Bars in juba correction and detention ceneter.

          repondre message

      • 5 August 2012 04:56, by Chol

        Do Sudanese really think South Sudanese are that stupid to pay $ 36.00, $ 32.00, $ 28.00, $ 15.00, $ 9.00, transit fees per barrel or whatever the price they throw around? By the way, what country in the history of the world trade is paying any of those prices? Even in the United States where the dollar is made cannot transit a single barrel for any of that cost!

        repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 09:44, by Darkangel

      DID YOU HEAR THAT $25.80 - NOT $0.60

      I told you you would be wiggling you tails when Clinton comes. Your masters have spoken, and these are the results. She didnt even take 1 hour to tell Kiir what to do. NOW she needs to tell you to stop supporting rebels and peace will prevail !!

      She told You to forget about your old hatred and racism and think of survival !

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 10:00, by omoni jr.

        Dark-Devil or Dark-ass.
        listen here,where is 36 or 32 that criminal party wanted?
        south sudanese are more smarter than you pigs,
        And we are Not racists,Black Arabs are racists in sudan.

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 11:52, by Northern Sudanese

          omoni jr

          you lost more

          36-25= $11 (north)
          25.80-0.60 = 25.20 (south)

          so we won :D

          repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 14:58, by mohammed ali

          Omoni,who is racist? Now who is bringing race or colour? Who is using profani & filthy language!Forget about us the jalabba, mandicourrow, fake Arabs or whatever you call us; you treat yourselves only along tribal and subtribal lines even to the degree of elimination & killing because you are from a different clan.You are tribe " A" you’re good, tribe " B" you’re bad! 21st centurey,are we there?

          repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 10:08, by Observer

        Dark Angel,
        The only media that is reporting $25.80 is the Khartoum media- all the rest are reporting $15 per barrel.
        And maybe you haven’t been told what Clinton told our FM Kharti- why do you think our Govt has made these concessions.
        By the way you were another one who said there would be no oil flowing at less than $36 per barrel.
        Changed your mind now have you??

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 11:54, by Northern Sudanese

          Observer

          those media’s don’t know whats happening , Khartoum media gets the news from its officials inside the talking rooms!

          the other medias get it from unknown sources! so here you are!

          $25.80 p/b

          repondre message

          • 4 August 2012 17:07, by South South

            Northern Sudanese,

            It is $ 9.48 per barrel. Penguins can not get more than that. Eat meat now. $ 9.48 per barrel.

            repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 15:05, by mohammed ali

          Observer, or lier? told " our" FM Kharti?! Since when he is yours? You are simply lying. You are not from Sudan. By the way Mr.Sudanese he is no Kharti , he is Karti. Clinton clearly said she is coming to SS to encourage them to negotiate seriously, that being said diplomatically!Face to face, behind closed doors , they have been told to listen with a sharp finger pointing....CON

          repondre message

          • 4 August 2012 15:14, by mohammed ali

            con:Clinton did this because by September they wont be a single dollar in SS treasury.She had to come down to threaten the thieves that they will face international justice for stealing $ 12 Billions from the poor, starving & marginalized pple of SS.They know their bank details and their families abroad as well; listen or otherwise...!So, they listened & jumped from 0.6 to 25 or 15! What a leap!

            repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 15:45, by mohammed ali

          Observer, read this carefully"This is a delicate moment. It is a difficult period. We need to get those resources flowing again," Clinton told journalists at a press briefing. "A percentage of something is better than a percentage of nothing," she stressed))Do you understand this!Does it go through your thick brain. Stop lying, Mr.S.Sudanese.Be proud of your origin, no need to conceal or hide it !

          repondre message

          • 5 August 2012 01:58, by Observer

            M Ali,

            You are such an idiot.
            I am NOT South Sudanese.
            I live and work in Khartoum and have a Sudanese passport-so what else do you need for me to prove that I am not what you call me.
            Just remember that not all of us Northerners are blind followers of your employer.

