Home | Documents    Saturday 29 April 2006

TEXT- Darfur Peace Agreement: A just peace or peace at all costs?


By John A. Akec*

April 38, 2006 (LONDON) — The government of Sudan and Darfur armed Movements have been given 48 hours ending Friday night to present opinion on a draft Darfur Peace Agreement proposed by African Union mediators after more than two years of grilling negotiations. If signed, it will put an end to a devastating war that broke out in January 2002 and which has claimed more than 300,000 lives and displaced 1.5 million people from their homes.


The agreement offers Darfur Movements a position of
Senior Assistant to the President in the Government of
National Unity (GONU), who will be the fourth
highest-ranking official in the government and will
exercise wide powers and political influence. SLA/M
and JEM will nominate 3 persons among whom the
President will choose a Senior Assistant. An Advisor
to the President from Darfur will also be appointed by
the Senior Assistant to the President.


According to the Draft Peace Agreement seen by
this author, a Transitional Darfur Regional Authority
(TDRA) will be set up that will be charged with
responsibility of implementing Darfur Peace Agreement
(DPA), supervising reconstruction and economic
development, and helping in return and resettlement of
the refugees. It will consist mainly of the Senior
Assistant to the President, the Governors of the three
Darfur States, Heads of the Darfur Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Commission, Darfur Reconstruction and
Development Fund, Darfur Land Commission, Darfur
Security Commission, and Darfur Peace and
Reconciliation Council. SLA/M and JEM will have
representatives in TDRA. Also, a nominee of SLA/M and
JEM will be governor of one of 3 Darfur States, in
addition to 2 cabinet ministers and 1 advisor to the
governor in each of the 3 states. The Senior Assistant
to the President will head Transitional Darfur
Regional Authority (TDA)


Darfur Movements will also have three state ministers in
the federal government, one cabinet minister in the
executive of Khartoum State, in addition of four
cabinet ministers already held by Darfurians in the
government of national unity. The Darfur Movements
will also occupy 12 seats in the National Legislative
Assembly .


In wealth sharing, the share of Darfur will be worked
out by a new body called Fiscal and Financial
Allocation and Monitoring Commission (FFAMC) that will
be formed as part of this agreement. FFAMC will be an
independent body that will make recommendations about
the formula to be used for funds allocations to the
President and the National Legislative Assembly. A
Panel of Experts aid FFAMC in its work. Members of the
Panel will be nominated by FFAMC and approved by the
National Legislative Assembly. Darfur will be
appropriately represented. Mechanisms have been
deigned into FFAMC in order to protect its
independence against government interference.

To speed up reconstruction process of the war ravaged
region, Darfur will receive a payment of US$ 300
million from the National Account Fund in 2006, and
another two consecutive payments of US$ 200 million in
2007 and 2008. This is in addition to its allocation
from National Account as will be determined by the


There will be a referundum by July 2010 at the latest
in which Darfurians will decide between the
amalgamation of current three Darfur States into one
administrative unit called Darfur Region, or retaining
the status quo of three self-governing Darfur States
with no Region. There will also be a boundary
commission to delinate Darfur’s North-South boundary
as of first of January 1956.


The SLM/A and JEM combatants will be disarmed,
demobilised, or redeployed. Those qualified and
competent will be integrated into Sudan Armed Forces.
The agreement calls for fair representation of
Darfurians at all levels of Sudan Armed Forces and
security organs. The combatants who will be integrated
into Sudan Armed Forces will not be transferred away
from Darfur region in the next 5 years and are
protected from being laid off by any new redundancy
plans in the armed forces over that same period. The
government of Sudan will also be required to downsize
its forces in Darfur and in border with Chad. The
process will be heavily monitored and policed by
Security Commission through African Union Mission in
Sudan (AMIS).

Since April 2004, the government of Sudan has been
negotiating with Sudan Liberation Movement/Army and
Justice and Equality Movement to bring a peaceful end
to war in Darfur. In March 2006, the UN and African
Union peace mediators gave Darfur warring parties a
deadline to reach an agreement by 30th April 2006. On
Tuesday 25th April 2006, the AU’s chief mediator,
Salim Ahmed Salim, presented to the government of
Sudan, and the Darfur Movements with a draft peace
agreement which he described as ’balanced and fair" to
all the parties. All the parties were given 48 hours
to respond to AU draft proposals.

