Home page | News    Tuesday 31 January 2012

US calls for swift resolution of oil dispute between Khartoum and Juba

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

January 30, 2012 (WASHINGTON) – The United States (US) permanent representative to the United Nations (UN), Susan Rice, on Monday urged the neighbouring states of Sudan and South Sudan to quickly resolve their long standing dispute over oil.

JPEG - 21 kb
US permanent representative to the UN, Susan Rice, January 30, 2012 (UN)

Speaking to reporters following a closed United Nations Security Council (UNSC) meeting on South Sudan, Rice noted the decision by Khartoum to release four oil tankers carrying cargo belonging to Juba.

“We believe that four of the ships have now just been released, which is an overdue and important step.” Rice said.

“We hope that conditions can quickly be created so that the parties can sit at the table and finalise, as swiftly as possible, a permanent arrangement with respect to the oil and revenue sharing, without which both sides will suffer and the loss of oil revenue will be crippling to all”, she added.

The landlocked nation of South Sudan halted production of its oil and the exportation of it through the north’s pipeline to Port Sudan in a dramatic escalation of a dispute over the payment of transit fees.

Juba further claims that Khartoum has confiscated US$815 million worth of its oil since last year.

Sudanese officials justified their move by saying that the negotiations on oil transit fees have yielded no results and that they can no longer wait given the economic crisis in their country, resulting from the secession of the south which contained 75% of oil reserves.

Juba strongly resisted Khartoum’s call for US$36 per barrel in transit fees and so far all proposals tabled by the African Union High Level Implementation Panel (AUHIP) have received lukewarm backing from the two sides who kept pushing for amendments.

The leaders of Sudan and South Sudan met in a quartet summit organised over the weekend in Addis Ababa by Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi and attended by Kenyan president Mwai Kibaki, but talks broke down without any agreement.

Nonetheless, Sudanese president Omer Hassan al-Bashir heeded a request by Zenawi and ordered the immediate release of four oil tankers held by Khartoum since earlier this month as part of the dispute.

Khartoum called on Juba to reciprocate and reverse their decision to suspend oil production. South Sudanese officials however insist that the northern neighbour must return the “stolen” oil.

The US permanent representative to the UN also expressed her government’s “grave concern” on the “deteriorating” situation in the border states of South Kordofan and Blue Nile.

The World Food Program (WFP) said today that conflict and food shortages could force up to half a million Sudanese refugees to flee to South Sudan in the next few months if Khartoum does not allow aid agencies into the two states.

The U.S. warned this month that it will look into a launching unilateral operation to provide aid to affected population in these two states without Khartoum’s permission stressing that famine could ensue by March.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 31 January 08:44, by Lang

    It’s our oil, if we want to shut it down we can do that no other country or organization can force us to a shit deal with the terrorist government.
    Even if the north gets revenue from transit fees they will blow the money anyway on their mission to terrorize and kill all African people of the country.
    Southerners are watching GoSS don’t fall into a shit deal because of this one-sided pressure.

    Reply to this message

    • 31 January 08:56, by Lang

      "Sudan says to keep lifting S. Sudan oil until deal made" - Reuters 1/30/2012.
      Since they still want to continue stealing the oil there is more reason to not sit to negotiate over OUR oil.

      Reply to this message

      • 31 January 10:30, by Mi diit

        US should not be fooled by these Khartoum congenital liars and deceivers. Let them do the following first:
        1) Return all the stolen oil, 2) Make the transit fee $0.50 cents per barrel like the rest, 3) Demarcate the Sudan/South Sudan borders and 4) Allow Abyei to hold a fair referendum or return it to South Sudan by presidential decree. Any oil deal ignoring any of the four factors is a fake deal

        Reply to this message

      • 31 January 11:55, by Darkangel

        My stupid son with IQ and brain of a 6 yr old. You talk as if the oil is OURS. How much did the GOSS give you from YOUR oil, did it build you a school, hospital, road.. did it send you to UNI. When grown men talk - go play with you toys my illiterate, retarded son.

        Maybe when your older, ill let you know that YOU have nothing in South Sudan. It all goes to buy P. Kiir a new hat and gold watch. .

        Reply to this message

        • 31 January 12:18, by Logic

          Darkanger/ Master

          Universities in the north are a sham, schools are useless unless they’re private and N. Sudan boasts some of the worst public hospitals in the continent. The road contracts are awarded at 1500% above international rates and to NCP members/ supporters. The middle class is almost entirely made up of NCP sympathizers.

