Home | Comment & Analysis    Wednesday 23 April 2008

Scramble to Dam the Congo Keeps Africans in the Dark

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By Terri Hathaway

April 22, 2008 — A lucrative hydropower scheme proposed for the Congo River has become Africa’s next great scramble. Led by the World Energy Council, major industries, banks, and governments met in London this week to seek their piece of the US$80 billion Grand Inga project - the world’s largest hydropower installation. The scheme is being promoted as a development venture to electrify the African continent, where two in every three people now lack access to electricity. Nearly a hundred officials and big money interests discussed how to profit from one of Congo’s great natural resources, but Congolese officials disappeared shortly after the meeting commenced with no explanation to organizers. Worse, organizers had refused to invite Congolese civil society and area communities, leaving no voice to defend the country’s interest.

The Council refused to invite Africans monitoring the Inga project, subjecting them - unlike any other participants - to government authorization. Yet the Council invited these same individuals - a small delegation from affected communities and public interest groups - to the last Inga forum. The local peoples’ presence at that meeting provided an essential reality check after one official stated that Grand Inga required no resettlement. In fact, at least 8,000 villagers, possibly more, face displacement. Yet the Council and other project backers are now steadfastly refusing to include African civil society in discussions. If Inga is meant to light up Africa, then why are its backers keeping Africans in the dark over project planning?

For starters, Africa’s unelectrified communities aren’t really Inga’s intended client base. The project’s huge price tag covers only the cost of the hydropower plant and long-distance transmission lines to Africa’s mining and industrial heartlands, and urban centers in South Africa, Egypt and other distant countries. Local distribution lines will not be included, meaning the project’s electricity won’t reach even a fraction of the continent’s half billion people not yet connected to the grid. Building a distribution network that would actually "light up Africa" would increase the project’s cost exponentially. Instead of direct access to Inga’s energy, the project’s social development plan is based on trickle-down economics, a model notorious for its elusive benefits and poor record in Africa’s fight against poverty.

Exploiting Inga could also further fuel Africa’s "resource curse". The project’s enormous budget and bountiful contracts could devolve Inga into a corruption-riddled white elephant. Trying to stop such a fate would require unwavering scrutiny in the tamest of political environments, and is impossible, some argue, in today’s Congo. By design, Inga would centralize a vast store of the region’s electric and financial power, a development model that can foster tensions and civil wars. More decentralized energy development would spread wealth and electricity more evenly within the country, helping Congo move away from its conflictive past.

No stranger to the hydro curse that has afflicted so many African nations, Congo (then Zaire) built two dams at Inga in the 1970s and ’80s, which degraded local living standards despite promises to the contrary. The dams also produced a crushing debt burden for the country rather than a sustainable industrial base. Inga I and Inga II exemplify the history of large dams, which have left a trail of sorrows for affected people and disproportionately small gains for Africa’s poor. One of the many critical lessons learned from past dams is the need for open and inclusive planning from the beginning. While participation alone can’t guarantee success, it is key for improving development outcomes.

Today, thousands of villagers living near the Inga rapids anxiously await information about the project’s potential impacts on their lives, wondering if their rights and needs will again be ignored. Fifty million Congolese, and hundreds of millions more Africans, wonder how long until their communities will be electrified, and if Grand Inga could speed up or slow down that wait. Citizens from Congo to South Africa are wondering who may profit from this $80bn investment and if it is at the expense, rather than the benefit, of Africans. These are Inga’s most vulnerable stakeholders who are barred from participating in the Council’s April forum.

The World Energy Council’s claims that the Inga project will benefit Africa’s poor are undermined by its actions to exclude them from planning. If the Council and other project proponents truly want to develop energy that responds to the needs of Africa’s people, while protecting those at risk, they must bring African civil society players to the table. Without such openness, Grand Inga could be a grand failure at bringing Africa’s neglected majority into the light.

The author is an International Rivers, Africa Campaigner



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


In memoirs of Dr John Garang de Mabior 2015-07-30 06:14:54 By Mabor Maker Dhelbeny The event of commemorating this day, as a memorial day of our martyrs since 1955 to 2005 was because of the Late Dr John Garang de Mabior. He died in a helicopter plane (...)

Sudan and the US Department of Justice: Moral myopia on a grand scale 2015-07-29 05:50:40 By Eric Reeves The Obama administration Department of Justice (DOJ) continues in its refusal to answer critical questions about the $9 billion settlement with French banking giant BNP Paribas (...)

No viable compromise in the IGAD Plus proposed ‘Compromised Peace Agreement’ 2015-07-28 20:37:09 By Taban Abel Aguek The efforts for peace in South Sudan and the international community shall always never skip a mention. Even as people criticize IGAD, TROIKA or the negotiating teams, it’s (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


Sudanese, human rights groups and advocates demand renewal of UNAMID 2015-06-25 06:03:32 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: New York: Ahmed H.Adam, Tel. +1 347 567 1491 or aha64@cornell.edu Kampala: Abdelrahman Gasim, Tel. +256 7 51 90 77 77 or gasim202000@gmail.com Geneva: Abdelbagi (...)

Civil society groups urge to stop hostilities in W. Bahr El Ghazal 2015-06-11 22:24:37 Urgent action for sustainable peace in Western Bahr El Ghazal State Civil Society Statement: June 10, 2015 Wau –Western Bahr El Ghazal State- The Republic of South Sudan We, civil society (...)

Two South Sudanese pastors face death penalty in Khartoum 2015-06-03 06:08:37 African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies Two South Sudanese Pastors face death penalty for voicing opposition to corruption scandal at Khartoum Bahri Church (2 June 2015) Two South Sudanese (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2015 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.