Home | News    Monday 12 September 2005

Nigeria, South Africa eye UN Security Council reform

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

Sept 12, 2005 (LAGOS) — African heavyweights Nigeria and South Africa headed to this week’s historic U.N. meeting indicating they were prepared to compromise on Security Council reform, among several topics on a packed summit agenda that are of great interest to the continent.

Failure to compromise during negotiations in the lead-up to the three-day summit, which opens Wednesday, helped ensure that Security Council reform was relegated to the sidelines. There was more than enough to engage Africans, with poverty, peacemaking and other issues on the formal agenda. But many of the continent’s leaders see securing a permanent seat on the powerful council as a way to get listened to on the international stage.

The Security Council currently has 15 members. Ten are elected for two-year terms and five permanent members - the U.S., U.K., Russia, China and France - have veto power.

The African Union demands two permanent, veto-wielding seats for Africa. An A.U. summit in August failed to reach a compromise with the so-called Group of Four - Japan, Brazil, Germany and India - that has proposed Africa get two permanent seats but no veto power.

The A.U. stuck with its original demand, and even voted to reject any Security Council reforms that didn’t expand the number of veto-wielding seats.

The three main contenders for Africa’s seats are big powers on the continent: Nigeria, Egypt and South Africa. Others also have expressed interest, including Senegal, Algeria and Kenya.

Africa "is demanding more than it would appear that the U.N. members or the U.N. system is capable of giving," said Greg Mills, of the Brenthurst Foundation, a South African think tank.

Despite the A.U. vote, both Nigeria - which currently chairs the pan-African body - and South Africa concede compromise may be necessary.

"The issue of the veto or not is something that will be determined by the United Nations itself," said Femi Fani-Kayode, a spokesman for Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo. "Our position is that it is best for us to be there, rather than insisting on a veto."

Giving Africa Security Council seats, with or without a veto, "would recognize that Africa has come of age," he said.

In a speech before his Parliament on Thursday, South African President Thabo Mbeki said: "I don’t believe our approach would be that we are making a demand and if the demand is not met, we walk away and go home."

But Mbeki added he saw little chance of agreement at the summit on an issue that requires support from the five current permanent members. The U.S. has said it only wants "two or so" new permanent council members, while China opposes a permanent seat for Japan.

Hermann Hannekom of the Africa Institute in Pretoria, South Africa said that Security Council reforms are likely to be tackled after the other main issues on the agenda.

Chances for agreement on how to fight poverty, crucial for African and other developing nations, were increased by key compromises the U.S. offered last week.

The U.S. had been widely criticized for seeking to eliminate references in any summit agreement to the Millennium Development Goals, among them cutting extreme poverty by half, ensuring universal primary education and stemming the AIDS pandemic, all by 2015. But Washington now is ready to accept reference to the goals.

The U.S. also had sought to delete a call for rich nations to spend 0.7% of their gross national product on development aid. While U.S. President George W. Bush has almost doubled international assistance, the U.S. spent just 0.16% of GNP on development aid in 2004, according to a recent U.N. report.

The U.S. now says that while it doesn’t accept the 0.7% target, it accepts the importance of including a reference in the final document.

Leaders were also to consider committing the world to taking collective action to protect people against genocide.

The U.S., Russia, India and Brazil are either providing lukewarm support or openly opposing the proposal "designed to stop genocides like Rwanda from ever happening again," Oxfam, a U.K.-based aid and development group, said in a statement last month.

More than 500,000 people, mostly ethnic Tutsis, were killed in that 1994 African genocide.

Influential African nations - including Nigeria, South Africa and Kenya - back moves to ensure intervention in future cases of large-scale abuses, said Brendan Cox, an Oxfam spokesman in London. One African nation opposed to the idea, however, is Sudan, itself accused by some - including the U.S. - of carrying out genocide in its western Darfur region.

The summit will also be a chance for sideline talks on such issues as Zimbabwe, whose President Robert Mugabe was to address the meeting.

The U.N. is struggling to reach agreement with Mugabe’s government on an appeal for funds to help hundreds of thousands of people evicted from slums. U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan has indicated a willingness to visit Zimbabwe, and U.N. Undersecretary-General Ibrahim Gambari has said the trip might be arranged during the summit.

Gambari also said the U.N. will address Somalia, an eastern African nation in disarray since clan-based warlords overthrew a dictator in 1991 and then turned on each other. A transitional government formed in exile in Kenya last year raised some hope, but its attempts to even move to Somalia, let alone lead the country, have been undermined by internal feuding.

(AP/ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


s
Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Open letter to South Sudan Civil Aviation Authority 2018-09-19 04:05:10 By Telar Ring Deng On the cold morning of 9th September 2018, we were all in utter shock and bewilderment at the very tragic accident that occurred in Eastern Lakes State when a Plane crashed (...)

Sudanese have become prey of mercenaries and Janjawid militias 2018-09-17 09:59:30 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman The Janjaweed bandits have been raging in the land of Darfur in particular and Sudan in general with corruption, havoc and destruction, more than a decade on. The (...)

Khartoum’s peace agreement: A looming disaster 2018-09-15 07:42:34 By Duop Chak Wuol Throughout the South Sudanese peace process, the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-In Opposition (SPLM-IO) has been faced with serious political issues. These issues make it (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


Unity State community in Kenya supports Khartoum peace agreement 2018-08-17 08:33:21 PRESS STATMENT 14th Aug, 2018 Re: We shall Rally behind Khartoum Peace Agreement The Unity State Community Association in Kenya was established in 2010 to organize and mobilize the people of (...)

The Suspension of Hurriyat Online Newspaper 2018-04-29 07:04:37 Sudan Democracy First Group 28 April 2018 The Sudanese civil and political circles and those concerned with Sudan were shocked by the news that the management of Hurriyat online newspaper has (...)

Petition on the Deteriorating Human Rights and Humanitarian Situation in Sudan 2018-04-22 10:01:20 UN Secretary-General, New York African Union Commission, Addis Ababa UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva Petition on the Deteriorating Human Rights and Humanitarian Situation in Sudan (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2018 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.