            You forgot to include what Clinton said to Kharti on the phone. The same message as she gave S Sudan.
            Google it if you wish.

            repondre message

            • 5 August 2012 04:19, by mohammed ali

              Observer, you said yourself that you are SS, Mr.Intelligent.No Sudanese say Kharti, those who donnot speak Arabic say Kharti!We donnot call ourselves Northerners , we call ourselves Sudanese.What kind of a proof you need that you are a lier? That you oppose the interest of Sudan , is it a proof for your patriotism? Oh , you are telling me about your passport; I have seen it!Yet, you call me idot!

              repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 10:16, by Ayman fadul

        maybe you r right it takes a short visit from Clinton to convince or to order GOSS to compromise but at least she imposed on herself a visit, which means a bit of talks, for you NCP it takes a Phone call to obey and in some rumor it was a sms!!

        repondre message

      • 5 August 2012 05:04, by Chol

        Darkangel, reserve your happiness, you need to do that when you actually see these cash going into your central Bank. If I were you, I would do that!

        repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 10:00, by Dako

      South Sudan negotiators are shy to announce a bad deal to the nation. But the truth will come out no matter how long they are going to hide.

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 10:35, by Gabriel KK

        You are right Daka, they are covering thier faces in shame.

        repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 10:55, by Sudan virus

        Dako

        Amun said $15 dollars.

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 12:45, by Gabriel KK

          Yes $15 per a barrel is a better deal but we are still losers. for a spirit of compromise and brotherhood, it is better that way.

          repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 16:39, by Johndumo14

      south sudan to agree $26 per barrel is like sharing the oil 50/50. why should south sudan agree this amount ? The international price is not even $one dollar.One barrel costs $75 in world MKhartoum have stollen billion of dollars and still stealing oil in Hegelig and still want $26 dollars from each barrel.I thing south sudan needs a new government ,because they are giving every things to khartou

      repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 09:38, by Ayman fadul

    WOW GODA
    you know Y because of the despair this pathetic opposition forces will feel after hearing this news

    they fail to convince the people of Sudan of the importance of freedom & democracy, fail to show them how this regime is repressing ,killing their bro’s all over margins of Sudan
    instead, they want to take advantage of the recession betting on the hungry mob
    how could they be more miserabl

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 10:05, by philipdit wol

    Mutirf Sidiq, agreement is agreement there is no need for security reason to interfere with the pending issues. You NCP parties are ever like that with false accusation.

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 10:30, by wdalbalad1

    wow wow 25.8$ per barrel
    well done our negotation team
    well done Mrs H Clinton the real representative for S S government.
    Mrs H Clinton monitoring ongoing talk in addis ababa when the both parties failed to compromises all outstanding issues dut to delibrate aim of SS gov to fail the talk, then H Clinton went to juba an instructed kiir to sign agreement with sudan to save S S people from hunger

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 10:40, by Ayman fadul

      get lost..kooz!!
      u may fooled some of us before..but not anymore.. not anymore..thieves

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 15:21, by mohammed ali

        Ayman, you don’t to be fooled, because you are already a fool!There is a huge difference between national interest & partizan politics. Only fools mix this issue miserably!

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 20:00, by Ayman fadul

          Mohamed Ali
          your one-sided thinking makes it too difficult 2 u 2 understand how ur adversary see things you think i look at SS as a foe and at u as a lover just becoz u r my compatriot!
          look miserable mental retard kooz, a foolish fellow is as much dangerous as any adversary & maybe worst
          only obstacle stands on de way 2 de prosperity of de two Sudan is simply YOU
          no zis & save ur profound advices

          repondre message

          • 5 August 2012 04:38, by mohammed ali

            Ayman, oh , does it mean you are looking " 2- sided" when you you wish your country bad! I don’t look at and I don’t want to look at SS as foe; but unfortunately they look at you as jalabbi, fake Arab, mandikorrow...bla..bla.Don’t love me, love yourself, pple & country.That you write in a gibbrish way doesn’t make better than any normal Sudanese!

            repondre message

            • 5 August 2012 08:39, by Ayman fadul

              Moh Ali
              it’s unblivably bewildering how a model of corruption,dishonesty & treason mange to claim such integrity

              de last one who could give a hint about patriotism is u
              don’t try to finger point anyone as an enemy 4 u r de real enemy of Sudan

              look wat u’v don?war is all over Sudan, the only language u r freaking good at,is kilin,raping &oppressing.

              & by de way ur racial words r functionless

              repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 10:53, by solider

    observer. it is 25$ per barrel , plus unknown amount of oil will be looted just like before. this deal is extreemly good for the north

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 11:02, by Observer

      Oh really??? Let us see about the price.
      Were you there in the negotiation room??
      And as I am a Sudanese, I take no pride in your boasting about us looting the oil- we all know what our Govt did. You don;t need to make it public.

