Home | News    Friday 17 December 2004

Sudan’s Darfur inquiry threatens fresh controversy over international court

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By Mark Turner, The Financial Times

NEW YORK, Dec 17, 2004 — European and US United Nations ambassadors are struggling to head off what could be their most pointed battle yet over the International Criminal Court, as a UN commission of inquiry prepares to report in January on alleged genocide in Sudan’s Darfur region.

JPEG - 12.9 kb
A woman carries water in Arara camp

According to diplomats, even if the inquiry does not determine genocide has occurred, it is likely to cite evidence of atrocities and prompt calls for criminal proceedings against the perpetrators.

Assuming Sudan does not take action itself, that would leave the UN Security Council with two options: an ad hoc tribunal, such as those for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, or referring the matter to the newly formed International Criminal Court (ICC).

Many countries feel ad hoc tribunals have proved too expensive, and European diplomats say it is time to put the ICC at the heart of UN justice policy. But the United States has adamantly opposed Security Council support for the ICC, which it fears could be used to prosecute US citizens for political reasons.

Diplomats warn an unseemly clash of ideologies could ensue. "Sudan is coming down the road towards us. Chances are this inquiry will make a recommendation that goes directly against US policy," said one UN diplomat. "The crunch is going to come on Sudan," said another.

So far the Security Council has resisted open hostilities over the issue, although there was disagreement over an investigation into massacres in Burundi. But diplomats suggest Europe could take a tougher stance over Sudan, including forcing a vote.

That could leave the US with the difficult choice of abandoning its position, or vetoing international justice for Sudan.

This month, a high-level panel on UN reform stoked the debate by urging the Security Council to use its power to refer cases to the court. "The Security Council should stand ready to refer cases to the ICC," it said.

European ambassadors recently decried disagreement over the ICC during a debate over protecting civilians in armed conflict, saying it undermined efforts to end impunity for human rights abusers.

"The Security Council’s work is considerably limited by this division. It’s a real problem," said Jean-Marc de la Sabliere, France’s UN ambassador.

"When procedures against those responsible for massive violations cannot be taken by the state in question, the international community must react, unanimously."

There are signs that Britain, which supports the court but has proved wary of irritating the US, will show new resolve - although the Foreign Office in London is still undecided whether to push the issue over Sudan.

Efforts are under way to find a compromise. Gunter Pleuger, Germany’s ambassador to the UN, said it was important to build bridges with the US, while insisting Berlin was committed to the court. "We need to advance even further universal acceptance of the ICC’s jurisdiction," he told the Security Council.

John Danforth, the outgoing US ambassador to the United Nations, told the FT he was looking for a way around the problem.

"This has been such a thorn in everyone’s side, it would be nice if we could figure out a mutually satisfactory way of resolving the issue," he said.

That would require "a little conversation both in Washington and here". Diplomats have taken recent statements by Mr Danforth as an olive branch, but are uncertain whether Washington will follow.

According to Human Rights Watch, the advocacy group, the debate could be a watershed.

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


What federal system is suitable for South Sudan? 2019-11-12 11:06:55 By Dr Jacob K. Lupai* Introduction Federalism is seen as a constitutional arrangement for dividing power between different levels of government so that federated states, regions or provinces can (...)

Differences between Sudan government, SRF and FFC are the main issues of concern 2019-11-09 11:17:17 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman As the proverb goes, the difference of opinion does not spoil amity and does not spoil the friendliness issue. On the other hand, mere differences of point of view and (...)

Can women make the world more peaceful? 2019-11-06 11:31:03 By Paulino Akoon Yel Dut A genuine comprehensive analysis shows that involving women in peacebuilding increases the probability that violence will end in an easy manner. Hence we should thank (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.