          Its you who sound like a 6 yr old. PATHETIC!

          Reply to this message

          • 31 January 12:56, by Darkangel

            Logic/Slave

            Keep your baseless, unsubstantiated and totally absurd claims. Prove any ONE of them i dare you. Get me 1 document/analysis which backs anything you say.

            SHOW ME FACTS - MR loud mouth all talk.

            As usual you only comment when you want to criticize the North. Spare Us your hollow, hate and war mongering speech’s.

            Why dont you go live in South Sudan for a week and give us feed back.

            Reply to this message

          • 31 January 16:33, by Lang

            hahaha graduating from a Khartoum university is like graduating from a junior college with a diploma.

            Reply to this message

          • 1 February 01:59, by pabaak

            African Union think that South Sudan oil is for free, so they can decided what quantity they can awarded to Sudan, this will not happen, we knew our rights,instead of addressing the problems such as, Abyei, Border, and paying highly transit fees for pipeline, they keep quiet and quickly asked South Sudan to release 6.5b dollar in addition to free flow of the oil to Khartoum, which is laughable.

            Reply to this message

  • 31 January 08:47, by Tamongali

    It seems to me USA is not for shutting down the oil production from my reading the following statement of susan Rice is contrading( “[We hope that conditions can quickly be created so that the parties can sit at the table and finalize, as swiftly as possible, a permanent arrangement with respect to the oil and revenue sharing, without which both sides will suffer and the loss of oil revenue will

    Reply to this message

    • 31 January 09:39, by Manh Baai

      I have never seen politic turning upside down if you turn to your supporters you think they will like your move but when it is in your best interest they will not agree. We suffer becuase USA was believe to b on South Side and when we take action they seem to be the first to blame South.

      No, no, no, oil is for south if they stop it it should not be other parties concern we know why we shoot it.

      Reply to this message

  • 31 January 09:25, by mohammed ali

    " To finalize" means the deal is already there and they have just to sign it!This is coming from Susan Rice and not from an Arab or a Jalabbi, which means that the deal is fair enough and it is not as Pagan claims.She must be taking account of the perlious consequences of shutting up the pipe-line to SS as I am sure she doesn’t care about Sudan!

    Reply to this message

    • 31 January 10:04, by Sir King

      Actually, oil is ours and we are right to shut it down if we find unfavourable behaviours from Khartoum. Look! Khartoum refuses to adopt international system of oil taxation and want to use their own system which can’t work completely. However we would like to build another pipeline to Kenya whereby we may base our agreement on international oil standard and forget about Khartoum. That is jealousy

      Reply to this message

    • 31 January 10:09, by eye-of-an-eye

      Mohamed Ali

      You know nothing what going about, USA has nothing to force South Sudan to share oil revenues with North, we knew what is going on in this right time, there will be a disaster very soon when anyone try to slip from the point where we are expecting to be. who ever double stand want to shade more blood in Sudan and South Sudan. Susan Rice was very mistaken on revenues sharing words.

      Reply to this message

      • 31 January 11:36, by Darkangel

        "....with respect to the oil and revenue sharing...."
        "....with respect to the oil and revenue sharing...."
        "....with respect to the oil and revenue sharing...."

        Like it or not .. this was agreed on since 2005. This is what stopped the war and got you your independence.
        Its not a choice ! The world was witness to this. But your small IQ, and tribal backward cow stealing mentality cant comprehend

        Reply to this message

        • 31 January 12:08, by Logic

          Here we go.... Darkanger/ Master

          As usual with his condescending mid-evil age IQ , cousin marrying and barbaric Islamic fundamental mentality can comprehend better than the natives of Sudan.

          Someone give him a medal please! lol.lol

          Go play with Corrector & Abo Dirty Jalabia, you waste of space!

          Reply to this message

          • 31 January 13:00, by Darkangel

            ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

            Cousin marrying ? At least we dont offer our wives to guests staying over.

            You dont have anything to contribute.

            Reply to this message

          • 31 January 14:06, by Corrector

            why soo angry little one?.. smile.. ur about to get #$%@ed

            Reply to this message

        • 31 January 21:22, by Elijah B. Elkan

          Mr. Darkangel,

          With all due respect, you’re an imbeciles. Your inbreed government officials are all mental. Khartoum could not win the war against the south Sudan, so let it go ...dude!. East Sudan, Darfur, Kordufan and Blue Nile will brake away from the north. Bashir and it’s cohorts are world most wanted criminals for the killing of their citizens and all should hang.