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 11:38, by Kurnyel

        Yes or No? La wala Nam? deal or no deal? the stupids people of South Sudan have ran out of cash, the black idoit people of S. Sudan their road came to an end. fuck you why did you wasted your time by shuting down oil? why did you killed your poor equips soldiers in Hiligic? you are cust to death, all evils wishes must kill Kiir and his vice president Machar.

        repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 13:05, by Northern Sudanese

        Observer

        you don’t fool northerners, you only fool yourself!

        sudan media gets the news from inside the rooms from officials, other media’s get it from unknown sources!

        its $25.80 for north!

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 15:14, by zulu

          Northern Sudanese,
          what did you just say, not to fool nothern sudanese, or the fake arabs to be specific? your government had given pre-conditions, ie security first. where is it now, if you the fake arabs cannot be fooled and still fool yourselves to believe you are an arab of a darker skin?
          just believe what your patrons tell you and the rest take things at face value

          repondre message

          • 4 August 2012 15:34, by mohammed ali

            Zulu, your problem is that you donnot read well or you donnot understand what you have read! Read this from the article "it will be implemented once an agreement on the security arrangement is reached."" Is that clear? Did it get through your thick brain.Now what has this to do with race? or your just speaking out of you inferiority complex? Arabs, non Arabs, black , dark is all nonsensens!

            repondre message

        • 5 August 2012 00:36, by Observer

          M Ali,
          I AM a Northerner but I am a realist, not one eyed as you are.
          There is an interesting study been done on comparing major stories published by Khartoum media as against outside media and the actual outcome of the story.
          The Khartoum media is being shown up for publishing one sided and incorrect stories.
          This is all to do with the NISS going in and stopping the truth being published

          repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 15:26, by mohammed ali

        Observer, you have previously said that you are from SS, no need to lie every time. I have never said am from SUDAN, neither jalabi, dark angle..or any other Sudanese. Today on this article you repeated that 2 times. You donnot need that; unless you want to cover up something! You are a lier!

        repondre message

        • 5 August 2012 00:39, by Observer

          M Ali,
          I have never said I am from S Sudan. I have only said I worked in Juba for a few months when we were united.
          I live and work in Khartoum, have a Sudanese passport so I am not the liar.
          You know it is better to keep your mouth shut and thought to be a fool rather then open it and tell the world you are.
          Just because I don’t support your employer doesn;t mean I am not Sudanese.
          I am a realist

          repondre message

          • 5 August 2012 09:09, by Ayman fadul

            LOL...BINGO
            hahahah his employer!!!
            who’s he observer??

            repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 12:22, by solider

    obsorver. forget about the pipelines.all the oil infrastructures in south sudan was built by north sudaness workers and money.it took the north more than 10 years of hard work to complet the project. the south didn’t pay single penny for us.don’t you think that is LOOTING?.they own us some billions.and we will take it by any means.

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 14:23, by solider

    AL HILO , MALIK AGAR. LOOK HOW SOUTH SUDAN BETRAYED AND SOLD YOU IN SECONDS. WITH THE $25 KHARTOUM REGIME WILL ERADICATE YOU BADLY. BY THE WAY THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THEY BETRAYED YOU.FIRST WHEN THEY SIGNED NIVASHA AND FORGOT ABOUT NUBA AND B.N. BELIVE ME U R NOTHING BUT SLAVES UNDER THEIR ASS.THEY GRAB U AND KICK YOU IN THE ASS ANYTIME THEY WANT.WHAT A HUMILIATION.

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 14:27, by solider

    yesterday south sudan was supporting all rebles in bn sk darfour. but today s.sudan is supporting the north to eradicate all those rebeles . agar, al hillo you are nothing but a joke.even the dog never get that humiliation

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 17:52, by BM-21

      TO.ALL Fake Arabs.
      let me assure you if it is all that imitate figures ,25.80 28.50 ,we are not going to sign any document with you,make sure and you will die like a wild dog,we know how to maintain the hungry ,since during 21 years ,we do not has any salaries ,until we defeated you to ur desert ,S Sudan oyeeeee, 15% per barrel oyee ,but not pick ,it will be change at any time 2to 3years 2% per b

      repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 14:32, by solider

    north sudan have the chance to take higlig compansation from that oil.6 billions

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 14:39, by Mapuor

      Soldier
      Panthou is 100% South Sudanese land,now why charge pipe lines and marine terminal separately,hoooooo,its becoz your economy was almost dying.Bin kalv.The agreement includes the pipeline, marine terminal, processing and transit fees.

      repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 17:43, by panom lualbil

    PAGAN AMUM ?

