Home | Comment & Analysis    Sunday 11 July 2004

Is it genocide or not?

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

Thousands are dying in Sudan. Is it genocide or not?

By Tom Masland and Holly Bailey, Newsweek

July 12 issue - The venue was the message. Still, in case the point somehow escaped anyone in the crowd at Washington’s Holocaust Memorial Museum, the rally’s organizers pounded the word relentlessly: "Genocide!" They were talking about the ongoing crisis in Sudan’s Darfur region, where government-backed Arab militias have savagely driven roughly 1 million black villagers from their homes and land. Relief officials say 300,000 or more of the victims could die in the next few months of hunger and disease. Protesters gathered again in Washington last week outside the Sudanese Embassy to demand U.N. military intervention aimed at "ending the genocide of Sudan’s African people." An army of activists has taken up the cry. "This is genocide unfolding," says Physicians for Human Rights investigator John Heffernan. U.S. Committee for Refugees spokesman Steven Forester concurs: "It’s incumbent on the president to strongly call this by its rightful name. Time has run out."

What’s in a name? Plenty, when the topic is genocide. Applying the term to Darfur would give the Bush administration little choice but to put the matter before the U.N. Security Council, and would probably mean sending in U.N. troops. The United States is among the 135 parties to a 1948 U.N. convention denouncing genocide as "an odious scourge" and requiring the participating nations to punish and prevent "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group." Bill Clinton’s advisers froze at the prospect during the 1994 bloodbath in Rwanda (much to their later regret). But in recent weeks the Bush administration has crept to the very edge of using the word to describe Darfur. Both Secretary of State Colin Powell and U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan flew in last week to give the Sudanese government one last chance to stop the killing. "What we are seeing is a disaster, a catastrophe," Powell told reporters in Khartoum. "We can find the right label for it later. We’ve got to deal with it now."

Can Khartoum really be trusted to reverse course? Desperate barely begins to describe Darfur’s plight. "People spoke about their water supply being poisoned, their crops being burned, their livestock stolen," says Heffernan, who recently visited refugee camps on Darfur’s border with Chad. "There needs to be some kind of action. By waiting any longer, we risk the lives of tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of people." The State Department still lists Sudan’s government as a terrorist sponsor, but in recent months the African country has begun emerging from decades of anti-Western isolation. Once a haven for Osama bin Laden, Sudan has become helpful in the war on terror since ejecting the Qaeda leader in the late 1990s; this May, Khartoum reached a peace agreement to end a 21-year war with rebels in the south of the country. A cooperative Sudan would be a foothold for peace in the Horn of Africa-and U.N. military intervention could stop that process cold.

The conflict in Darfur has been festering for decades. As drought and overgrazing have extended the Sahara, Arab herders from northern Sudan have sought new pastures in Darfur, although its land is anything but lush. Last year hard-pressed villagers launched a revolt, and Khartoum enlisted the help of lawless Arabs known as the janjaweed-"armed men on horseback"-to put it down. Marauding bands killed wantonly, pillaged the countryside and not only raped local women but branded them. "The Sudanese government created a monster," says Paula Claycomb, a UNICEF official in Khartoum, "and they’re having trouble putting it back in the cage."

The White House hasn’t given up hope. At the end of last week’s visit, Powell announced that Khartoum had agreed to an expansion of the African Union’s 120-member military monitoring team in Darfur. Annan told a group of refugee women that he was trying to win guarantees of their safety so they could go home and plant new crops before too late in the current rainy season. Sudan’s president, Omar al-Bashir, promised to cut all red tape on relief deliveries for the next three months. And the foreign minister, Mustafa Ismail, voiced confidence that the janjaweed will be reined in. Relief officials aren’t sure. "Each visit brings promises of protection and assistance," a statement from Medecins sans Frontieres complained. "But people are still waiting." There ought to be a word for dying like that.



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


What federal system is suitable for South Sudan? 2019-11-12 11:06:55 By Dr Jacob K. Lupai* Introduction Federalism is seen as a constitutional arrangement for dividing power between different levels of government so that federated states, regions or provinces can (...)

Differences between Sudan government, SRF and FFC are the main issues of concern 2019-11-09 11:17:17 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman As the proverb goes, the difference of opinion does not spoil amity and does not spoil the friendliness issue. On the other hand, mere differences of point of view and (...)

Can women make the world more peaceful? 2019-11-06 11:31:03 By Paulino Akoon Yel Dut A genuine comprehensive analysis shows that involving women in peacebuilding increases the probability that violence will end in an easy manner. Hence we should thank (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.