Home | News    Sunday 17 June 2012

Sudan’s Bashir accuses African mediation of manipulating disputed area map

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

June 16, 2012 (KHARTOUM) - President Omer Al-Bashir rapped the secretariat of the African Union (AU) mediation team saying its members added a new zone to the map of disputed areas without Sudan’s agreement or informing their chairman of this addition.

JPEG - 24.7 kb
Sudanese President Omer Hassan Al-Bashir (SUNA)

Bashir reaffirmed on Saturday Sudan’s rejection to negotiate about a buffer zone on the common border with the South Sudan unless it is based on the map agreed by the two parties when the independence of the new state was declared.

Speaking before a meeting of the National Shura (consultation) Council of the ruling National Congress Party (NCP), Bashir said Sudan objected to the map prepared by the mediation team in a meeting of the African Union Peace and Security Council (PSC) held in November 2011, because it identifies an areas called ’14 miles’ located south of Bahr Al-Arab or Kiir River as a disputed area.

The president further underscored that despite this objection some African Union officials falsified the position and said that the government of Sudan had accepted this map.

"There are some conspirators at the Secretariat who hid this letter of Sudan’s objection from the chairman of the (African Union High Level) Panel, President (Thabo) Mbeki," he stressed.

He added that Sudan contested this map in a letter to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) underlining that the two parties previously agreed on four disputed areas and this fifth area was added by the African mediation without their consent.

"No talk and no negotiation on the security arrangements unless an agreement is reached on the line that separates the two countries in accordance with the borders of 1 January, 1956," he added.

Bashir announced this position after a statement by the mediation team saying South Sudan has accepted the map it had proposed to the two parties.

It also comes after an announcement by the South Sudanese President Salva Kiir Mayardit saying his country would seek international arbitration on the border disputed areas.

In a statement released this week, Jean Ping, chairman of the commission of the African Union, urged the two parties to enforce the peace and security roadmap reminding they are bound by the decisions of the PSC and by the UNSC acting under Chapter VII.

He also pointed out that the ’temporary security line’ does not aim to define final status of the boundary between the two countries but to cease hostilities.

Bashir emphasised that Sudan’s delegation will keep negotiating patiently until it gets all the rights for the country.

He also strongly denied any intention of making new concessions after those already made "for the sake of peace and unity" and which resulted in "treachery and treason", he said.

Bashir criticised the position of the international community saying it did not appreciate the efforts exerted by the Sudan for peace.

He further renewed Sudan’s commitment to UNSC resolution 2046, "even though it equates between the aggressor and the victim" and to settle the security arrangements before anything.

He pointed out that without resolving this issue there will be no peace, no oil transportation, no border monitoring, or four freedoms agreement.

On Thursday following a regular briefing to the UNSC on the situation between the two countries, South Sudanese ambassador to the United Nations (UN), Francis Nazario, told reporters that his country proposed to include all the contested areas in the buffer zone for greater security.

"Demilitarizing all disputed areas would enable the parties to begin final demarcation of the 2,000 kilometre long border in an atmosphere of greater security," he said.

South Sudan presented a map that adding six new sites to the existing four areas including, Heglig or Panthou, Magenes-Jida, Kafia Kingi, Hafra Nahas, Kaka Tijariya, and Monroe Strip.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 17 June 2012 06:40, by Madina Tonj

    UN and International Community body are wasting time supposedly, this guy must be brought to book. He had violated the International law many times, he had been indicted for what he did and refused to stand in the court and continues killing civilians in Darfur, Nuba and South Blue Nile .The solution for Omar al Bashir is to take action seriously that is the only key element the world need now.

    repondre message

    • 17 June 2012 08:07, by Dinka Dominated SPLA/M

      They don’t have brain, they still not realise that their missionaries are weaker to be used against the south anymore, and they are starting surrendered like their peer who does it during the well calculated CPA by Dr John Garang,
      Accusing Israel, America, and African, what left next is to accuse God in heaven for letting south shutdown their oil, what a shame to criminal Bashir,

      repondre message

    • 17 June 2012 10:11, by Johndumo14

      Omar Bashir said, there will be no peace, no oil transportation, no border monitoring, or four freedoms agreement.No talk and no negotiation on the security arrangements unless S.Sudan surrendered the occupied teritory to N.Sudan.Omar`s threats are not new,let him start the war,this time he wiil regret,SPLA are ready to defend S.Sudan`s border of 1st Jan.1956.This time no withdraw from all areas.

      repondre message

      • 17 June 2012 14:58, by Agutran

        Johndumo, did anyone in the South Sudan offer you any of those matters you listed? Look, you don’t say, I don’t want this and that, when someone you want those things from didn’t even offer you any!

