Home | News    Saturday 4 August 2012

Sudan, South Sudan reach deal over oil transportation fees - mediator

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

August 3, 2012 (KHARTOUM) — Sudan and South Sudan have reached a deal on oil transportation fees, the African Union chief mediator announced Friday in the Ethiopian capital where the two parties discuss a number of unresolved issues since the secession in July 2011.

JPEG - 35.8 kb
Chief mediator for Sudan-South Sudan talks, Thabo Mbeki (Getty)

"The parties have agreed on all of the financial arrangements regarding oil, so that’s done," Mbeki told reporters, following a meeting between the two delegations on Friday evening, but he did not provide further details.

"What will remain, given that there is an agreement, is to then discuss the next steps as to when the oil companies should be asked to prepare for resumption of production and export," he pointed out.

Sudanese delegation on Thursday released a position paper where it lowered its initial demand, $36, for oil transportation package to $22.20. However, Reuters reported that Khartoum negotiating team reduced it once again to $15 .

However, Ashorooq TV, a Sudanese private channel, reported that the two parties agreed on $25.80 per barrel.

The Sudanese government, which for long time refused to discuss other matters before to settle the security issue, warned that an agreement over oil fees cannot be signed before an agreement over the implementation of security arrangements.

However, Sudan wants the mediation to review a map proposed to enforce a buffer zone on the common border. Khartoum also accuses Juba of supporting to the Sudanese rebels but the latter keeps to deny increasing mistrust between the two parties.

UN Security Council will hold a meeting on 9 August to discuss the progress made in the process and to decide the way forward.

Nonetheless, Mbeki said the two parties have now to conclude a comprehensive agreement including security issue by 22 September.

During a brief visit to the South Sudanese capital, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Friday said it is in the interest of the two countries who are "intractably linked" to resume oil exportation as it is vital for their economy.

The two delegations were not reachable to comment after Mbeki’s statements.

The South African chief mediator further disclosed that Abyei issue should be discussed by presidents Omer Al-Bashir and Salva Kiir during a summit to be held next September.

"There’s an agreement between the parties that the matter of the final status of Abyei will be addressed at the next summit meeting of the presidents," he said.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 4 August 2012 07:27, by Anti-traitors!

    What? $ 25.80 per barrel. No, that’s not right!

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 07:34, by Anti-traitors!

      I don’t believes it at all. Why would Hon. Pagan Amum and his team accepted $ 25.80 per barrel anyway? If that’s correct, what are they going of this then?

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 07:47, by George Bol

        FYI, the oil deal was $ 15 per a barrel.

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 08:04, by Anti-traitors!

          Yours makes sense. Thanks.

          repondre message

          • 4 August 2012 08:35, by Dako

            It is a bad deal in whatever figure $15, $22.20 or $28.80

            repondre message

            • 4 August 2012 09:46, by Mading Makuac

              Which is correct figure actually(15%or28.80%)?

              repondre message

              • 4 August 2012 19:33, by Mi diit

                Very bad oil deal. We have been cheated a lot by Khartoum. Kiir should not have given in secretly. We have also set a bad precedence in dealing with Kenya and Djiboti oil pipelines.

                repondre message

        • 5 August 2012 07:32, by Chol

          South Sudanese negotiators over there at the conference; if you accept $ 36.00, $ 28.00, $ 9.00 or whatever the price is; and then the price dropped to $ 9.00 per barrel in the world market! What are you going to do? Sell it and handed all over as a transit fee to Sudan? Yes you can do that because that’s what you signed! --------

          repondre message

          • 5 August 2012 07:33, by Chol

            The solution is; make the deal with the percentage formula; this is where by when the price dropped in the stock market to $ 28.00 per barrel; then the transit fee would 10% of $ 28.00 which would be $ 2.80. If the price of a barrel is $ 200.00 in the stock market; then 10% of it would be $ 20.00 per barrel as a transit fee.

            repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 08:16, by Hardball

        Very funny; these numbers are all jokes; they are just playing with your minds. Do you guys remember when they say SPLA made the coup to overthrow President Kiir; was that true?

