Home | News    Tuesday 29 May 2012

Sudan & South Sudan resume talks today as Juba reports military assaults

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

May 28, 2012 (KHARTOUM) – South Sudan has accused Sudan of bombing its territories on the eve of their resumption of negotiations on post-referendum issues under the mediation of the African Union High Level Panel (AUHIP) in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa.

JPEG - 38.3 kb
FILE PHOTO - Pagan Amum (left), chief negotiator from South Sudan, lead mediator for the African Union, Thabo Mbeki (centre) and Sudan’s head negotiator Idriss Abdu Qadir , attend African Union-led talks between Sudan and South Sudan in Addis Ababa on March 13, 2012 (GETTY)

The negotiating teams of Sudan and South Sudan arrived in Addis Ababa on Monday to prepare for the start on Tuesday of their first round of talks since they floundered dangerously towards the beginning of April leading to the outbreak of the most serious fighting between the two neighbours since South Sudan gained independence last year.

Both countries have been given a three-month deadline by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and the African Union (AU) to conclude negotiations over citizenship, oil exports, demarcation of borders and the status of Abyei region.

The AUHIP led by former South African President Thabo Mbeki had already began preparing the agenda of the talks with the participation of three representatives from each side, Sudan Tribune was told.

Khartoum announced on Monday that it would immediately withdraw the Sudanese army (SAF) from Abyei which it occupied in May last year. SAF’s official spokesman said the move aims to send a sign of goodwill ahead of the start of the talks.

But Juba accused SAF of continuing military assaults inside South Sudanese territories. According to Philp Aguer, the official spokesperson of South Sudan’s army known as SPLA, the Sudanese army has for the last three days been bombing parts of Northern Bahr El Ghazal State. He also said that SAF used long-range artillery in the attacks.

South Sudan’s top negotiator, Pagan Amum, echoed the same allegations. “They are bombing South Sudan, attacking South Sudan, and continuing to send armed groups to destabilise South Sudan, these are not the signs of peace.” Amum, however, said he was still “optimistic” that the next round would go ahead.

In response, SAF’s spokesperson, Colonel Al-Sawarmi Khalid Sa’ad, denied South Sudan’s accusations. He challenged Juba to prove its allegations and asserted that SAF had nothing to do with what is happening inside South Sudan.

Meanwhile in Khartoum, the ministry of foreign affairs clarified that the government’s insistence on discussing security issues as a matter of priority was not “a precondition” to engage in talks.

The ministry’s spokesperson Al-Obaid Adam Marawih said that any agreement reached on citizenship, oil or borders would eventually be “worthless” if there is a flaring war and mutual distrust between the two countries.

“That’s why we say the security dossier should be the priority” he said. However, he was keen to point out that this position does not mean that Khartoum treats security as a “precondition” to the talks.

“We are prepared to look at other issues but we accord priority to the security dossier because, in our view, it is the right gateway to restoring trust between the two countries” Marawih concluded.

Also in Khartoum, Sudan’s president Omer Al-Bashir and first Vice-President Ali Osman Mohammed Taha held a meeting on Monday with the country’s negotiating delegation. Al-Bashir renewed his confidence in the delegation and gave it full authority to settle all agendas at the negotiation table.

The Sudanese delegation that left Khartoum to Addis Ababa is headed by Idris Mohammed Abdel Gadir and includes the following members: Mohammed Mukhtar, Said Al-Khatib, Mutrif Sidiq and Sabir Mohammed Al-Hassan as well as a cohort of technicians and experts from SAF and the National Intelligence and Security Services (NISS).

In a related development, the UN’s special envoy for Sudan and South Sudan, Haile Menkerios, urged the two sides in an interview with Radio Miraya to make “a strategic decision to resolve their differences through peaceful means” and “avoid mutual destruction.”

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 29 May 2012 09:24, by okucu pa lotinokwan

    I have no trust in Thabo Mbeki,the Chief mediator for AUHIP,see the way he look like.