    Take that while working for alternative though. Or what you think?

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 18:39, by hellonearth

    NORTH SUDANESE PLEASE HOLD YOUR HORSES. THATS JUST ONE DEAL THAT YOU ARE PRIDING OF. WE STILL HAVE SECURITY AND BORDER DEMARCATION YET TO BE DONE. THE OIL WILL NOT FLOW UNTIL THESE ARE SORTED. DON’T JUST JUMP UP AND DOWN FOR NOTHING. 36$ OR LESS WHO CARE BUT WE STILL HAVE SOME UNSETTLED BUSINESS.

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 19:27, by Kim Deng

    Folks,

    What do expect if a country is leaded by corupt and coward man? Of course, humiliation and defeat all the time.

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 19:47, by katnyokarieu

      kim deng u fool, u don,t know that u re defecating in ur plate by abushing Dinka the mighty people.

      repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 19:51, by katnyokarieu

      kim deng u fool, u don,t know that u re defecating in ur plate by abushing Dinka the mighty people.

      repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 20:01, by Resonance

    News sources seem to indicate that the deals terms includ that South Sudan would pay $9.48 per barrel of oil for fees on one pipeline and $11 for another.

    The figures of $15-$26 apparently are based on the inclusion of a potential $3.028 billion payment will be made to South Sudan to Sudan if these deal is implemented.

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 20:02, by Resonance

    News sources seem to indicate that the deals terms includ that South Sudan would pay $9.48 per barrel of oil for fees on one pipeline and $11 for another.

    The figures of $15-$26 apparently are based on the inclusion of a potential $3.028 billion payment will be made to South Sudan to Sudan if this deal is implemented.

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 20:04, by Resonance

      Meant to say, "...by South Sudan to Sudan if this deal is implemented."

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 20:08, by Resonance

        More information about the potential payment (quotes from an AP article),

        "That amount is a one-off payment and compromises of a third of Sudan’s financial gap resulting from the loss of South Sudan’s oil revenue, it said."

        Also, "Sidiq said Sudan’s budget deficit reached $10.4 billion."

        repondre message

  • 5 August 2012 01:00, by Observer

    Mutrif Sidiq, the official spokesman for Sudan’s delegation in the talks in Addis Ababa told The Associated Press from Khartoum, that there was an agreement on the transit fees for two different pipelines, one transporting crude for export and another that is light crude oil that goes through a refinery before going to the port. One fee agreed to was $9.48, and another was for about $11.

    repondre message

    • 5 August 2012 04:29, by mohammed ali

      Mr.Observer, why are you so happy? Does it make you realistic when you go against the interest of your country! Funny! Whom are you trying to fool?! Transit fees is one part of the total fees , dear! What you mentioned is not the total fees because there is processing, port..etc fees.Intersting that you are celebrating that " your country" is getting less!

      repondre message

      • 5 August 2012 05:48, by Observer

        M Ali,

        All I am trying to do on here is provide some balance to the one eyed government propoganda you and other extremists from our country spout

        Like the ordinary Sudanese I am also suffering with the price increases etc we are facing here.
        I am a realist to accept that both Sudans need each other and the oil and it annoys me that had two stubborn Govts could have sorted this out earlier

        repondre message

        • 5 August 2012 08:57, by Ayman fadul

          observer..
          You are traitor for you own blood why u exposed these facts ..ooh no no .. y u didn’t let us fool those southerners a bit,why you don’t shut up and let us tease em up with these lies of exaggerated fees!!

          that’s how the great ’Elshaikh’ Mr.M Ali sees PATRIOTISM!!!

          when u tell the truth that’s means u r happy with it!!!!

          repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


The better approach to reconciliation 2013-05-17 06:07:06 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 16, 2013 - Some of you who might have read my previous articles know that I promised some weeks ago to write separately on the topic of peace and reconciliation that (...)

OIL: is it a curse or a blessing in South Sudan? 2013-05-17 06:04:54 By Jacob K. Lupai May 16, 2013 - In the late 70s when for the first time oil was discovered in Southern Sudan there was euphoria that poverty would be a thing of the past, replaced by a high (...)

The misapprehension of peace in the context of conflict resolution 2013-05-16 11:40:39 By Ngor Arol Garang May 16, 2013 - Political leaders and citizens with an interest in politics within the Bahr el Ghazal region will come together for a one week conference on Wednesday, where (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.