Home | Comment & Analysis    Sunday 30 May 2004

The world can’t continue to ignore Sudan

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

We have a responsibility to protect Sudanese civilians from the campaign of ethnic hatred and violence coordinated by their government

Editorial, the Chicago Tribune

By Jonathan F. Fanton

CHICAGO, May 30, 2004 — The world recently marked the 10th anniversary of the Rwandan genocide with wide expressions of collective remorse for the international community’s failure to stop state-sanctioned butchery in Central Africa.

Today, I am troubled by the idea that the international community is better at commemorating genocides than stopping crimes against humanity. Even as we remember Rwanda, the world’s reticence to take decisive steps in Sudan risks another moral catastrophe, and thousands of avoidable deaths in another remote African nation.

I visited Rwanda in 2002, where I spent time at a genocide memorial located in the small town of Gikongoro. In July 1994, as many as 50,000 Tutsis sought refuge at a boarding school there; almost all of them met a violent death during a two-night rampage.

I saw rooms that now house 27,000 skeletons exhumed from a mass grave, skeletons that reveal where a machete had cut a throat or sliced a skull, skeletons with clenched teeth showing the anguish of a painful death. In one room, a tarpaulin bearing the United Nations insignia covered an open window, shielding their bones from rain. One could not escape the irony of the UN providing protection in death, but not in life.

It is against that sad history that we confront Sudan’s fate.

The facts are stark. As documented in a new report from Human Rights Watch, government troops and government-backed Arab militias, the Janjaweed, are engaged in a systematic campaign of ethnic cleansing in Darfur, a large region of western Sudan. Government forces and Janjaweed militias are killing, raping and destroying the homes of black African civilians from the Fur, Massalit, and Zaghawa ethnic groups. They are attacking villages with helicopters and planes, bombing residents, hunting down the survivors, and then burning whatever or whomever happens to remain. Some 30,000 have been killed already and more than a million have been displaced from their homes. Hundreds of thousands more risk death from disease and starvation as the Sudanese government blocks their access to humanitarian aid.

These crimes must be stopped. The world has a responsibility to protect Sudanese civilians from the campaign of ethnic hatred and violence coordinated by their government. And we have a duty to prevent the humanitarian catastrophe that looms on the horizon.

The unfolding tragedy need not end this way. Having studied the lessons of our collective failure in Rwanda, the world is much better equipped to take concrete, preventive measures to avert humanitarian disasters in places like Sudan. But in order to avoid greater devastation, the international community—especially the UN’s Security Council—must act quickly to apply the principles articulated in an important UN document, "The Responsibility to Protect."

Following the Rwandan genocide and at the encouragement of UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, Canada, with support from a group of major foundations, including the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, established the International Commission on State Sovereignty and Humanitarian Intervention. The commission asked the simple but profound question: When a state fails to protect its own people—or worse, assaults them—what is the international community’s obligation to act, even intervene; what steps, including intervention, are justified; and how should these actions be conducted and coordinated?

"The Responsibility to Protect," lays the intellectual foundation for changing assumptions about the world’s obligations. It articulates a primary duty for the international community: to prevent such crises, using evidence of egregious human rights abuses as an early warning. A patient set of non-military steps is identified—fact-finding missions, international appeals, political and economic sanctions, arms embargoes, seizure of assets—giving the world community options it must exhaust before reacting with appropriate military means. Many of these options still exist in Sudan, but the window of opportunity is quickly closing.

Sudan represents a test of how committed the world really is to these evolving norms and of how deeply they are taking hold, because the case for applying them is clear. Despite recent expressions of outrage over Sudan’s preposterous election to the UN Human Rights Commission, the international community is once again woefully derelict in its duty to act.

The principles of the "responsibility to protect" are reflected in the recommendations from Human Rights Watch: the Security Council should adopt immediately a resolution demanding an enforceable cease-fire in Darfur and providing for the unrestricted delivery of humanitarian assistance to those who have been displaced, creating an environment for their safe return. An international human rights monitoring mission must then report publicly on abuses and violations of humanitarian law in Darfur. And UN member states, international humanitarian agencies and non-governmental organizations should contribute personnel, equipment and funding to these efforts.

Great damage has already been done in Darfur, but an even greater calamity can be avoided. For those already affected, the tragedy cannot be undone. But the international community must still fulfill its responsibility to protect those who remain defenseless in the face of aggression. The world must act in western Sudan before it is again too late.

Jonathan F. Fanton is president of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


The Perils of Managing Transition: Will Sudanese Kandakas be the option? 2019-05-21 04:45:56 By Luka Kuol, PhD Global Fellow at Peace Research Institute Oslo, Associate Professor at University of Juba and Fellow at Rift Valley Institute Since the eruption of the Sudanese popular (...)

Justices delay is justices denied 2019-05-21 04:40:18 By Wesley Kosa The Khartoum Peace Agreement was the result of the political manipulation by the governments of South Sudan, Uganda and Sudan. There were no extensive discussions and mediation (...)

The fear of political reforms in South Sudan 2019-05-19 02:16:35 By Duop Chak Wuol In his Easter message, President Salva Kiir called on the leader of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-In Opposition (SPLM-IO), Dr Riek Machar, to go to Juba to form a (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)

Joseph Malwal Dong joined the SPLM/A -IO 2019-04-02 08:35:02 SPLM/A (IO) Press Release 1/4/2019 On Hon. Joseph Malwal Dong Joined the SPLM/A (IO) The leadership of the SPLM/A (IO) would like to seize this precious opportunity to announce to members and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.