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 09:24, by Gabriel KK

          Yes Hardball, Hassan Turabi is again planning to get rid of Bashir through military means. He has a well organised fighters and he want people like ypu to join him and set Khartoum on fire. Funny!!

          repondre message

          • 4 August 2012 09:26, by Gabriel KK

            Sorry Harddball, I got confused.

            repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 08:57, by Dako

      I am waiting on this site for South Sudan citizens to express their anger with this bad oil deal. I will organise a huge demonstration in Juba, if it is true that there has been an agreement base on the stagering figures in this article.

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 10:45, by Deng Tut

        Mr. Dako
        well, well you are the enemey of the Repubilc of South Sudan State, first organise your huge demonstration in Juba at the time make sure that I’m going to arrest you and put you into prison for the term not excceesding 6 months or fine or both by committing an offence of Public Nuisance.

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 11:09, by Deng Tut

          your demonstration is a political motivation not in the interest of the people of South Sudan; our leaders are trying hardly to make a good deals with the North Sudan including borders issue while doing so, the objective is to build a refinery if not our economic is going to be menace.

          repondre message

          • 4 August 2012 11:29, by Gabriel KK

            Hi so called Deng Tut, please shut up from South Sudan affairs you traitor. you are an agent for Khartoum.

            repondre message

            • 4 August 2012 20:51, by Deng Tut

              My friend I doubt, I think you may be the one of Khartoum Regime Agent, I’m one of the hero of this Country. SPLA/M ayoo....., I was in the SPLA since or before the Movement was given that beautiful name SPLA in 1983. what I had cited above, to arrest Mr.Mako in any case if he organise demonstration against the Republic of South. sure

              repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 09:28, by omoni jr.

      sudan people liberation Army/movement.

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 12:42, by Jimmy A. Makur

        To Omoni jr.

        It’s Sudan’s people Liberation Army/Movement or perhaps you can add DC.

        We are waiting for really figures from S. Sudan side.It ’ll be $9 per barrel aleast that will be a good deal other than that is a joke.

        repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 20:44, by Baring

      Dear South Sudan Citizen.

      It is now another bad mistak we have taken with our open eyes at a day light. the oil deal that was agree on, is not for our inrerest at all but we have been force to take it. I have to ask all of you to wait till you read the whol agreement, if the deal of oil is $15, means no fanincal package to be given to Sudan and this dael has to be for three years

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 21:35, by Paul

        Sudan and USA made a secret deal. Sudan will provide all the intelligence exposing terrorists hide out in middle east and USA will persuade South Sudan to accept a favorable oil transit fee that will help Sudan Government from facing public sentiment. USA is the big devil and South Sudan should not look at USA as friends. USA only does something for its own interest.

        repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 07:29, by DANDHEL

    Told you that they gonna drop it to 25 dollars but if we wait now for the 24hrs they still gonna drop once again to 15 cents ...

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 07:41, by michael coma

      Can you imagine guys,this announcement is so confused.which one is correct from 36 to 15 and then to 22.80 per barrel?totally confused me.

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 08:19, by Tiger

        bad fuckin deal i ever seen,after all this waiting,we thought our negotiation teams would hold their ground and fight the political fight firmly.

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 08:58, by Anti-traitors!

          If it’s credible then it is better than 1997 deal. SPLM/A of Dr John Garang cannot and will never be fooled.

          repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 07:46, by Ayuiu Makuac Lam

    Thanks to both sides for massives understanding from what Clinton said as proverb saying this a percentage of something is better than percentage of nothing. I hope good working togather.

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 07:46, by George Bol

    $ 15 per a barrel but now the North spread news that oil accord was $ 28.50 a barrel. This is how they keep spreading lies. They will say latter that the agreement was for $ 28.50.
    Are we still give them financial assistance as well,?

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 17:14, by BM-21

      TO.Pagan Amum/SS Delegates.
      please you signed the agreement for 15% per barrel ,but not pick agreement ,it must be temporary agreement.

      repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 07:49, by michael coma

    Maybe guys,the deal has conbined government of South Sudan becoz no complain i heard from South side or they are dying silently.