        First of all, let South Sudan offer you any of the ones that you reference; and after that, you’ll sound reasonable to say no!

        repondre message

        • 17 June 2012 16:27, by Mi diit

          Bashir is not a peace-maker but was outwitted by strategic leaders who fooled him to have satisfied his interests only to be surprised with South Sudan getting independence. He accepted self-determination in 1997 thinking that he would divide the South forever based on new united Sudan vision and self-determination. He was pinned down on the self-determination for the first time but Dr. Riek

          repondre message

          • 17 June 2012 16:32, by Mi diit

            Machar rejoined with his late brother Dr. John Garang in January 2002, and in July 2002, they signed the first protocol of the CPA on self-determination in Machakos with Bashir. Again, Bashir thought that he would then fail the CPA and not implement it, but again the strategic leaders implemented the CPA during the six years under the watchful eyes of Bashir. The referendum was prioritized and

            repondre message

            • 17 June 2012 16:35, by Mi diit

              Bashir agreed for independence of South Sudan thinking that he was going to get away with our lands along the border. Now he understands that he was wrong. Outwitted again as a usual. If you think he is a peace maker ask him why he was shot in his leg by Dr. Riek Machar’s force in Mayom in 1980s before he became the president of Sudan. He should be careful next time for the next war will end him.

              repondre message

    • 17 June 2012 10:26, by Johndumo14

      President Omer Al-Bashir thinks he can win the disputed areas by gun.Omar Al bashir thinks his soldiers have supper guns,and SPLA have only sticks and stones. He is telling the sudanese army that SPLA have one gun 10 people.And he further said any sudan`s soldier die in this war will go to heaven,and each is given specal key made from china,that is a key to open heaven.

      repondre message

    • 17 June 2012 10:40, by Johndumo14

      Khartoum will be forced out of Abyei, Panthou, Kafia Kingi, Joda and Hafra Al Nahas sooner. There is no hope in The Hague for any arbitration, the same bodies will follow the case up there and foiled the wish of our people through their biased lens. We want our stolen land back.Khartoum will not budge or accept any deal on the territories they have occupied.

      repondre message

  • 17 June 2012 06:41, by Michael Angelo

    Mr. Bashir,

    Whether you like the new map or not is not our concern. Our concern is to get our stolen land back and that’s why we’re asking the AU & UN refer those contested areas to International arbitration court ASAP.

    repondre message

  • 17 June 2012 06:44, by George Bol

    Khartoum forced South Sudanese Southward during the decades of war but they fail to know that the areas they took where from the South.But this time,when the South call it a last word, we will be able to enter an capture the disputed areas and stay permanently. just a matter of time.

    repondre message

  • 17 June 2012 07:14, by Gatkuoth

    Previous Bashir said, security should be the first agenda in the talk where as South Sudan reject his insertion and proposed that border dermacation and the status of the disputed areas should the priority. Today he has contradicted himself by saying no security negotiation without border dermaction. This is an indication that this man is just buying time. Our galant forces must start liberating

    repondre message

  • 17 June 2012 07:29, by Wek Kawaja

    Al Bashit keep on complaining and accusing AU 4 what doesnt belong 2 u instead u surrender ur ass 2 the icc 4 what u did and stop anexting South land jz because it got oil then there will be no peace until ur beheaded or have ur head chopped off lol ur dead meat.

    repondre message

  • 17 June 2012 07:32, by Marolditapei

    GOOD NEWS FOR THE NORTH!!!
    Since South is building a new pipeline through Kenya or Ethiopia and Djibouti in the future, North Sudan pipeline is still valuable. North Sudan Pipeline can be used for transporting cow dungs since fertilizers are lacking in northern region. Good news!Right?

    repondre message

  • 17 June 2012 07:37, by George Bol

    Where will the North/Khartoum Arabs go when the SPLA start their operations northward? The liberation of the entire Sudan under bashier and hand it to Darfurians and SPLM-N is likely unless Basheir cooperate with the South in a peaceful way.

    repondre message

    • 17 June 2012 08:06, by Dinka Dominated SPLA/M

      They don’t have brain, they still not realise that their missionaries are weaker to be used against the south anymore, and they are starting surrendered like their peer who does it during the well calculated CPA by Dr John Garang,
      Accusing Israel, America, and African, what left next is to accuse God in heaven for letting south shutdown their oil, what a shame to criminal Bashir,

      repondre message

  • 17 June 2012 08:35, by Marolditapei

    COW DUNG TRANSPORTATION PROJECT!!!
    Since South is building a new pipeline through Kenya or Ethiopia and Djibouti in the future, North Sudan pipeline is still valuable. North Sudan Pipeline can be used for transporting cow dungs since fertilizers are lacking in northern region. Good news!Right?

