Home | Comment & Analysis    Wednesday 16 January 2008

Confederal System for Sudan


By Mahmoud A. Suleiman

January 15, 2008 — In the wake of the renewed debate over the establishment of confederal system in the whole country proposed by the deputy chairman of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM/A), Mr. Malik Agar Eyre, and the readiness of the ruling National Congress Party (NCP) to discuss such idea. Darfur rebel movements are interested to join. The Movements are willing to fully exchange opinions with all political parties, civic society and people of all circles in the country under the common goal of peaceful coexistence in a multicultural multiethnic of equal rights and duties, men and women, based on shared values in building civility and citizenship. Sudan has tried a plethora of political systems for Sudan since its independence including Democratic Parliamentary Central unitary system, Totalitarian Military regimes, quasi-Federal regional and along with the current Two -Tier two-partner `one country, two systems,’ north - south divide. All these systems have turned out to be an abject failure. They failed to deliver the needs of the people of Sudan. Many analysts thought it well worth to give confederal system a chance. It might bring about some solace for those who entertain the view of opting for the principle of Self determination which is often seen as a moral and legal right, that "all peoples have the right [to] freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development." It is embodied in several treaties and is held to form part of customary international law.

The unitary system is characterised by the fact that sovereignty resides exclusively with the central government and that local governments, when they exist, are entirely subordinated to the central authority. . In a confederation, because the member-states have retained the entirety of their sovereignty, they may pull out of the union at any time. The federal system borrows some features from the other two systems: from the unitary system it adopts the idea that the central government must have some sovereign powers while it retains from the confederal system the principle that the local governments have preserved for themselves some sovereign powers. In other words, Federalism is a system of government where two levels of government exist, each sovereign in its sphere of jurisdiction. In a genuine Federal system there is the division and sharing of power between the national government and the states. A confederal system is defined by (Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) as a group of empowered states or communities, usually created by treaty but often later adopting a common constitution. Confederations tend to be established for dealing with critical issues, such as defense, foreign affairs, foreign trade, and a common currency, with the central government being required to provide support for all members. A confederation, in modern political terms, is usually limited to a permanent union of sovereign states for common action in relation to other states.

In the Sudan’s political experience, the Unitary System inherited from the colonial Great Britain had concentrated all political and economic power in the hands of the Riverain elites in Khartoum, eventually ripping off the peripheries of any power. Over the decades that system worked well in the favour of Northern Region and the Central Region near Khartoum at the expense of Southern region, Eastern Region, Angasana, Kordofan and Darfur Region. Development has been focused only in the infamous ex-minister of finance Abdel Rahim Hamdi’s economic triangle of Dungola-Sennar-Kordofan Axis. Professor Atta el-Battahani, of the University of Khartoum, writes (2006) his article: Sudan: A complex web: politics and conflict in Sudan: “Successive regimes have manipulated administrative structures to undermine the control of local people and authorities over resources. Identity and ideology, particularly Arab nationalism and political Islamism, have been used to mobilize support to compensate for the governance and development failings of state policies. The war between the government of Sudan (GOS) and southern armed groups (1955-1972 and 1983-2005) has received the most international attention, but a sense of marginalization has not just been a southern phenomenon. Elements of the Beja in the east, the Fur in Darfur, and the Nuba in Kordofan among many others have been drawn into armed conflict with the Sudanese government or government-backed militias. Elites have mastered the divide-and-rule tactics inherited from the colonial era through their territorial organization of the modern Sudanese state. The result has been underdevelopment, exclusion and violent conflict. ”

Observers feel that Confederal System may be the only pre-emptive intervention tool that can be utilised to rescue the country from falling apart. This is more so, given the fact that we are only about a couple of years away from the referendum on the independence of the Southern Sudan which is scheduled for January 2011. The CPA offers no right of continuation of the Khartoum concession agreements if the South votes in the 2011 referendum to secede. Furthermore, Abyei, Nuba Mountains, and Blue Nile are to hold a referendum in 2011 on whether to join South Sudan. The crisis in Darfur which has been described by the UN as “the worst humanitarian and human rights catastrophe in the world, remains a time bomb that threaten stability of the whole country unless a sustainable resolution to the conflict is achieved. The ruling National Congress Party (NCP), formerly the National Islamic Front (NIF), which came to power in a 1989 military coup, that dominates a merely notional Government of National Unity in Khartoum has never abided by any agreement with any Sudanese political party or a Darfur rebel group, continues to pose a serious threat to the unity of Sudan. Mustafa Osman Ismail, of the National Congress Party is reported to have said that his party is ready to discuss such idea if the SPLM, co-signatory of the 2005 peace deal demanded formally to discuss the confederation with them. This rhetoric is part of the NCP prevarication and propaganda in the state media. Will the National Congress Party (NCP) government of Sudan honour the promises of discussing the confederation? That is a "sixty-four-dollar question"!

