Home | News    Sunday 5 September 2010

INTERVIEW: Sudan expert warns government against rejecting Darfur hybrid tribunals

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By Muhammad Osman

September 4, 2010 (KHARTOUM) – A prominent Sudan expert has warned the government against the consequences of failing to accept the proposal of the African Union (AU) to establish hybrid courts to adjudicate cases of crimes committed in Darfur region.

JPEG - 12.4 kb
Alex De Waal – Program Director of the Social Science Research Council (SSRC)

In exclusive statements to Sudan Tribune from Khartoum yesterday, Alex De Waal said that such a failure would be “foolish” and would make the Sudanese government lose support in Africa.

De Waal has also argued that the cause of justice in Darfur is “not well-served” by the International Criminal Court (ICC) and chided the ICC’s chief prosecutor, Luis-Moreno Ocampo, for seeking the arrest of Sudan’s president Omer Al-Bashir.

Alex De Waal is a British researcher and program director of the New York-based Social Science Research Council. He has authored several publications on Sudan and particularly on Darfur, including “Famine that Kills: Darfur, Sudan”, “War in Sudan: An Analysis of Conflict” and “Darfur: a short history of a long war” with Julie Flint.

He is currently serving as an adviser to the AU High-Level Panel on Darfur (AUPD), which was mandated in July 2008 by the AU’s Peace and Security Council to examine the situation in Darfur and submit recommendations on how to resolve Darfur crisis through reconciling elements of peace, justice and reconciliation. The eight-member AUPD is chaired by former South African President Thabo Mbeki.

More than a year later on October 8, 2009, the panel submitted its final report to the AU and concluded the Sudanese criminal justice response to Darfur was “ineffective and confusing” and that it “failed to obtain the confidence of the people of Darfur.”

Therefore, the panel recommended hybrid courts “constituted by judges of Sudanese and other nationalities” be established to “exercise original and appellate jurisdiction over individuals who appear to bear particular responsibility for the gravest crimes committed during the conflict in Darfur”

However, the Sudanese government at its top level has rejected the proposal. Sudan’s 2nd Vice-President Ali Osman Taha told the AU Peace and Security Council summit in Abuja in November 2009 that the Sudanese law and the competence of its judiciary “provide the necessary framework to achieve justice.”

Later in December, president Omer Hassan Al-Bashir, who faces two warrants of arrest by the ICC for his alleged role in the Darfur conflict, said in an interview with ‘Russia Today’ TV that his country rejects the idea of foreign judges sitting on the bench for Darfur trials.

“We, at our end expressed reservation on this point [hybrid court] because we have an independent judiciary and the judicial institution has the [final] say in forming any courts inside the borders to prosecute any Sudanese [citizen]. Mbeki understands our reservations” Al-Bashir said.

But according to De Waal, members of the AUPD and its chairman “repeatedly bring up this issue with the government.” De Waal said that the AU “has given the Sudan government an opportunity for an overall political package that includes justice.”

“If the Sudan government fails to take that opportunity”, De Waal warned, “it will be foolish and it will lose a lot of the support and sympathy it may have in Africa.”

De Waal was keen to point out that the mandate of the panel is due to be up in October next month and that the panel will then have to report back to the AU.

“You must watch and see what is in that report” he told me, in an indication that the panel’s report could point to the government’s failure to comply with the panel’s recommendations.

The Mebki panel so far has appeared to have shifted focus from Darfur to the upcoming referendum in South Sudan which is part of his mandate in accordance with the AU resolution.

He has been met with a major setback during an attempt to arrange a meeting between opposition parties and the ruling National Congress Party (NCP) ahead of the elections that took place last April.

Opposition leaders later slammedMbeki saying he succumbed to pressure from the NCP and suggesting that it is in line with the AU’s supportive position of Khartoum.

De Waal has earned a reputation of being strongly opposed to the ICC’s warrant of arrest for President Al-Bashir and broadly critical of the ICC’s prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo.

The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Bashir for war crimes and genocide in Sudan’s western Darfur region during a counter-insurgency campaign.

He has consistently argued that the arrest warrant against Al-Bashir is detrimental to the cause of peace and justice in Darfur and tantamount to demanding a “regime change” in Khartoum.

On this issue, De Waal has opined the government’s failure to remedy the justice problem in Darfur is what has led to the ICC’s involvement in the case but he also raised doubts about the court’s effectiveness and the competence of its prosecutor.

“Horrendous crimes were committed in Darfur, especially during 2003-2004. The great majority of those crimes were committed by government forces or people acting on behalf of the government” he said, adding that the government “has taken no serious actions over all these years for justice and accountability, really nothing.”

“And because of that failure” he said later “that the ICC has come in to Sudan” He concluded that the government “has only itself to blame.”

However, De Waal says that the cause of justice for Darfur people “is not well served by the ICC for two reasons.”

“The first” he says “is that the ICC will only prosecute a very small number of people. It will not bring to justice more than five, six or ten people. Even if it was a well-functioning, very professional court, the majority that it would ever bring to trial would be ten or 12 people.”

Louis Moreno Ocampo is the second reason. “If the people of Darfur or Sudan think that Louis Moreno Ocampo is the man who will bring justice to Darfur, I think they are going to be disappointed because I don’t think he is very professional” he said.

“I think he [Ocampo] has made a lot of mistakes and we see the case that he has in court is failing and the way that he constructed his case against president Bashir was very poor” he added later.

In January 2009, De Waal published a critique of the ICC prosecutor’s case against Al-Bashir, excoriating the prosecutor’s application for Al-Bashir’s arrest warrant as “riddled with flaws.”

In his critique, De Waal argued that the mode of liability pursued by the prosecutor, which in Al-Bashir’s case is the indirect preparation of crimes on account of “Al-Bashir’s total control over the every relevant institution of the state”, is “neither demonstrated in the evidence presented nor supported by past patterns of action.”