    repondre message

  • 17 June 2012 08:57, by Pif Paf

    Dear Bashir,

    No matter how much you give up for peace spla will take it as a sign of weakness and try n take advantage of it. Tit for tat is the only strategy. Attack and claim upper nile state and raise the disputed area’s to 6. If they want higlieg then we want upper nile otherwise we go back to the 4 disputed areas we first agreed on.

    repondre message

    • 17 June 2012 13:17, by hellonearth

      YOU ARABS HAVE A MAJOR PROBLEM, YOU JUST DON’T LISTEN. YOU WANT US TO GO BACK TO WHAT WE DO BEST "FIGHT" BUT TRUST ME FAKE ARABS THIS TIME YOU WILL LOSE.
      SPLA OYEEE

      repondre message

    • 17 June 2012 13:40, by katnyokarieu

      pifpaf:
      u arabs re so nosiy stupid idiot who like war of word, u re acusing unsc who condemn s.sudan in ur favor, sons of shermosas, ur beshite omar will celebrate ramahadan al karim in the cementry grave yard this yr.

      repondre message

    • 17 June 2012 14:41, by zulu

      PitPat,
      Do you dare to do so? Were is the lousy mouth of SAF? Attempt any thing stupid and your NCP will pay for its final fallout. Competent soldiers need to advise your naive mind this time and agree with the 700 officers

      repondre message

    • 17 June 2012 15:30, by Chol

      Pif Paf, for historic territories of South Sudan, you don’t bargain for them as if you’re selling a bag of sugar! You don’t have to give up any, if you believe these territories are historically Sudanese regions.

      If you can be easily defeated intellectually with the historical facts and evidences, using force is not going to help you either!

      repondre message

  • 17 June 2012 13:13, by Observer

    Oh so now Bashir is blaming the AU. It was only a few weeks ago that he was insisting that South Sudan had to heed what the AU said. What has happened to his close relationship with Mbeki. Doesn;t get his own way and suddenly Mbeki and his team are now dishonest.

    repondre message

  • 17 June 2012 15:24, by never

    this is what happen when ICC took their eye off from dictators like president of sudan. Bashir is now talking taugh on the UN and AU.
    what is the next chapter for icc?

    repondre message

    • 17 June 2012 16:34, by Lok T Simon

      Dear Southerners,

      Elephant doesn’t tire of carries its tusk all long however heavy its tusk is.Southerners won’t be tired to taking back their land at the border. No anybody on earth gives up the land of his/her people to enemy because of peace. These intruders Arabs of Sudan will take this land at the boder when none of southern Sudaneses are present.
      Slavery and Egyptan occuption is over.

      repondre message

  • 17 June 2012 20:28, by Issawi

    To all southerns,
    any one who reads these articles will be shocked by the odd comments to any topic which shows that most of the writers are full of deep hostility to the Sudanese who helped them get their independence. Albisher is one of the bravest African leaders who took a sharp decision to let you free and save the North from your betrayal behavoir. But no use you will remain hostile people.

    repondre message

    • 17 June 2012 23:26, by sudani ana

      Issawi

      Like you am often shocked by the volume of hatred and hostility often exhibited by South Sudanese people who comment here. It’s mind boggling.

      repondre message

      • 18 June 2012 05:49, by Born-to-Rule

        Sudani Ana.

        May I remind you north Sudan has killed 2.5 millions southerns. This is not going to be easy to forget dude!, and that’s fact. There will be no peace in north Sudan and you better wise up. You people also killed almost a million Darfur citizens. Bashir is the world’s most wanted criminal dead or alive, and he will soon or later.

        repondre message

      • 18 June 2012 06:02, by Observer

        Sudani ana,

        I am surprised and shocked at the hatred and racism often shown by my fellow Sudanese on here.. people in glasshouses shouldn’t throw stones.

        repondre message

  • 18 June 2012 07:44, by Dinka-Defender-General

    Hello everyone, every area or location that was included in our map belong to us by any mean necessary or face us. Whether you agree or disagree. There’s no negotiation on these areas. Therefore, you should stop complain or just keep quiet. Here you have it.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


The better approach to reconciliation 2013-05-17 06:07:06 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 16, 2013 - Some of you who might have read my previous articles know that I promised some weeks ago to write separately on the topic of peace and reconciliation that (...)

OIL: is it a curse or a blessing in South Sudan? 2013-05-17 06:04:54 By Jacob K. Lupai May 16, 2013 - In the late 70s when for the first time oil was discovered in Southern Sudan there was euphoria that poverty would be a thing of the past, replaced by a high (...)

The misapprehension of peace in the context of conflict resolution 2013-05-16 11:40:39 By Ngor Arol Garang May 16, 2013 - Political leaders and citizens with an interest in politics within the Bahr el Ghazal region will come together for a one week conference on Wednesday, where (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.