          Reply to this message

    • 31 January 10:11, by rock

      Ali no deal to be sign here, simply the demand that your government put forward has shown lack of business sense. as you always said pipeline is yours and it is yours right to set any price for it.so south Sudan does not want it any more and no matter what pressure that international community exert on us without proper deal then answer is no.because Khartoum is not interesting to do business

      Reply to this message

      • 31 January 15:04, by mohammed ali

        Rock,Eye, Baai, Sudan did not draft this agreement, it was drafted by international bodies under international standereds.Oil is certainly hundered percent yours, nobody could ever dispute that! But these transitional arrangments are something agreed upon intern standreds &the international community is uninamously endorsing them.Talking about international standereds now is futile!

        Reply to this message

    • 31 January 10:19, by Martin Garang Aher

      ’...conditions can quickly be created so that the parties can sit at the table and finalize, as swiftly as possible, a permanent arrangement with respect to the oil...’
      That is a faily loaded statement! We need border & Abyei arrangements so as to make a fair deal on oil. That is the meaning Mr. Ali. No deal!!

      Reply to this message

    • 31 January 13:13, by Force 1

      Yes, the deal is there and all South Sudan need to do is throw it in the trash!

      Reply to this message

  • 31 January 09:46, by morogot batal

    RICE...we fear GOD up and UN down... you can experience from how we kept this stupid arabs as prissioners of war more than 600 and we handed to them after signing CPA...otherwise..we have routed them out sudan. They have killed all our POW INCLUDING THE MASCRE THAT HAD BEEN HAPPENING IN JUBA..WAU..MALAKAL...THEY KILLED CIVILIANS...POLICE...WILDLIFE...PRISION WADER...AND BURIED THEM INTO GROUPS....

    Reply to this message

  • 31 January 09:50, by Sudan virus

    Please Susan!The conditions are clear:
    1.Bashir must release Abyei.
    2.The boarder between Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan must be demarcated as ruled at the international Jurist at the Hague.
    3.Sudan must accept the most favorable fee in world on her side, $1 per barrel oil transit fee.
    4.Pay back the amount of the stolen oil over $800 million.
    5.Correct the deliberate errors made on account

    Reply to this message

    • 31 January 11:37, by Darkangel

      "....with respect to the oil and revenue sharing...."
      "....with respect to the oil and revenue sharing...."
      "....with respect to the oil and revenue sharing...."

      Like it or not .. this was agreed on since 2005. This is what stopped the war and got you your independence.
      Its not a choice ! The world was witness to this. But your small IQ, and tribal backward cow stealing mentality cant comprehend

      Reply to this message

    • 31 January 11:40, by Darkangel

      There are no conditions you virus ! No Abyei, No return or compensation. Keep the oil underground. Lets see how quickly the Americans can build your 3 yr $4 billion pipeline or if you have any oil left by then.

      These are the words of your drunk Pagan, who has no real strategy, all hes is good at is saying no. Lets wait and see. I DARE YOU - WILL SEE WHO WILL BACK DOWN FIRST !

      Reply to this message

      • 31 January 13:28, by Force 1

        Darkangel, we shutdown the pipeline and who is now kicking and screaming? We all know, it’s not South Sudan, and who do you think it is?

        Here is news flash! The pipeline is staying shut as long as it can be, do you know South Sudan fought for 20 plus years without oil and salaries? Look, we know what we have in the bank.

        Reply to this message

    • 31 January 14:11, by Corrector

      1. Bashir doesn’t own anything, it is not his country to release away whatever land he wants to release. People of KRT want abyei so they will keep it.
      2. Border must be defined by agreement to avoid further conflict.
      3. Sudan doesn’t have to accept that fee. South Sudan can explore other options and wish them the best of luck.
      4. no repayment. that was transit fee expenses incurred by S.Sudan.

      Reply to this message

  • 31 January 09:55, by Sudan virus

    6.Sign a valid agreement to transfer power to the opposition, witness by international community, so that we will have a hormonal relationship with the peace lovers in Khartoum not Bashir.

    Reply to this message

  • 31 January 10:08, by Sudan virus

    Susan! Getting rid of Dictators/Terrorist is like getting rid of diseases caused by virus, for example, if you want stop HIV/AIDS in the world, kill all people effected with the disease(virus).

    Otherwise you are wasting your time and those of the people yawning for peace(Sudanese).

    South Sudanese are free of the Sudan virus but the presence of the effected neighboring people ( Sudanese ) make no

    Reply to this message

    • 31 January 10:10, by Sudan virus

      make us not happy.

