Home page | News    Tuesday 7 December 2010

Sudan’s North & South sign agreement on securing oilfields

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

December 6, 2010 (KHARTOUM) – The Sudan Armed forces (SAF) and the Sudan People Liberation Army (SPLA) on Monday signed a framework agreement on securing oilfields and related infrastructure in the South.

The accord states that the Joint Integrated Units (JIU) will continue their in accordance with the current security arrangements for the purposes of protecting the oilfields, companies and their employees as well as boosting the security situation in the region before and after the South Sudan referendum scheduled for early next month.

JIU will be joined by the security forces from the National Intelligence and Security Services (NISS) as well as South Sudan police.

The upcoming vote is part of a peace agreement that ended decades of civil war between the North and South and is widely expected to create the world’s newest state.

About 75 per cent of Sudan’s proven reserves of 6.3bn barrels are in the south but the pipeline that carries the oil to export terminals and refineries runs through the north. The south needs Khartoum’s co-operation to sell its oil; the north needs revenues from its neighbor’s resources.

Today’s agreement was signed by the Sudanese minister of defense Abdel-Rahim Mohamed Hussein and the SPLA affairs minister Nihal Deng in Falluj town in the Upper Nile State.

The ceremony was attended by Sudan’s 2nd Vice president Ali Osman Taha and South Sudan Vice president Riek Machar.

The agreement states that should the need arises JIU enforcements from other regions will be sent to the Unity and Upper Nile states. The term of the accord is good until July 9, 2011 based on the political directives of the partners after the referendum results are announced.

The two parties agreed on establishing a mechanism chaired by senior officials on both sides to observe implementation of the security plan and immediately intervene to contain any emergency incidents.

VP Taha said that the agreement underscores the intention of the Sudanese peoples to maintain durable peace in accordance with the directives of president Omer Hassan Al-Bashir and his First Vice President Salva Kiir who is also President of the Government of South Sudan (GoSS).

He said that the flow of oil represents the foundation of the Sudanese economy now and in the future, whatever be the outcome of the referendum might be.

The separation of Sudan into a two states will deny the North billions of dollars in revenue generating from vast oilfields in the south of the country. Currently the North and the South are splitting the proceeds of crude in accordance with the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) signed in 2005.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 7 December 2010 09:21, by Shadrack Nuer Machut

    Bravo both SAF and SPLA for having signed a contempoary accord to ease deteriorating condtions of innocent Sudansese on both sides of the coountry.

    It’s going to be enjoyable for a moment though this agreement won’t last longer.

    Whatever is discussed at the table produces a positive result and also enhances relationship even if the Country will split into two States.

    Let’s maintain peace by not conquering and looting people’s property as they are vulnerable to resist possesion of their belongings.

    Reply to this message

    • 7 December 2010 10:36, by william

      Please Mr. Nhial make sure the agreement you had signed with NCP NISS is aa total diaster to the southerners because is another tactful Khartuom had used to bring back to the south its army!!! Look south was said take there only police Please JIU is enough to safe gaurds the oilfield. No more arab military to be brought back to the south.

      Take caution!!!!!!!

      Reply to this message

      • 7 December 2010 21:07, by Ahmed Chol

        SPLA

        needs to reconsider this agreement, this is just a re-occupation of the south by SAF, think about it.

        Reply to this message

    • 7 December 2010 12:33, by okucu pa lotinokwan

      signing agreement with NCP is very easy issue but implementing agreement with NCP is some thing i do not have a language how to descript it. God Bless the agree sign in oilfield foluju.

      OKUCU PA LOTINOKWAN

      Reply to this message

    • 7 December 2010 20:02, by Ahmed Chol

      To Southerners and SPLA,

      Those who signed this agreement on the SPLA side have been deceived! This is just a way for SAF to come back into the South without knowledge of the UN. This is just one step for the NCP to bring back SAF into the south. The oil fields were already secured, what kind of security are they talking about? When you agree with the NCP to bring 10 policemen, they will bring 10,000 troops and army with tanks into the south. Watch and see.

      Ahmed Chol, the future commander of Anya-nya III if the south joins the north

      Reply to this message

  • 7 December 2010 09:24, by Thongjang Thongjang

    This agreement it’s the stupid thing SPLM/A ever sign! Why they allowed the enemy to continuing milking Southerners economy? My god! Rabbi Thongjang Thongjang.

    Reply to this message

  • 7 December 2010 09:38, by AUGUSTINO DENG

    Dr. Riek Machar & Nhial Deng Nhial are all confused element leaders who don’t even know what they are doing. How can you signed an agreement for securing oilfields? Why SPLA not securing it? If they afraid to confront the Arabs, then why they don’t leave the offices and hand them to other people who are ready to confront Arabs face to face? Riek Machar Teny was already a rebel and he can do whatever he wanted to do as Nhial Deng Nhial was a "semi" rebel too.

