Home | News    Saturday 16 June 2007

Eritrea rejects Ethiopia acceptance of UN border decision


June 15, 2007 (UNITED NATIONS) — Eritrea rejected Ethiopia’s "unconditional" acceptance of a U.N. boundary commission ruling that it return a disputed town to Eritrea, arguing Friday that its agreement contained stipulations that undermined the spirit of the ruling.

In a letter last week to the U.N. Security Council, the Ethiopian government agreed to the commission’s decision, announced five years ago, that it return the key town of Badme to Eritrea. The status of the town was part of a tense, nine-year-long, border dispute.

But in its own letter to the council on Friday, Eritrea blamed the Security Council for failing to force Ethiopia to turn over Badme and "encouraging Ethiopia to flout the rule of law."

Amanuel Giorgio, a diplomat at Eritrea’s U.N. Mission, said "so far as Eritrea is concerned, Ethiopia continues to present conditionalities to the decision of the boundary commission which is final and binding."

"It’s asking the Security Council to demand that Eritrea enter into dialogue," he said. "That means reopening the decision of the boundary commission. Our reading of the letter is that Ethiopia has not yet changed its position."

No one at the Ethiopian U.N. mission was immediately available for comment.

This is the latest round of mudslinging between the two dueling nations that both claim Badme and fought a bloody 2 1/2-year war after Ethiopian soldiers opened fire on Eritrean soldiers in the border town in 1998.

The Horn of Africa neighbors initially promised to accept the boundary commission’s 2002 ruling awarding the disputed town to Eritrea, but Ethiopia has not handed it over.

Eritrea gained independence from Ethiopia in 1993 following a 30-year guerrilla war. Ethiopian officials have long accused Eritrea of terrorist acts in Ethiopia and for lending support to insurgent groups in Somalia.

A 2000 truce agreeing to cease hostilities has made the border more peaceful, but tensions have occasionally flared to the point that international observers feared a new war could break out.

Last week, Ethiopia harshly criticized Eritrea’s military occupation of a 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) U.N. mandated buffer zone.

Eritrean forces have moved into the zone over the past year and stymied efforts by U.N. peacekeepers to monitor the area. The Security Council has repeatedly called for Eritrea to lift its restrictions, including its ban on U.N. helicopter flights and night patrols.

Eritrea also blames Ethiopia for blocking the peacekeeping mission on the border, accusing them of "harassing" U.N. personnel and engaging in a steady buildup of forces in the southern portion of the buffer zone.

There is not much the U.N. can do to force the two parties to cooperate, U.N. associate spokesman Yves Sorokobi said Thursday.

"The U.N. has not handed out any punishment to Eritrea even though it is aware for several months now," he added.

The commission renewed its call for a response from the two countries last month, giving a November deadline for the implementation of its decision on the new border.

Eritrea responded to the commission’s request in May, agreeing with the decision.

Since its publication last week, there had been virtually no reaction to the Ethiopian acceptance until Friday.

Sorokobi said there have been no relations between the two sides.

The Security Council will be in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on Friday and Saturday to meet with African Union and Ethiopian officials at the start of a five-country African mission. Sorokobi said the Ethiopia-Eritrea border issue will probably be discussed.

The U.N. peacekeeping force in the tense buffer zone has been reduced in the past year by 2,500 troops to 1,700. Authorization for the force expires next month, but Sorokobi said it will likely be extended.

If the new border decision is not implemented, Sorokobi warned that "positions will probably harden."

"There has been an increase of hostile rhetoric from both parties and it’s something that has preoccupied the situation," he said.


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 16 June 2007 12:13, by Kifly Merhu

    Hi everyone,
    What kind of gevernments and leaders? They hold the brotherly people as hostage with some terminolgies like accept in principle but dialog first, accept unconditionaly but dialog first,..etc. I think, they don’t want us to come forward and fight our core enemies like poverty and backwardness.
    This kind of theatre must have an end and stop to jeopardize the peace process. If our governments/leader were visionary enough, they could have understand that the demarcated border will have no sense for the coming generation.
    But I not sure, whether the core problem is the border.

    repondre message

    • 18 June 2007 01:25, by Hana

      ofcouse the border needs to be demarcated inorder for the two countries to make peace. eventhough some tribes in Eritrea and ethiopia are simliar and use similar language, eritrea and ethiopia are two different countries.Thus the border must be demarcated for future generation so that they don’t run into the same problems that we are having now. even Canada and USA whom are exactly alike (use same language, same white ppl, and same policy) have their border demarcated, so why not eritrea and ethiopia have a demarcated border considering ethiopia’s bloody history on eritreans.but the problem is meles’ regime again, he feels as if he give badme to eritrea (EEBC decision), he would lose his people (tigray people) trust. so he wants to stay on power by extending, giving all sorts of excuses and lieing to the world.

      repondre message

    • 23 November 2012 11:01, by vbolfildones

      As part of an assignment for research I have to find an article with relevant information on this topic and give the teacher our opinion and the article. Your article helped me a lot.
      Online life insurance

      repondre message

Comment on this article

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

The political calculations of Sudan’s military regime 2019-04-22 20:37:26 How Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir was overthrown and what happens next in Sudan By Ahmed H Adam* On April 11, after 30 years in power, the longstanding dictator, General Omar al-Bashir, was (...)

Will the military or the people lead Sudan? 2019-04-22 16:25:04 Support by regional and international partners will be critical to address the economic crisis, as well as the reformation of government institutions, ministries and security agencies By Ahmed (...)

Will uprising in Sudan provide a new political dispensation? 2019-04-20 06:25:31 By Luka Kuol* The recent wave of uprising in some African countries shows the new means of contesting the African rulers who stayed in power for so long and are hardly to be unseated through the (...)


Latest Press Releases

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)

Joseph Malwal Dong joined the SPLM/A -IO 2019-04-02 08:35:02 SPLM/A (IO) Press Release 1/4/2019 On Hon. Joseph Malwal Dong Joined the SPLM/A (IO) The leadership of the SPLM/A (IO) would like to seize this precious opportunity to announce to members and (...)

Sudan Protests: Investigate the custodial death of three University students 2019-03-13 12:53:14 The African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies (ACJPS) Sudan Protests: Urgent call for investigations into the custodial death of three University students and alleged torture of detainees by (...)


Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.