Home | Comment & Analysis    Friday 30 July 2004

Why Khartoum wants a war in Darfur

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

Ali Ali-Dinar, The Parliamentary Brief

July 2004 — Since the early 1970s, Darfur has been affected by waves of climatic changes which have forced some groups to migrate. Zaghawa moved from their homeland (Dar Zaghawa) to settle in the lands of the Fur, Arabs, Masalit, Birged, and as well as in many urban centres in Darfur and beyond.

This gradual movement took place without reported incidents and without assistance from the government. The same could be said of the movement of nomadic Arabs looking for pastures for their livestock.

Until recently, land ownership, and ethnic boundaries have been respected amicably by different ethnic groups in Darfur. Disputes were resolved in traditional conferences (ajaweed/muatamarat al sulh) whose rulings were always respected and honoured.

Even at times when the government was involved it served as a facilitator and not as an enforcer. Government neutrality contained ethnic conflicts not only in Darfur but also in Kordofan and in the south.

The 1980s brought a return to war in the south. Sudan’s then-government responded to military failure by arming Arab tribes bordering the south and with civil war in neighbouring Chad, small arms proliferated in Darfur. The National Islamic Front (NIF) government that came to power in the 1989 coup not only continued arming Arab tribes but imported an Arabist/Islamist philosophy that highlighted and widened ethnic divisions. Attacks on the African peoples of Darfur multiplied and government oppression increased.

Resistance was sporadic before the emergence of the Sudan Liberation Army (SLA) which opened its offensive by twice seizing a major town in Northern Darfur in February 2003. Unable to cope with the rebellion, the Government opened negotiations but quickly breached the cease-fire. In retaliation the SLA, now joined by the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) attacked El Fasher, Meleit, and Kutum.

The capture of large numbers of troops from El Fasher and north of Kutum forced the Government to sign a ceasefire and agree to negotiations in Abeche, Chad on 3 September 2003. The Government of Sudan and the SLA agreed to curbs on the Arab militias, the release of war prisoners, and the delivery of aid.

However, with continuous violations the cease-fire did not last long and the conflict quickly escalated to full-scale war against the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa. Cease-fires in 2004 have followed the same fate.

The Government’s new tactics included heavy aerial bombardment, the burning of villages, bombing of water sources, the killing of livestock, looting of homes, the destruction of farms, and ethnic cleansing.

Arbitrary arrests, the widespread use of torture, abductions and extra-judicial executions of those suspected of supporting the rebels, as well as the systematic raping of women and girls, are regularly reported.

There are several reasons for the National Islamic Front Government of Sudan’s war in Darfur. It is partly explained by the nature of the regime which, since it came to power, has used widespread repression, emergency laws, forcible conscription, arbitrary dismissal from work, as well as a jihad against the south and the Nuba mountains to tighten its grip on power.

If successful, the current peace talks in Naivasha will lose the NIF Government the use of war to rally the country behind it. Darfur could serve as a substitute for its war in the south.
The National Islamic Front Government of Sudan’s war in Darfur is influenced by the following:

1. The only internal threat to the NIF is the army and the war in Darfur keeps it pre-occupied;

2. The Darfur war provides a pretext for the extension of emergency laws and other repressive polices;

3. This war can serve as an excuse for delaying the elections required by the Machakos protocols;

4. War enriches NIF elites and the security forces and with the slow down of the war in the south and a possible peace a new source of profiteering is welcomed by many;

5. Revenge for what has been destroyed in arms and personnel in Darfur, and a victory - in contrast to army defeats in the south;

6. A large percentage of Government of Sudan soldiers are from western Sudan, so it’s in the Government’s interest to create division among them as one group;

7. Divide and rule: the Janjaweed spread fear and animosity between the Arab and African peoples of Darfur;

8. Weaken the Umma Party’s support among non-Arab Darfurians;

9. The presence of the NIF’s rival Islamist faction, the Popular National Congress (headed by NIF ideologue Hassan al Turabi), in the form of the JEM;

10. Generating support for the NIF from individuals and groups who have benefited from the war;

11. The war creates new alliances with groups that own livestock - a significant source of wealth - as future strategic partners;

12. Shifting the radius of the NIF’s ideological expansion westwards, after its defeat southwards.

The establishment of peace in Darfur is of vital importance, not only for its own inhabitants, but also nationally, regionally, and globally; the situation in Darfur is no different from that of southern Sudan.

The involvement of the government in the current war in Darfur, siding with some groups against others, has shattered the basis of peaceful co-existence among Darfurians, and even raises the question for many of their allegiance to the Sudanese state.

Peace in Darfur is necessary for stabilising the surrounding regions which include southern Sudan, Chad, and Central African Republic and to prevent the conflict spreading. The future of the region is at stake.

Dr. Ali B. Ali-Dinar, University of Pennsylvania, African Studies Center.



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


South Sudan and the inhumanity of the death penalty 2019-02-20 12:35:43 By Kur Ayuen Kou I am deeply appalled by the continuous use of the death penalty as the best form of punishment in our fractured society. In a span of one week, South Sudan has carried out six (...)

Evidence suggests inevitable victory of the 3rd Sudanese Revolution 2019-02-20 12:24:17 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman This is Third Sudanese Revolution, which broke out in December 2018, and has been going on for the Sixty Two days without a pause is worthy of Triumphant Victory. It is as (...)

Sudan’s December Revolution is not an Arab Spring 2019-02-16 08:14:10 By Mubarak Ardol Why the Sudanese have decided to put an end to the regime which has ruled them for three decades. Why is this happing now? It is known that Mr Bashir came to power in Sudan by (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


Ethnic Murle politicians say enough to cattle raiding 2018-12-28 09:32:00 December 27, 2018 (JUBA) - Murle political leaders in Buma state have vowed to end the practice of cattle raiding and child abduction by individuals in the community. Jodi Jonglei, who is also (...)

CEPO: South Sudan Opposition Alliance (SSOA): Stop politics of split and focus on R-ARCSS implementation 2018-12-26 09:53:29 26th December, 2018. South Sudan Opposition Alliance internal leadership change frication is disturbing and demoralizing public opinion. The big question CEPO is raising, will SSOA be a strong (...)

Progress observed at end of second month of R-ARCSS implementation 2018-10-22 06:44:02 Press Release 21 October 2018 South Sudanese government released 24 detainees in the implementation of the revitalized peace agreement said the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.