    Money have blind fooled the Southern Sudanese leader that they don’t even have an access to elaborate their right.
    Shame on them.

    By Augustino Deng. Jech la mer from Tharpam.

    Reply to this message

  • 7 December 2010 11:05, by Santino Nuan

    Thanks to both GOSS and NCP government for this agreement. I was personally worried that NCP will deceive SPLM/A in this bleak situation to propose the re-deployment of its occupant forces called Sudan Armed Forces in Oil Fields especially in our area of Paloich, Melut County.

    My message to NCP is that we Southerners are very peacefull than your northerners in the north. Look since the beginning of Oil operation, there was no single incident ever happened against Oil workers. Our people are very peaceful beyond description. Big trucks transport materials from Port Sudan to Melut County every day on the roads and no one has robbed any single driver or Oil wokers on the way. So, it is rediculous to talk about security while the Oil fields were already under the protection of South Sudan army (SPLA) for more than five years. Thanks to God that the Oil fields are not in the northern Sudan territories. If Oil was in the north, I think terrorists would have interrupted its smooth exploitation.

    Let us not be deceived again by NCP who of think of bad which they do but we don’t do. SPLA is capable to secure and protect Oil fields during upcoming referendum than the proposed joint integrated Units. Paloich or Melut County’s people in particular are peaceful and we don’t need any deployment of JIU. The philosophy of security says that any security or insecurity is always lies in the hnads and behaviour of ordinary citizens and not government. If people are peaceful than the whole situation will remain calm and secure regardless of deployment of army or not and but if people are argon or trouble makers, then the security situation always remains taught and insecure no matter how many soldiers are deployed in that particular area.

    Secondly, why is only addressing security of companies but what about the basic services in the areas where Oil is being excavated? Dr. Riek Machar Teny, the Vice President of GOSS and H.E Simon Kun Pouch, the governor of Upper Nile State have both addressed public in Melut town on Sunday, 5, December. They were given number of complaints by the citizens about the lack of basic services in Oil rich area of Melut. Are these demands of basic services promptly addressed by two Vices President in this meeting? Dr Riek promised or assured people during his speech that he will address installation of water, electricty and road. If I were Dr. Riek, I must refuse to return back to Juba unless one of the mentioned basic services installed before my departure. By doing that the people of Melut cannot forget Dr. Riek Machar whatever the situation would be. We are tired of empty promises. Thanks

    Santino Nuan Kur

    Reply to this message

    • 7 December 2010 12:04, by Genuine Leader

      my question here to both Goss vice president Teng And Nhail,

      is niss most trustful to protect peace and oilfields then SPLA? how sizeable of NISs will comprising in oilfields and who will supervising their activities.

      brothers of south Sudan ,let us pray and rely on God only since our leaders of south just understand the context word not the meaning and tactics of context.
      G,leader the future leader war without border with jalaba if unity expose onto spla.

      Reply to this message

    • 7 December 2010 18:18, by AAMA

      "My message to NCP is that we Southerners are very peacefull than your northerners in the north. Look since the beginning of Oil operation, there was no single incident ever happened against Oil workers. Our people are very peaceful beyond description. Big trucks transport materials from Port Sudan to Melut County every day on the roads and no one has robbed any single driver or Oil wokers on the way."

      While i don’t like to argue on peoples comments, i felt i had to do so here. I personally know several people who worked in oil field in the south and i have to tell you they really suffer from security issues driven by hate crimes and black mailing whenever security isn’t enough, some of them even left their jobs. So such a deal is necessary to secure the oil workers lives before securing income to the two greedy partners.

      Reply to this message

  • 7 December 2010 12:48, by Victory

    how trustful is niss?

    Reply to this message

  • 7 December 2010 13:06, by Victory

    point of correction(i mean SAF)why can the SPLM/A protect the oilfield by them self?and as for NCP ,how many agreements have you singed and did not put them into action or implementation?Abyei issue is what matter now in this crucial time not the oilfields....PLEASE SPLM do not allow to be foold by NCP.

    Reply to this message

  • 7 December 2010 13:09, by majak mayen

    I don’t agree with the deal sign by SPLA & NCP to put joint integrated units(JIU)into the oilfield. I don’t understand the reason behind the deal since SPLA have enough resources to proctect the oilfield without SAF intervention.

    i real don’t....
    i real don’t....
    i real don’t....

    Johnny

    Reply to this message

  • 7 December 2010 13:44, by marko malou

    SPLM/A leadership need to be very careful,this is a plan B!!!!!.