Dr. Mahmoud A. Suleiman is the Deputy Chairman of the General Congress for Justice and Equality Movement (JEM). He can be reached at mahmoud.abaker@gmail.com

The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 16 January 2008 18:51, by Gatwech

    Hello Dr. Mahmoud,

    No, no, no! Let us not confuse ourselves again with the so-called confederal system. I thought you have already convinced yourself that Sudan has tried almost every government system on this planet earth to keep it united, but ended up in failures. Why then would we want to try a system that will also end up in failure? Let us stick to the full implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) which provides for the right of self-determination for the people of Southern Sudan, etc. The statements by the SPLM 3rd Deputy Chairman, Mr. Malik Agar, which are in favour of the confederal system, are his own opinion. The people of Southern Sudan shall not trade their right of self-determination for a cheap solution like confederal system, unless they vote for unity in 2011 referendum. And by the way, Dr., the people of Darfur have the right to self-determination in their region. Why don’t they try it?


    repondre message

    • 17 January 2008 07:09, by Urbano Tito Tipo

      Dear Gatwech, with due respect to your view in which I fully agree, actually Mr. Malik was representing the opinion of current SPLM leadership. Mr. Malik is the deputy chairman of SPLM. Mr. Abdel Aziz Hileu has been appointed as deputy secretary-general and shadow secretary-general in the next SPLM convention. These gentlemen are expressing what they know will happen. CPA is on the road to be change. The people of the three regions namely Abyei, Nuba Mountains and Blue Nile knows very well that if the south becomes independant then their case is gone leave alone Darfur who are not even sure how their case will end-up. Brother Gatwech, things are changing very fast within SPLM structures. Appointments are single hand made without consultation with the rest in the leadership. We have been made to wrangle with each other and the camel is moving.

      repondre message

      • 17 January 2008 15:21, by Trueson of Southerner

        Dear Gatwec,your comment is absolutly true,but the comment of Mohammed Urbano was not making sence,since he is after the removal of his Uncle Dr Lam Akol not knowing that he was succeeded by another Shilluk.
        Mr Urbano if you have problem with Pagan Amum go and discussed as family,but don’t critised the SPLM goverment alway.
        you have to changed these habit.
        let me coming back to the point,we don’t want the confedral system.
        enough is enough long time ago.

        repondre message

        • 18 January 2008 05:57, by Deng Thiak Adut


          I am glade you said what was in my heart: I finally understand that Dr Mohamoud still sleeping and possibly working for Unity. When unity came, trust me, there will be deadly terrorism in the south, they wishes it was going to be worse than living in hell. I don’t see myself uniting with myself now. so what make you think unity is attractive to me?

          repondre message

        • 21 January 2008 11:03, by Urbano Tito Tipo

          Mr. so-called trueson southerner may not have understood the top written by Gatwech because of his low calibre and low education level. This article by Gatwech has nothing to do with Dr. Lam or Pagan Amum. Let me tell you I have due respect for Pagan Amum. You must be an absess dinka with narrow mind. Please try to understand political trand these days. Try to see the danger of Malik Agar, Yasir Araman, Abdel Aziz Hiliu and pro-uninionist taking over the leadership of SPLM. They are trying to derail CPA. Will the case which you are dreaming of in your diaspora come true. If you are angry because of Ahmed Deng Alor. Go to his school records in Muglad and Medani and see his name on records. If you think Abyei is part of South Sudan then produce records why Abyie is part of the south. Why did Ahmed go to school in Muglad and not Gogrial or Kwajok in Bahr El Ghazal? My friend trueson of soutth, do not show your dirty underwear. No one needs to see it. If you go on this debate as you write you will loose.

          repondre message

  • 18 January 2008 09:02, by Toposa Boy southerner

    No .no . no . to Malik Agar that is NCP PLAN B wake up southerners that is MUNDUKURU jalaba idea No way to that useless men Malik fuck you very much and i hope you will be remove very soon and go back to where you belong south as nothing to do your NCP Plan may be is good for your people in nuba mountain or in north

    repondre message

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

The political calculations of Sudan’s military regime 2019-04-22 20:37:26 How Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir was overthrown and what happens next in Sudan By Ahmed H Adam* On April 11, after 30 years in power, the longstanding dictator, General Omar al-Bashir, was (...)

Will the military or the people lead Sudan? 2019-04-22 16:25:04 Support by regional and international partners will be critical to address the economic crisis, as well as the reformation of government institutions, ministries and security agencies By Ahmed (...)

Will uprising in Sudan provide a new political dispensation? 2019-04-20 06:25:31 By Luka Kuol* The recent wave of uprising in some African countries shows the new means of contesting the African rulers who stayed in power for so long and are hardly to be unseated through the (...)


Latest Press Releases

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)

Joseph Malwal Dong joined the SPLM/A -IO 2019-04-02 08:35:02 SPLM/A (IO) Press Release 1/4/2019 On Hon. Joseph Malwal Dong Joined the SPLM/A (IO) The leadership of the SPLM/A (IO) would like to seize this precious opportunity to announce to members and (...)

Sudan Protests: Investigate the custodial death of three University students 2019-03-13 12:53:14 The African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies (ACJPS) Sudan Protests: Urgent call for investigations into the custodial death of three University students and alleged torture of detainees by (...)


Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.