Home | Comment & Analysis    Thursday 8 July 2004

Too tragic to ignore

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

Editorial, The USA Today

July 08, 2004 — In the USA, it would be unimaginable: Bands of men descend with the speed of Harley bikers, except on horseback. They destroy homes, execute men, rape women and force survivors into squalid camps in desert areas as harsh as arid Arizona. In the faraway capital, meanwhile, officials joke about it, insisting it’s malicious exaggeration.
Switch to Africa, and those scenes, which are actually happening right now in Sudan, have less power to shock. In the western Darfur region, 1.2 million people have been driven from their homes by terrifying marauders called the Janjaweed. Even visits there by Secretary of State Colin Powell and United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan last week haven’t raised the crisis to a level where the world pulls out all the stops.

That’s partly because Darfur reinforces fatigue-inducing stereotypes of Africa: corrupt leaders, Dark Ages-like poverty and disease, and so many hard-to-comprehend conflicts. The Iraq war further obscures the problem and limits U.S. options.

Yet a decade ago, when a mind-bogglingly brutal genocide in Rwanda, just south of Sudan, left 800,000 dead, the world vowed never to ignore such horrors again. Recently, former president Bill Clinton said his failure to act was one of his greatest regrets.

Feeble world efforts in Darfur sure have a familiar feel, though. The U.S. and U.N. may be threatening sanctions against the Janjaweed horsemen and pressing the government to secure the region for aid to get through. But the Sudanese leaders themselves have been arming the Arab militias committing the ethnic cleansing of blacks.

What’s needed is the international will right now to prevent, in the worst case, a million deaths. As it is, 300,000 are likely to lose their lives to the rampages, starvation and disease. Rains will soon make reaching the area more treacherous. The best solution is for well-armed U.N. forces to enforce security and a no-fly zone, with sanctions and a travel ban on Sudan’s leaders if they balk.

The U.S. has only suggested that it may back such drastic moves. It fears jeopardizing a remarkable agreement it recently helped craft to end a wider, near-half-century civil war in the country. But the situation is too urgent not to act.

Historically, the U.S. has paid only sporadic attention to Africa. A report to Congress today underscores reasons that’s not good enough. Among them: Poor countries in upheaval can become terrorist centers, as Sudan was for al-Qaeda. And Africa could one day provide up to 20% of U.S. oil imports.

But even without those extra reasons, standing by in the face of mass killings - the Holocaust, say, or Rwanda - is unconscionable. In the USA, Africa or anywhere else.



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


What federal system is suitable for South Sudan? 2019-11-12 11:06:55 By Dr Jacob K. Lupai* Introduction Federalism is seen as a constitutional arrangement for dividing power between different levels of government so that federated states, regions or provinces can (...)

Differences between Sudan government, SRF and FFC are the main issues of concern 2019-11-09 11:17:17 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman As the proverb goes, the difference of opinion does not spoil amity and does not spoil the friendliness issue. On the other hand, mere differences of point of view and (...)

Can women make the world more peaceful? 2019-11-06 11:31:03 By Paulino Akoon Yel Dut A genuine comprehensive analysis shows that involving women in peacebuilding increases the probability that violence will end in an easy manner. Hence we should thank (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.