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 07:52, by George Bol

    $ 15 a barrel is a done deal. Good but let keep Jallaba from the source of our oil because they devil who can seek for the revenge especially for Panthou lose. The North must stay away from selling and extraction of our oil. SPLA will be the one to guide the source. The North will just wait for their payment after South completed the selling of oil.Jallaba must return the oil they stole.Thanks

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 08:02, by Anti-traitors!

      Bol

      We need competent guys to runs it and shouldn’t be Kiir’s boys this time alone. But qualify South Sudanese who could make different. No to likes of Garang Diing Akuong coming back!

      repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 10:29, by Deng Tut

      the deal is far deal now both side must respect such a deals without problem, the North may not continuous looting our oil but let them return the stolen oil; 25.80 per barrel is find deals; always the North manipulated the situation in their favor.the border issue still complicated; the Bashir Regime demand 3 town out of 6 wherein the disputy frontier was base.bravo the teams of South Sudan

      repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 08:00, by Snipper

    If their demand of asking GOSS to disarm SPLM-N is not drop, then there is no an agreement! DEATH TO SONS OF OIL SEEKERS!

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 11:40, by Northern Sudanese

      Snipper

      SPLA has no choice , once they said no more than $1 or else the oil will stay underground, why are you now giving $25?

      now you may say you will not disarm spla north but after some time you will say ok we disarm them lol!

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 17:03, by South South

        Northern Sudanese,

        The deal is $ 9.48 per barrel, is that not sweet ? People who stop eating meat in Khartoum will start eating meat soon. It is $ 9.48 per barrel. Enjoy it Mr. laundry in the head.

        repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 08:12, by philipdit wol

    I doubt, This Mbeki will do nothing rather than giving two parties contradiction in his mediation. He should have known very well, that not every day is Sunday.

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 08:13, by Mayar

    Those two Sudan are so desperate, they need cash.. Just make sure use that cash for development and security not for war. Otherwise it will be useless deal. Bloody Oil!!!

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 08:15, by Dako

    If it is true that deal has been reached base on $15,$22.20 or $28.80, there is nothing for South Sudanese people to celebrate. Their government or negotiating team will come home empty handed. I thought it would be a win-win agreement but it has become a win and lose deal.

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 08:33, by George Bol

      1. Accommodating: Individuals who enjoy solving the other party’s problems and preserving personal relationships. Accommodators are sensitive to the emotional states, body language, and verbal signals of the other parties. They can, however, feel taken advantage of in situations when the other party places little emphasis on the relationship.
      2. Avoiding: Individuals who do not like to nego

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 08:33, by George Bol

        # Collaborating: Individuals who enjoy negotiations that involve solving tough problems in creative ways. Collaborators are good at using negotiations to understand the concerns and interests of the other parties. They can, however, create problems by transforming simple situations into more complex ones.
        # Competing: Individuals who enjoy negotiations because they present an opportunity to win so

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 08:35, by George Bol

          Compromising: Individuals who are eager to close the deal by doing what is fair and equal for all parties involved in the negotiation. Compromisers can be useful when there is limited time to complete the deal; however, compromisers often unnecessarily rush the negotiation process and make concessions too quickly. Mr Dako, there is nothing called win win negotiation,better consult some books. Thks

          repondre message

          • 4 August 2012 09:16, by Dako

            BOL. I did not say win-win negotiation as you put it. But what I posted earlier is more of a win-win outcome between the negotiating parties.

            Thanks

            repondre message

          • 4 August 2012 09:46, by Dako

            BOL, I know what I am talking about here. I am an Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR)graduate from Australia. The course I did involved all the negotiation processes. I will not consult a book but I will stick to whatever skill I have acquired throughout my career. If there is an agreement, it is an awful deal brother.
            Thanks

            repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 08:56, by Gabriel KK

    Compromising what, our oil???? this agreement is not fair at all. previous 7-9 is better. Stop negotiations on oil please because these criminals (NCP) can not be trusted any longer.

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 09:18, by wdalbalad1

    there are conflicting news about transit fees price as following
    25.8$ & 22$ & 15$
    I think it’s a good&fair a deal for any amount of them and it will be excellent it was 25.8$... but we hope sudan government not implememt this accord on the ground until to resolve all unresolved issue, security, demarcation border, stop backing rebellion.