    Reply to this message

    • 7 December 2010 14:02, by Genuine Leader

      yes Malou something taut with Gosh plan B!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Reply to this message

      • 7 December 2010 15:14, by Kolnyang youth

        let SPLA soldiers take care of themselves ,other wise Sudan Army forces are ever liars they did not mind about the agreement signed as now they are violating CPA which was signed by both splm and ncp to implemented it.

        take care,take care about saf
        any way my bravo goes to those who signed the agreement and not those who will violate .

        bor town the beginning of liberation struggle

        Reply to this message

    • 7 December 2010 14:24, by Obol Sam Gabriel

      Infact,bravo to both arm forces the SAF and SPLA let it not be political tactic which normally the Khartoum used to do in order to milk us without feeding but let it be the beginning of new relationship between North and South Sudan even if after the outcome of the referendum which is scheduled on January 9 2011 of which the outcome is well known that will lead to South Independence.The North has been wasting their times of creating enemy on Southern Sudanese to over come the south but all in vain they failed according to analyst.My appeal is going to the two Governments in the North and South to put a site theirs differences so that the two countries get the total peace for the people of this nation but glutton will never forget how they used to cheat the innocent.Thank BY OBOL SAM KING COLLEGE LONDON

      Reply to this message

  • 7 December 2010 16:59, by Omoni Atari

    This is what i have been talking,northerners think that they are smarter than us.
    How come for olifields protection agreement to be signed for less than minute,and Abyei,border demarcations take years? so if we talk about anything that related to economy and is lying in south sudan,so is very easy for Arabs to inked.If all oilfields are located in northern sudan we would have been separated long time ago.
    Atari Omoni.

    Reply to this message

    • 7 December 2010 17:41, by Victory

      Omani.
      i agree with u, how come oilfield agreement takes place within a closing of an eye?while abyei issue takes years?this my be what is called plan ’B’ disccused by the advisor last week , SPLM need to be very carful & attentive to this matter.

      Reply to this message

  • 7 December 2010 17:50, by kaci-banno

    SPLM should avoid such a nonsense agreements, wasting time,papers and ink for no reason. From the day that CPA was signed until now NCP is the only beneficiary of the oil,Why we need agreement. Even the JIU is not considered by NCP. Some time I feel regretted to hear Dr. Reik to be a witness of oil areas agreement because he was the one who given chance for NCP to use oil fields in Unity state and Upper Nile when he signed agreement with Khartoum 1991.

    By: kaci-Ma-banno

    Reply to this message

  • 8 December 2010 03:58, by Deng E. Manyuon

    Security cooperation with the North at this stage is highly needed. It is practically hard for our gallant forces(SPLA) to control all pipe lines heading northward upto Port Sudan after separation. If it happens, that would be a clear violation of the neighbour’s sovereignty. Another econoic strategy is to be in place before getting rid of the North!! I personally applaud SPLA military strategy in this regard. That is professionalism.

    Deng

    Reply to this message

Reply to this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Is UNSC only legitimate to Sudan in complaint times? 2012-05-20 01:45:00 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 19, 2012 — Sudanese leaders seem to think they are smarter than anybody else in this world. They seem to recognize the legitimacy of the United Nations Security (...)

Sudan’s NCP, an obstacle to peaceful co-existence 2012-05-20 01:30:00 By Jacob K. Lupai May 19, 2012 — Peaceful co-existence is what is expected of people the world over in promoting security. Nevertheless, how does peaceful co-existence come about? There are many (...)

On the African Union road map and UN resolution 2046 2012-05-20 01:00:00 By Gamal Adam My 18, 2012 — The African Union’s recent road map which the United Nations Security Council has endorsed with the Resolution 2046 includes a clause that puts pressure on the Sudan (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Opposition leader under house arrest 2012-05-18 20:40:02 AI - Amnesty International Opposition leader under house arrest 18 May 2012 Ezdehar Jumaa Said Ahmad, a leader of the opposition Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North, is under house arrest. (...)

AI: SUDANESE JOURNALIST FACES HARASSMENT 2012-05-18 20:27:17 Amnesty International SUDANESE JOURNALIST FACES HARASSMENT 18 May 2012 Faisal Mohammed Salih, a prominent journalist and columnist from Sudan who had been arrested by the National Security (...)

AMNESTY: HEALTH CONCERNS FOR DETAINED ACTIVIST 2012-05-11 20:18:33 Amnesty International Health Concerns For Detained Activist - Bushra Gammar Hussein Rahma 11 May 2012 More than ten months after his arrest, Sudanese activist Bushra Gamar Hussein Rahma (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2012 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.