Both the SLM/A and JEM demanded for the position of
vice president (currently held by Ali Osman Taha), the
governorship of Khartoum State, 8 federal cabinet
ministers, and a single Darfur State (or region)
instead of the current 3 unconnected but
self-governing states. In addition, SLA and JEM are
demanding compensation for each individual who
suffered loss in the war.

On its part, the NCP dominated government of Sudan is
ready to make concessions without compromising its 52
percent majority in the National Assembly, and the
post of vice president, and argues that administering
Darfur as 3 states will bring power closer to people.

One glaring problem with this agreement is that SLA/M
and JEM combined will still lack the majority to
decidedly influence policies in the 3 Darfur States to
achieve their goals for taking up arms. Hence, while
Darfur Movements will be represented in the
government, they cannot dictate the terms to the
current Darfur states administration that was
installed by the government of Sudan. This situation
is unlike that of the Government of Southern Sudan
where 70 percent of the executive and Legislative
Assembly, and executive and legislative of branches of
10 Southern States, are held by the SPLM.

Furthermore, the agreement talks about what will be
done and how it will be done. It does not give
specific numbers or targets or how much is good
enough. This is a great weakness as it leaves much to
be decided in future. It is potential minefield for
conflict, greed, and dishonesty. In order to succeed,
the implementation of the agreement will demand very
close involvement of the international partners and
third parties to verify, interpret, or arbitrate

In fact, this agreement with its dependence on third
parties to monitor compliance with terms of the
agreement, it will open up Sudan to the greatest
international community ever.

Sudan government is optimistic that a deal will be
struck on Sunday 30 April 2006, which is the deadline
set by the UN to warring parties in Darfur to reach an
agreement. SLA/M leader Abdalwaheed Al-Nur said that
it would be impossible to sign the draft agreement as
it leaves out much of Movements demands, specially
that related to the position of the vice president. As
of Friday night, JEM was yet to send their comments on
the draft agreement to the AU mediators.

Implemented correctly, the agreement can bring justice
and peace. And without spelling out how much is just,
it leaves the agreement hanging on the good faith of
the government of Sudan and the willingness of the
international community to closely get involved. And
that is a minefield.

It should go without saying that much energy has been
injected into the negotiating process since the vice
president Ali Osman Taha joined the Abuja peace talks
earlier this month. The miracle maker that he is,
there could still be many surprises in the pipeline
that could dramatically change the situation between
now and Sunday, 30 April 06.


* Sudanese Political Analyst based in London.http://johnakecsouthsudan.blogspot.com/

Word - 407 kb
Draft of Darfur Peace Agreement
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

Comment on this article


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

Referenda in Scotland and South Sudan told a tale of two cities 2014-09-21 06:01:02 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman September 20, 2014 - This article comes against the backdrop of the referendum in Scotland and southern Sudan in the years 2014 and 2011, respectively, and the result was (...)

Undermining South Sudanese expertise’s is ironical! 2014-09-19 10:15:59 By Peter Gai Manyuon September 18, 2014 - The recent order from the Ministry of Labor and Public Service in the Republic of South Sudan that was issued on 16th of September 2014 is absolute (...)

Sudan - Colliding interests 2014-09-16 10:04:11 By Mohamed Elshabik September 15, 2014 - Sudan seems to be unconcerned by the current political crisis in the region. Amid a prognosis of full-scale war in South Sudan, unrest in Egypt, chaos in (...)


Latest Press Releases

Sudan Democracy First Group: Art as resistance – art as resilience 2014-09-09 12:34:15 Sudan Democracy First Group Art as Resistance – Art as Resilience September 8, 2014 - To mark the third anniversary of the resumption of civil war in Blue Nile and Nuba Mountains/South Kordofan, (...)

Sudan: Those behind unlawful killings and torture of protesters must be brought to justice 2014-09-03 13:13:43 Amnesty International Sudan: Those behind unlawful killings and torture of protesters must be brought to justice The brutal suppression of protest in Sudan must end, and members of the security (...)

National Dialogue in Sudan: Past experiences and current challenges 2014-08-27 06:18:22 Sudan Democracy First Group (SDFG) Since independence, Sudan has undergone a number of national peace agreements, some of which were observed and honored for short periods, others which were (...)


Copyright © 2003-2014 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.