      Reply to this message

      • 31 January 10:59, by Lokorai

        Ms Ambassador,

        There is nothing ’swiftly’ to be reached with the rogue Republic called Sudan. Enough is enough, we aren’t returning there, understand.

        If your government won’t help us, we will find our help elsewhere!!!!

        Lokorai

        Reply to this message

      • 31 January 11:09, by Tamongali

        Mr. Sudan virus, at the beginning all of us thought USA is siding with S.Sudan even our politician thought USA or IMF will loan us money to monitor our economy till the pipeline is constructed.Now US is thinking differently and USA is IMF and IMF is USA.How is the way out?

        Reply to this message

      • 31 January 11:43, by Darkangel

        Does anyone have a fly spray for this bug ?

        Reply to this message

  • 31 January 11:36, by ILoveSudan

    South and its blind hatred to North...
    shooting one’es self in the foot and not even realise it??
    what a joke???

    Reply to this message

    • 31 January 11:47, by Darkangel

      Its really much simpler than that. Dont forget you are dealing with mercenaries, killers and bandits that came from the jungle. All the SPLM knows is to kill, loot and feed themselves.

      By doing this, they only guarantee their own survival. Politically - they focus people on one enemy instead of their blunders & failure. Economically - the money wont go to build or help desperate people. Instead.

      Reply to this message

      • 31 January 11:51, by Darkangel

        Any money given to them by the US or IMF can go directly to their bank accounts and not the government. Militarily the play the victims - ’the bad arabs want to attack us and occupy our oil’ - people would be to scared to support any rebellion and the nut evangelicals in America will push to help the South.

        I feel sorry for the peoples of South Sudan, honestly.

        Reply to this message

        • 31 January 12:18, by Sudan virus

          Darkangle!

          Better go to packet than to people who are killing their own fellow citizens.

          Reply to this message

  • 31 January 11:54, by ILoveSudan

    Darkangle true.. you have said it. Hope they realise it before it is too late.

    Reply to this message

    • 31 January 12:38, by Koang

      The misunderstandings,oil disputes were actual cuased by khartuom, in fact, it affects the south and as a result, it led to shut down of oil company operations.
      NORTH, wanted to benefit more from the oil than RoSS.
      Missunderstanding starts slow and sparks to real hatre.
      so step by step is need to sollves domestic issue!

      Reply to this message

  • 31 January 12:22, by Jalaby

    Jonobean,
    Like it or not, hate it or not, believe it or not, south will soon resume exporting its oil through north without Abyei going south, What Susan said is clear indirect message from US to the south that:resume exporting your oil through north we don’t have money to feed you!

    Reply to this message

    • 31 January 12:39, by Mi diit

      Jalaby,

      I couldn’t believe that you are so naive. Read between the lines. US companies want to take oil from the Chinese companies. Can your retarded mind tell you they don’t want it shut down and resumed in future with their companies. Susan Rice is just lullying North Sudan to a long sleep if you guys believe in her. You are so naive. Just watch events unfold in Blue Nile and Nuba mountains.

      Reply to this message

      • 31 January 12:47, by Jalaby

        Mi diit,
        No doubt US wants to replace china and have their companies onboard but they want to do it in a legal way not by force because China can sue both US companies and GoSS in international courts and stop them and get billion dollars of their loss money!
        Remember, US economy in a terrible situation now and has no money to feed the south everday!

        Reply to this message

        • 31 January 18:47, by morogot batal

          your mind of robbing,looting,killing make you talk like the oil is yours....you may 4goten that you will be going with your chinese in the international court

          Reply to this message

      • 31 January 15:26, by mohammed ali

        Mi diit, you are wrong US want to get a share from Sudan oil and not SS oil, believe it or not.They were hoping that SPLA would have succeded in runing SS & eventually compete for power in Khartoum.SPLA failed & is failing them miserably.Now they just want to get rid of you, and pursue their own vital interest.Donnot be so romantic and fall in love with them, that is so naive.This is the USA!!

        Reply to this message

        • 31 January 15:37, by mohammed ali

          Mi diit, Sudan got much more oil reserves than WE & not only you could imagine.This was confirmed by the recent reports in the media.Building their biggest embassy in Khartoum,big attention by top diplomates is not for the sake of our beautiful eyes.Did you ever heared USA offered to build you a pipe-line,they could if they want! But the idea hadn’t even cross their mind!WHY?Four 320 000 bpd only!