    OKUCU PA LOTINOKWAN

    repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 09:44, by Dinkawarrior

      I have been telling you this man is a Money-mouth Mbeki, after Khartoum visited he came with security issues which President Leech Bashit told told him to carry on. I don’t trust him either, let’s wait and see what will come out there.

      repondre message

      • 29 May 2012 15:21, by Force 1

        Why is South Sudan going to Addis-Ababa when Sudan is not truly confirmed to have withdrawn from Abyei and Panthou as well? At the same time their territory is getting bombed! They don’t see what the headline says! “Sudan to begin the withdrawal today” that means they haven’t don’t a damn thing yet.

        repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 09:51, by Johndumo14

      THERE IS A SAYING!! Don`t test the deep water with 2 leggs!!
      Or you will not come out!!
      South sudan must not trust the AU,UN,EU,AND THE INTERNATIONAL COURT,ONLY TRUST YOURSELF AND THE ONLY THING POWER.If you are strong all will be your friends.Even if no agreement in the talks,no hurry for war,right now south sudan is pushed to the corner.Khartoum knows that Juba is surrounded,with many things

      repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 09:59, by Johndumo14

      Khartoum knows that,SPLA have no air power,now attack helcopters,no mig 29,no F 16,no income,no selling of oil,no morden tanks, no antiaircrafts missiles,no roads,no long artillary,no internatinal support,no airforce pilots.It will take long time before SPLA can be strong,that is why Omar is proud and sturbon.Khartoum wants to use this chance now,later too late,south sudan must play a smart game.!

      repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 10:02, by Ayom Dor

      I am highly pessimistic about these negotiations! Where two different parties r having their own different agendas without working on one humble ground for peace! Khartoum conflicts things most by bombings and urging millitias to attack the peace partner, South Sudan! We need God’s mercy for these countries!!!

      repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 10:07, by Zeki

      why the names for South Sudan delegation is appear and the names for the Sudan delegation appear.

      repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 11:05, by Nyamlelthii

      Dear all,

      I wish Pagan with his team a word of nationalist rather than coming back with fake agreements from that meeting,since the African Union High Level Panelis not on our side.

      repondre message

      • 29 May 2012 12:20, by simon yel

        what good do u hope mr. Amum to come with ? he is not worthy to go for negogiation at all. damn on him . how many time did he go there and what has he brought back ?.

        repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 11:46, by Lorolokin

      Mbeki can’t solve any problem B/N Juba and Khartoum coz those thugs in Kartoum knows how to bribe him. Alpha Umar Konarie was bribed by Khartoum,Salim Ahmed Salim was bribed by Khartoum so is Mbeki and his like Pong.
      The only hope for peace B/N Juba and Khartoum is Inter-governmwental Authority for Development (IGAD)to be given chance as suggested by South Sudan Information Minister.
      B.M. Benjami

      repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 12:14, by simon yel

      please stop politcal nomadism , and be a man of peace . please we are all seeing what president Bashir is doing to u , carrying bags loads with dollars inorder for u to do things in his favour . what have u implemented since u started the talk of two countries ? .

      repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 13:30, by wadelsudan

      we are only interested in security issues until that is resolved they will be no discussion in any other matters,until all north rebel leaders ejected from juba and spla break up with spla north,nothing will happen take it or leave it.

      repondre message

      • 29 May 2012 15:35, by zulu

        Wadel, what?
        You dummies. You keep repeating the same mistakes over and over expecting a different outcome each time. Heaven’t you learnt your lesson from the first mistake? The same tactic of disarming the SPLA from Blue Nile and Numba mountains seems to be in place here. You have not disarmed them since you launched the attacks againts them. What do you think will happen with south Sudan?

        repondre message

        • 29 May 2012 15:39, by zulu

          We have been there before on security and we play the cards you produce as an effective one. But you failed on all the occassions. We formed a JIU, but we still fought in Malakal and Abyei. We signed non agression pact, you ran out and launched an attack against us. We have become more disliking you than you us. Do not think we will jointly monitor the border with you. Never in a million years.

          repondre message

          • 29 May 2012 15:43, by zulu

            We will not disarm the SPLAN for you. You started fighting them, you have come into an agreement with them on that. Follow the CPA as signed in 2005 and honor it. Be truthful and Sudan will change and become peaceful. Redistribute wealth and power and equal basis. Remove corruption and corrupt leaders.

            repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 09:38, by Johndumo14

    This ngotiations will go nowhere,khartoum is a tricker,and south sudan has no trust in khartoum,because Omar is playing games,SPLA must first show khartoum militarily,right now khartoum believed that it can beat SPLA militarily. To make things easy,war first and peace follows,this sudan bombing shows that they can win south by force,but they are deceiving themselves.

    repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 09:47, by Gäär

    The UN security is so doomed. They like terrorists who lies and distort the truth.

    repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 10:02, by Dinka land

      Mbeki will not resolve any security issue between South and North Sudan since damn Bashir Backhanded him. Let us just prepare ourselves my fellow South Sudanese . Nothing will comes out helping us in this meeting led Thobi Mbeki.

      repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 10:00, by Equatoria one

    This is a step forward. We hope that this time round, Khartoum will come to the points.

    repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 10:32, by solider

    juba is trying to make the UN apply sanctions aganist khartoum by creating lies.where r your evidences ?

    repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 10:39, by Thorbanat

      Guys,
      Omer’s precondition of security first is not a bad thing because the term security in global context is ambiguous and broader. Actually South Sudan can tackle the issue of border demarcation under security theme. South Sudan can press the ownership of Panthou (Heglig) under security context, therefore, Beshir is very naive about what he demand.

      repondre message

      • 29 May 2012 10:47, by Thorbanat

        Mr. Solider or (Soldier),
        You are very antagonistic through your baseless argument. South Sudan is not trying to make UN Sanction Sudan. Actually UN and the USA will sanction Khartoum because of it terrorism tactics of negotiation deployed in Addis.

        repondre message

      • 29 May 2012 10:58, by Dinkawarrior

        Why Khartoum is lying to the world by saying we are committed to peace?
        While committed to crimes against civilians through air bombardment of our territories! Is it not a pure lie?
        I am real sorry for those 10 civilians may God Almighty raise their souls in peace!! I wish Banki Moon has good eyes to seee!!

        repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 11:16, by Samzil-Messiah 2

    Apparently In The Previous Meeting, It Was Your NCP Brainless Imbeciles Who Walked Out Of The Arbitration Chamber...Their Talks Were More Desultory And They Acted Like A Bunch Of Bitches...On The Other Hand The Harbinger Pagan’s Style Was Vicious And Ferocious...Next Jalaba Walking Out Of The Room Is Getting Kicked Straight In His Fucking Balls/Nuts.We Need A Panacea To All Your Evil Deeds

    repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 12:08, by Deng Chol Malual

    The expected talk outcome shoud base on CPA accomplishment especially grant to popular consultation for South Kordufan and South Blue Nile, Referandum for Abyei then South and North Sudan border demarcation.

    Thanks

    repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 12:57, by simon yel

    I have no hope of positive out come from talk because mr. Amum is not worthy to be there at all
    I don’t a ticket thet got him in negogiation because he a party secretary not south Sudan , and the agenda is for the nation . he must have to come back . damn on ,him.

    repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 23:01, by Dinka-Defender-General

      Simon, you don’t have to distrust Amum. He was in negogiation committe even when we didn’t get our independent. He has experiences to be there. He is our envoy at this moment. Anyway, are you simon yel Deng from which I know from Pinyido and K. Kenya?

      repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 13:44, by Tielkuoth

    Behind close door. South Africans in paricular Mr. Mediator’s party has a very good reason to dimiss him from the party.

    Sincerely, Nowhere on earth where a sucessful man could be removed without charges.

    One time one day u all will see the true colour of Mr. Chair

    By Ring of Lord

    repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 14:52, by Majak

      Amun, Atem Garang and Lino Worr Abyei an one of these people can achieve our goal as i know them.

      Our chief Mr Pan Amun is a man in the right place for this talk.

      I believ we will wine the case if you are ther Ustaz Amum.

      Your people are waiting you for celebration of our Border and other businese.

