Home | Comment & Analysis    Tuesday 16 December 2003

Darfur: "Ethnic Cleansing," Mass Displacement, Civilian Slaughter Require Action


By Eric Reeves

December 16, 2003 — All evidence presently available, from an increasing number of sources, suggests that the National Islamic Front regime in Khartoum is using the denial and manipulation of humanitarian access as a weapon of war in the western province of Darfur. The targets of this "weapon" are the
African peoples of Darfur, primarily the Masseleit, Fur, and Zaghawa
tribal groups, perceived by Khartoum as the civilian base for the
current military insurgency in this long-marginalized region.
Deployment of such a savage "weapon" is nothing new on Khartoum’s part;
indeed, it has been a hallmark of the regime’s war on the people of
southern Sudan for many years. But continued international acquiesce in
the deliberate destruction of innocent civilians through the denial of
emergency of medical and food aid is morally intolerable.

It is already past time for the international community to coalesce
around a policy that makes clear to Khartoum that "national sovereignty"
does not trump the urgent needs of desperate people. Unless the
National Islamic Front immediately removes all restrictions on
international relief aid, there must be a robust humanitarian
intervention in Darfur, with all necessary military protections. Given
the nature of the impending human destruction, and the growing
descriptions of that destruction as based on ethnicity---"ethnic
cleansing" is the term diplomats and others are increasingly
using---there is clear justification for such a policy. Though
"humanitarian intervention" has proved in recent years to be a
thoroughly vexed issue, the nature of the growing crisis in Darfur, with
many hundreds of thousands of civilians at clear risk because of
Khartoum’s brutal war policies, justifies such intervention on the basis
of virtually all extant analyses.

Though there is much that is presently unknown about the crisis in
Darfur, recent UN humanitarian assessments, assessments by other
humanitarian organizations, as well as first-hand research by human
rights groups, fully justify the ominous conclusions of senior UN
officials. Despite the fact that the "humanitarian situation in Darfur
has quickly become one of the worst in the world," humanitarian access
has been shut down and manipulated to the point where the UN
secretary-general’s envoy for humanitarian affairs in Sudan has declared
that for all practical purposes humanitarian activities have come to a
"standstill." Another senior official has very recently suggested
that the motive for denying humanitarian access is to prevent the
witnessing of crimes against humanity and genocide.

Further, again according to senior UN officials, civilians are being
"systematically" targeted, even as humanitarian access to these
people is being "systematically" denied. The "system" is quite clearly
based on race and ethnicity. The number of civilians displaced within
Darfur and into Chad is now 700,000, with a war-affected population of 1
million. (For full citations of UN sources, see previous analyses of
Darfur crisis from this source, December 9 and 12, 2003; available upon

Invoking the terrible famine in Bahr el-Ghazal province in 1998, Save
the Children (UK) has recently reported that "current overall
malnutrition rates are reported to be alarmingly high, with Global Acute
Malnutrition rates reaching 25% in some of the affected areas of Darfur,
which are accessible to relief workers" ("Sudan Emergency Statement,"
December 10, 2003). The International Crisis Group notes that
"government-supported militias deliberately target civilians from the
Fur, Zaghawa, and Massalit groups, who are viewed as ’African’ in Darfur"
and that the latest attacks by these Khartoum-backed Arab militias
"occurred deep inside the Fur tribal domain, against unprotected
villages with no apparent link to the rebels other than their ethnic
profile" (ICG, "Sudan: Towards and Incomplete Peace, December 11,

Will the international community wait until the people of Darfur are
dying by the thousands? by the tens of thousands? When will
destruction of these African lives morally command a response? Will
Khartoum’s assertion of "national sovereignty" be sufficient to keep
present humanitarian operations in this desperate arena at a
"standstill," the word used by the UN secretary-general’s Special
Envoy for Humanitarian Affairs for Sudan? If this is not an occasion
for robust "humanitarian intervention," why not?

Too many questions, receiving too little in the way of answers. Every
day that passes without a forceful articulation of international resolve
to respond in Darfur is another day that convinces the Khartoum regime
that there is no such resolve. Either there is a clear indication to
Khartoum that a robust humanitarian intervention is imminent, or the
slide toward massive catastrophe in Darfur will only accelerate.

- Eric Reeves
- Smith College
- Northampton, MA 01063

The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

Pragmatic patriarchy of Sudan over South Sudan 2018-09-22 09:28:17 James Okuk, PhD “We honour the human capacity to manage our collective lives with peace and even, at times, dignity” – Barbour & Wright The political process of Sudan and South Sudan has (...)

Salient features of South Sudan latest peace deal 2018-09-21 05:36:06 By Roger Alfred Yoron Modi Last week, the government of South Sudan under President Salva Kiir, various armed and unarmed opposition groups and other parties, including the SPLM/A-IO led by Dr (...)

Open letter to South Sudan Civil Aviation Authority 2018-09-19 04:05:10 By Telar Ring Deng On the cold morning of 9th September 2018, we were all in utter shock and bewilderment at the very tragic accident that occurred in Eastern Lakes State when a Plane crashed (...)


Latest Press Releases

Unity State community in Kenya supports Khartoum peace agreement 2018-08-17 08:33:21 PRESS STATMENT 14th Aug, 2018 Re: We shall Rally behind Khartoum Peace Agreement The Unity State Community Association in Kenya was established in 2010 to organize and mobilize the people of (...)

The Suspension of Hurriyat Online Newspaper 2018-04-29 07:04:37 Sudan Democracy First Group 28 April 2018 The Sudanese civil and political circles and those concerned with Sudan were shocked by the news that the management of Hurriyat online newspaper has (...)

Petition on the Deteriorating Human Rights and Humanitarian Situation in Sudan 2018-04-22 10:01:20 UN Secretary-General, New York African Union Commission, Addis Ababa UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva Petition on the Deteriorating Human Rights and Humanitarian Situation in Sudan (...)


Copyright © 2003-2018 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.