          Reply to this message

  • 31 January 12:32, by Jalaby

    Yesterday GoSS decided to cut states governors salaries by half referring to oil production pause and halt, the treasury is empty and there is no salary for the coming months cross all the levels and sections in S. government, GoSS has received nothing than promises from some investors who promised to build pipeline that cost $12 billion..

    Reply to this message

    • 31 January 12:41, by Mi diit

      Jalaba, so you are not only naive but also a liar. Get a life buddy. Why panicking?

      Reply to this message

    • 31 January 12:45, by Koang

      Jalaby, please shut a HELL up. u know nothing!!

      Reply to this message

  • 31 January 12:40, by Jalaby

    within one year!! $12 billion is big amount and with US crisis economy I doubt this money will be available within one year, adding instabled and insecured south that full of conflicts will allow this project to see the light anytime soon!
    I think GoSS will soon knock Arab/Jalaba door with no shame asking for using their pipeline!
    Jalaby (Abo Tagia)

    Reply to this message

  • 31 January 13:11, by mosa mel

    I really appreciate your concern on South Sudan and Sudan situation. Khartoum government is evil government and need more pressure from powerful organization or nation such as UN an USA. keep going our sister. God bless you and your work and God bless USA.

    Reply to this message

  • 31 January 15:01, by pabaak

    The position of US is clear that they don’t want the deal out of international standard, So those supporters of theft in Khartoum hope US will strike a deal for them are fools. stay with your pipeline and we stay with our oil.

    Reply to this message

  • 31 January 20:52, by Anynya One

    I stand with Logic! wish ya go smoothly and a happy New Ending...bye bye it Is a New Born King a Nu Born Majesty... Bye Emmanuel we embrace U!

    Reply to this message

    • 31 January 23:46, by Darkangel

      http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0ece7e2c-...
      THE FINANCIAL TIMES

      South Sudan rejects African Union oil plan

      Read it !! It shows that its South Sudan and particulatly Pagan who is causing everyone grief !! As you heard from the AU,US China and EU all agree with the plan. But Pagan doesnt know what to say but ’they are stealing our oil and they are bad to us’

      Reply to this message

  • 1 February 09:45, by Monster

    Returning 4 tankers, is Bashir not revealing to the world that he n his tyrannical government are worse than even the Somali Pirates, our warning remain, Bashir must turn all our stolen oil, or else a devastating decision shall be taken against evil, and thieves brought to book

    Reply to this message

  • 1 February 10:42, by Monster

    Hahaha, time for the north to realize how important our oil revenue was to the country but they choose to devour with relish the oil got in an impure manner, the oil belong to us with our totalitarian decisions to decide, to hell with you pipe line, and that have earned living living blame from your master China, Please China, ask Bashir for compensation since the pipe line is now useless.

    Reply to this message

Reply to this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Is UNSC only legitimate to Sudan in complaint times? 2012-05-20 01:45:00 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 19, 2012 — Sudanese leaders seem to think they are smarter than anybody else in this world. They seem to recognize the legitimacy of the United Nations Security (...)

Sudan’s NCP, an obstacle to peaceful co-existence 2012-05-20 01:30:00 By Jacob K. Lupai May 19, 2012 — Peaceful co-existence is what is expected of people the world over in promoting security. Nevertheless, how does peaceful co-existence come about? There are many (...)

On the African Union road map and UN resolution 2046 2012-05-20 01:00:00 By Gamal Adam My 18, 2012 — The African Union’s recent road map which the United Nations Security Council has endorsed with the Resolution 2046 includes a clause that puts pressure on the Sudan (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Opposition leader under house arrest 2012-05-18 20:40:02 AI - Amnesty International Opposition leader under house arrest 18 May 2012 Ezdehar Jumaa Said Ahmad, a leader of the opposition Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North, is under house arrest. (...)

AI: SUDANESE JOURNALIST FACES HARASSMENT 2012-05-18 20:27:17 Amnesty International SUDANESE JOURNALIST FACES HARASSMENT 18 May 2012 Faisal Mohammed Salih, a prominent journalist and columnist from Sudan who had been arrested by the National Security (...)

AMNESTY: HEALTH CONCERNS FOR DETAINED ACTIVIST 2012-05-11 20:18:33 Amnesty International Health Concerns For Detained Activist - Bushra Gammar Hussein Rahma 11 May 2012 More than ten months after his arrest, Sudanese activist Bushra Gamar Hussein Rahma (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2012 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.