      SPLM Oyee.

      repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 17:03, by Northern Sudanese

    seriously, too much propaganda.........why would we bomb south sudan? whats the point?

    repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 18:36, by Northern Sudanese

    i just cant believe this.........where is ncp actually heading sudan? these people attacked our country. these people invaded Heglig for ten days. these people killed 258 SAF soldiers. these people are supporting the SRF. these people almost completely destroyed Heglig oil field. if not our genius engineers then we would have waited a year before production returns. why returning to talks?

    repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 18:44, by Northern Sudanese

      Dear MR.president Bashir

      reurning to talks with south sudan would create an incredible amount of opposition support from the sudanese general public. this would eventually lead to a collapse of the ncp.

      in addition, it would dramatically decrease the ncp’s popularity around the nation. Sudanese people would start to believe that all these 258 lives were lost for nothing.

      repondre message

    • 29 May 2012 21:06, by Stephen kuach

      Mr.Northern Sudanese!
      I think 258 is incorrect number for those mujahideen killed instantly in Heglig when the Spla captured it,the right number is 6000 SAF dead bodies.

      repondre message

      • 29 May 2012 21:20, by Northern Sudanese

        Stephen kuach

        where is the proof? it was 258 killed and 13 captured from SAF and 1,200 killed and several captured from SPLA

        you have no evidence that says 6,000 were killed......this number was made up by south sudanese on this website.......

        repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 21:23, by Northern Sudanese

    Stephen kuach

    however, 258 is still a large number...... i dont give a shit about those 1,200 SPLA killed in Heglig....but i lost 258 brothers in Heglig.....

    Bashir, where are you leading Sudan? during the last wars we lost nearly 18,000 soldiers........and after all, these men gave their lives for this nation but you still seperated it......this time we lost 258 and your still negotiating??????

    repondre message

    • 30 May 2012 01:59, by DeltaBravo

      You lost million Soldiers don’t try to reduce the number we know how many Saf die during the civil war. NCP didn’t even care how many SAF die. WE captured and sent them to Khartoum after peace agreement.

      repondre message

      • 30 May 2012 06:29, by Northern Sudanese

        DeltaBravo

        dont try to increase the number my friend.........we also captured a lot of spla soldiers but most were killed.........we lost 18,000 soldiers..........

        ’’You lost million Soldiers don’t try to reduce the number’’ Sudan never had an army of over a milion soldiers -.- ........... you make up to much propaganda XD

        repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 22:34, by Nguetbuny de Luelpiny

    SPLA is the liberation for African Land,not just South.
    AU,UN,EU are related to Arab Northern Setters. Shaigia are Albenian European brought by Turky during their Colony in Africa. Arab Prussian Invasion of Nuba Kingdom Egypt lead to whole taking North Africa. SPLA have a right to take whole North Africa if they have Power to do. Northern settlers knew where they come.

    liberators Nguetbuny

    repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 22:51, by Dinka-Defender-General

    Well, let’s see what will be after three months without progress. Do you think Sudan will stick to three months deadline? I don’t think so. They violate many promises already include the "CPA." Sudan leaders are money hungry. They will do everything to keep pumping our oil and buy weapons to kill our people. Anyway, when is the three months start? The time is clicking on them? What will happen tha

    repondre message

  • 29 May 2012 23:54, by Zionist

    Although, Omar Hassan Al Bashiir, is the most hated real Ja’alin Muslim head of State in South Sudan; however, Salva Kiir’s the most hated Dinka head of State in North Sudan. Neither Ja’alin nor Dinka will bring peace to our two natitions. Let go Abyei and Panthou, let go Kiir and Bashiir then we’ll have an everlasting peace. Sick and tired of playing dominant Dinka, and ignorant Nuer.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


National unity: a project for each and every South Sudanese 2013-05-21 14:23:01 By Jacob K. Lupai May 21, 2013 - South Sudan has just attained independence from an imposed unity that had failed miserably to take into account the objective realities on the ground. In the old (...)

Unity and reconciliation necessary for sustainable peace in Darfur 2013-05-21 14:19:47 By Adeeb Yousif May 20, 2013 -The biggest challenge in the Darfur conflict today is divisions. These divisions have created misunderstanding and mistrust within Darfurian society. Moreover they (...)

The Invasion of Abyei: two years of more agony 2013-05-20 05:39:13 By Luka Biong Deng May 19, 2013 - On 21st May 2013, the people of Abyei have spent two years of more agony and they will remember again the sad memories of how their lives and livelihoods were (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Sudan: Anatomy of a Conflict—New Report from Harvard Humanitarian Initiative 2013-05-22 00:46:46 Harvard Researchers Publish Satellite Imagery-Based History of Conflict in Sudan 2000+ Civilian Structures Appear Intentionally Destroyed; Humanitarian Agencies Targeted May 21, 2013 (...)

Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.