De Waal said that “those who want justice for Darfur should be criticizing Moreno Ocampo. They should be saying this man is not up to the job that we want a more professional ICC.”

According to De Waal, Ocampo’s “political” choice of going after Al-Bashir is “very poor” because its result was to allow the President to “rally people on nationalism, etc.”

The Darfur conflict broke out in 2003 when rebels, belonging mostly to African ethnic groups in Darfur, staged an armed struggle against the central government of Khartoum, accusing it of neglecting the region in terms of development, wealth-sharing and representation.

According to UN estimates, the conflict has killed 300,000 people and displaced million people. The Sudanese government says the conflict has been exaggerated by Western media, putting the death toll at only 10,000.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 5 September 2010 05:37, by johnmaker

    I totally greed with Mr. Alex De Waal for the critque on Mr. Luis the so called ICC judge.The man is doing nothing at all rather than sitting there and sing a slogan of defeat.If he was serious judge he would have do something long time ago.Bashir now travel all over and nothing has been don.The killing still continue in Darfur.I urged international community to take this case of Durfur to ICCJ ( international criminal court of Justice) in which America is a member may be the can do something faster than this there for nothing ICC.

    repondre message

  • 5 September 2010 10:15, by telfajbago

    The engineer of Darfur Peace Agreement(DPA) of Minni Minnawi Alex de Waal should issue public apologia to the people of Darfur for complicating their cause after he misled the AU and the International Community to push for signing the doomed Abuja peace agreement; which caused the death of hundreds of thousands live of innocent civilians.Today the displaced people of Al-Salam IDP camp of Al-Fashir, the displaced people of Mahajiriyya and Tapid and those displaced by Minni are crying for holding Mr.de Waal accountable for his misadvise. It’s funny that Mr. Alew still poking his nose on the cause of Darfur, dispute his in repairable damage he did to the people on the ground. If Alex is serious about the Justice why is he criticizing the ICC on the first place? Marketing the unmarketable good of the political prostitute Thabo Mbeki that Darfurian victims rejected instead. Did Alew wants to tell us that the AU. Panel is more trusted by the victims than the ICC?Mr. Alex we know the dairy game you and your girlfriend Julie Flint are playing and how much you have being paid by Khartoum to do you theatrics, but now we don’t have time for you. Please be reminded and assured tha your time will come.

    repondre message

  • 5 September 2010 11:18, by Hesham Al-Nur

    Oh So you are working for the AU now? That where you get your hefty paycheck and per Diem funded by the EU taxpayers’ money. No wonder you are so dedicated to attack the ICC prosecutor, pretty much in line with the positions of Jean Ping and other African leaders. That explains it all.

    So in the extreme case if Mbeki reports to the AU that Khartoum is not cooperating with regards to the hybrid court, what will they do? Impose sanctions? Issue a condemnation?

    Get real Alex, the purpose of the panel has been defeated and I doubt Mbeki really pressed Khartoum on hybrid courts. This is all lips service and Mbeki is not someone to be trusted. We have all read what Ahmed Maher said and Mbeki did not issue a denial.

    Its really time for Mbeki panel to dismantle itself and go home and stop wasting money. Personally Alex your role in the DPA should have taught you a lesson but looks like you don’t learn since your only following the money trail.

    repondre message

    • 5 September 2010 13:10, by Kon Paul Awenchol

      Dear readers.
      Mr: Alex De Waal i congratulate you very much for your relaunching against the fail Government of Sudan,so an effective leader is an effective politician, i agree with you about the aforementioned topic which is alerting the World for what is happening in Sudan,since 1956 the Government and her army has become expert in killing her own civilian then to even fight any other neighboring state.which is a big challenge that has brought backwardness of Sudan from the leading states in Africa.the fool that has comment above has nothing to share views in this political website,why always Sudan government put salt in the sugar,process of peace deal is going on in Doha and the government militias are still killing innocent civilian in Darfur,why doing that,the Darfur/Khartoum peace agreement will doomed to failure becoz the government of Khartoum has always like backwardness,i-e from "Dawn to dusk"a government that has fail in Nation building and won how to persecute her own people,which is which? Omar [a donkey that has expert in transporting and crossing hot Desert from one place to another and eating somebody plants without permission].Bashir a leader who is in search of consensus, and who is not abide by the role of laws,now things has come to an end where Bashir will definitely see the ICC without fudging and hedging the world justice. so keep on alerting the World for the failure of base government of Khartoum not Government of Sudan,if it is the Government of Sudan they leaders couldn’t army militias to killed innocent civilian in Darfur and others part of Sudan where Bashir can rally upon them.

      BY THE TRUE CITIZEN.

      repondre message

  • 19 March 2013 19:39, by dennishobson

    8wKWu3zuD0WZG1iLIXxKmKIZA1NNB0ssangyong madeira plastica plastic lumber Can I just say what a relief to find someone who actually knows what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know how to bring an issue to light and make it imp

    repondre message

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


What federal system is suitable for South Sudan? 2019-11-12 11:06:55 By Dr Jacob K. Lupai* Introduction Federalism is seen as a constitutional arrangement for dividing power between different levels of government so that federated states, regions or provinces can (...)

Differences between Sudan government, SRF and FFC are the main issues of concern 2019-11-09 11:17:17 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman As the proverb goes, the difference of opinion does not spoil amity and does not spoil the friendliness issue. On the other hand, mere differences of point of view and (...)

Can women make the world more peaceful? 2019-11-06 11:31:03 By Paulino Akoon Yel Dut A genuine comprehensive analysis shows that involving women in peacebuilding increases the probability that violence will end in an easy manner. Hence we should thank (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.