Home | News    Wednesday 25 January 2006

AU rights commission challenges African leaders

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

Jan 25, 2006 (KHARTOUM) — An African human rights commission has criticised the continent’s worst rights offenders, including Sudan and Zimbabwe, in a report analysts say marks a "coming of age" for the organisation.

JPEG - 13.5 kb
Fatuma Adam Bisham arrived in Zamzam camp in North Darfur six months ago after her village came under attack by armed men. All she brought with her were her three children and her donkey. (WFP).

The African Union’s commission issued candid reviews of Ethiopia, Eritrea, Sudan, Zimbabwe, Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo in the report, obtained by Reuters on Wednesday.

Those countries said they wanted a chance to reply before the report became public, ensuring it remained confidential.

"If the African Union is to have a strong voice it has to foster constructive criticism, not bury it," said Reed Brody from the New York-based Human Rights Watch.

The report expressed concern at "the intimidation of independent judges and the interference of the executive in the judiciary" in Zimbabwe.

It also expressed alarm at the number of people displaced because of government demolitions and urged Harare to immediately stop the policy which has made 700,000 people homeless.

It condemned Eritrea for arbitrary arrests and long detentions of ex-ministers, journalists and parliamentarians, and demanded their immediate release.

In Ethiopia it called for the release of political prisoners and said it "deplored the death of civilians during confrontations with security forces". It also urged an inquiry into the clashes over elections last year.

Summit host Sudan, snubbed for the chairmanship because of atrocities in its western Darfur region, was urged to immediately cease all attacks on civilians and to support aid workers trying to feed 2 million refugees.

Sudan should fully cooperate with the International Criminal Court (ICC), which is probing alleged war crimes, the commission said. Sudan says it will not let ICC investigators enter Darfur.

The AU is reluctant to criticise members, but at a summit this week it elected judges for an African human rights court and fought a fierce diplomatic battle not to allow host Sudan to become its head, showing it would no longer ignore atrocities.

One AU official said this report was a challenge to member states and proof the rights commission was a serious organ.

"Here we see how sensitive our member states are to criticism, but the commission is finally fulfilling its mandate and challenging them," said the AU official, who declined to be named because the report was not yet public.

"The states will get their chance to comment but then the reports will be released," he added.

Brody said this was a sign of maturity in the AU rights commission. "The African commission is coming of age. Now it is the African Union’s turn to do so," he said.

(Reuters)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


South Sudan: parliamentary or presidential system 2019-11-20 11:27:09 By Jacob K. Lupai This article on the parliamentary system in comparison with the presidential system with reference to South Sudan sets out to answer the question: is parliamentary or (...)

What federal system is suitable for South Sudan? 2019-11-12 11:06:55 By Dr Jacob K. Lupai* Introduction Federalism is seen as a constitutional arrangement for dividing power between different levels of government so that federated states, regions or provinces can (...)

Differences between Sudan government, SRF and FFC are the main issues of concern 2019-11-09 11:17:17 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman As the proverb goes, the difference of opinion does not spoil amity and does not spoil the friendliness issue. On the other hand, mere differences of point of view and (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.