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 09:36, by wdalbalad1

      jnopean
      why your government signed oil agreement and in the past they refused for this price and said last price is 8$.
      but you must know the truth this agreement is not made by your negotation team but made by Mrs.H Clinton and forced them to signed it and they obey the oreder of real leader for your country.
      H Clinton knew worsening situation in S S (economic collapse,unsecurity situation,famin

      repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 10:16, by solider

    WOOOOOOOOOOOW ,25 ???? even if it is 15$ that is a big win for the north.we all know it is supposed to be only 1$, but 15$ ???! hehehehe:) arab spring in sudan is OVER. THANK YOU MS. CLINTON. WE IN SUDAN LOVE YOU .GOD BLISS YOU

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 10:17, by Mel mosa

    Guys, I really disappointed of South Sudan government. Anything more than $1 means share of South Sudan oil with Sudan. So, the meaning of independence is useless. I am so sorry for my blood pouring during liberation and my brothers lose their lives and that all I can say.

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 10:41, by Sudan virus

    No problem for the time being!

    This will facilitate South Sudan’s establishment of her own pipe lines.

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 11:00, by solider

    gabrial. let us say it is 15$ per barrel.add to that the unknown amount of oil that will be looted in portsudan just like before, remember?? that deal is extreemly profitable for the north. it will kill the arab spring for sure.if you waited just another 1 month, the regime in khartoum would been changed for sure

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 12:33, by Gabriel KK

      Soldier, there will be no more looting this time around because every barrel paasing through your pipelines will be calculated properly and if anything suspicious is detected then that will be the end of it and you will go back to arab spring.

      repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 11:18, by Northern Sudanese

    hhahahahaa its $25 sudan tribune just made it up hahahahaha! Kiir said less than $1 why now $25 hahahahahahaa

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 11:20, by solider

    for the south this deal is nothing much.all the oil money will be looted as usual by mr. salva kiir and his boys .citizens of s.sudan have no value to him. in his view living in the jungle with peace is more than enough for the ordinary citizen of ss

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 11:36, by Northern Sudanese

    so we in sudan now control so mathematically , Sudan now gets 28.8 % of south sudans oil. hehehe, its Clinton whe secretely came to salva in his office and slapped him in the face and said ’’stop acting as if you have nothing to lose , your country is dead! and we don’t have money to save it, go and make a deal’’ hahahahaha

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 11:41, by Kurnyel

      Done deal hahahaha Kiir is under a high spot of hot water from soldiers and Garang thugs. yes they have sign 30$ a barrel full stop.

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 11:45, by Kurnyel

        Yes or No? La wala Nam? deal or no deal? the stupids people of South Sudan have ran out of cash, the black idoit people of S. Sudan their road came to an end. fuck you why did you wasted your time by shuting down oil? why did you killed your poor equips soldiers in Hiligic? you are cust to death, all evils wishes must kill Kiir and his vice president Machar.

        repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 11:48, by Northern Sudanese

    Thank you Mrs Clinton for giving us $25.80 for oil, i must say that i don’t hate you any longer. thanks for standing on our side (secretly)

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 12:32, by pabaak

    Absolutely is a bad deal in whatever figure around these numbers, why they don’t come out to tell exactly how much agreed upon? they have right to signed any deal because that’s definitely how bad governance on oils results.
    they have to signed any deal because the government didn’t expected that they are dealing with unpredictable partner in the North side of the border, and that’s why instead

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 12:40, by pabaak

      in first place well management of oil revenue to put basic services in place such as roads, schools, hospitals, and develop non-oil sector,the reverse was true, too much corruption which saw embezzlement of oils money to personal account in foreign countries. They have to signed any deal because government don’t listen to its citizen but to the foreign pressure and I believe this is what behind

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 12:49, by pabaak

        the deal, why worry so much about foreign pressure while the indicted government in Khartoum keep defying international rules and it seem even no foreign pressure has been matter to them? Ok if the deal signed what will prevent them again to steal our oil? this question have to be answered to masses of South Sudanese by our government before first tanker sail to international market.

        repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 15:32, by Loko El Pollo

        PABAAK,10 TO 15 A BARREL IS NOT THAT BAD FOR US.THE QUESTION IS HOW ARE WE GOING TO MANAGE AND UTILIZE THE LITTLE WE SHALL RECEIVE FROM THE SELL OF OIL.BROTHER MR KIIR IS IN TROUBLE.THE LEAKED NAMES OF THOSE WHO ARE NOW IN JAIL WERE THE ONE WHO PROTECTED HIM AND HIS SEAT FROM NUER TRAITORS.IF THE MONEY RUN OUT AT THE END OF SEPTEMBER,THESE NUER WHO PRETEND TO BE PATRIOTS WILL YANK HIM OUT OF

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 15:36, by Loko El Pollo

          OFFICE IN A SPLIT SECOND.DEPLOMAT DINKA DOMINATED SPLA MIGHT BE IN JAIL WITH HIS UNCLES.THAT WHY HE HAS NOT SHOWN UP ON THE WEB FOR THE LAST THREE DAYS.

          repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 13:23, by Northern Sudanese

    hahahahahaahaa you dumb southerners still believe in $15??? its reuters who said $15 but how did reuters know? do they have members in the negotiating rooms???? Reuters links to the word rumours!

    its Ashorooq who’s got the real news, its $25.80 p/b

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 15:14, by Observer

      N Sudanese.
      I am not a sumb southerner but an educated Sudanese and if Reuters aren;t to be beleived for not being in the negotiating room, why should we beleive our Khartoum papers , who also weren’t in the negotiating room.
      I know who I would beleive more - Reuters are a lot more honest and reliable

      repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 15:56, by Corrector

      Reuters actually said 22 + 3 billion USD in compensation.

      repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 13:53, by solider

    SALVA KIIR GOT A BITCH SLAP IN THE FACE BY MRS CLINTON .lol

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 14:15, by solider

    AL HILO , MALIK AGAR. LOOK HOW SOUTH SUDAN BETRAYED AND SOLD YOU IN SECONDS. WITH THE $25 OR $15 KHARTOUM REGIME WILL ERADICATE YOU BADLY. BY THE WAY THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THEY BETRAYED YOU.FIRST WHEN THEY SIGNED NIVASHA AND FORGOT ABOUT NUBA AND B.N. BELIVE ME U R NOTHING BUT SLAVES UNDER THEIR ASS.THEY GRAB U AND KICK YOU IN THE ASS ANYTIME THEY WANT.WHAT A HUMILIATION.

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 14:30, by Mapuor

      Soldier
      What do have to offer to the people of Nuba/Blue Nile besides peace which they need most,even those who were in the SPLA during the great war need dignified peace.There is no peace without war.Their destiny is theirs and the South is responsible for the destiny of its citizens,its upto Sudan to see what it will offer to Nuba/Blue Nile,international community is also watching you murderers

      repondre message

      • 4 August 2012 15:48, by Loko El Pollo

        MAPOUR,OUR SYSTEM IS REALLY BAD,AND THAT ALONE IS THE REASON DEVELOPMENTS WILL REMAIN THE WAY IT IS?IF YOU CAN’T FIND A JOB WITH A DEGREE AND THOSE WITH NOTHING ARE ROARING UP THERE,THEN THAT IS HOW ROTTEN THE COUNTRY IS.NO BIG MAN FROM YOUR CLAN AND YOU ARE AUTOMATICALLY OUT OF EMPLOYMENT.5 YRS FROM NOW AND WE WILL HAVE THE RICH CONTROLLING EVERY DECISIONS WITH MONEY.THAT IS THE KIND OF NATION WE

        repondre message

        • 4 August 2012 15:59, by Loko El Pollo

          FOUGHT AND DIED FOR.LOBBYING FOR SOMEONE ELSE JOB HAS BEEN ON THE RISE AND THE PRESIDENT IS QUIET ABOUT THIS EVIL WHICH WILL LEAD TO TRIBAL DIATRIBE,LOATH AND THE SUBSEQUENCE MELDOWN.

          repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 14:15, by Mapuor

    Brothers the rate at which some tribes practice corruption is alarming,just a glance at Chollo,when retired Gen Oyai was in charge of finance,he didnt hesitate to put his cousin in charge of finances of all SPLA divisions,a glance again at Bor not Twic east,Signal units was made in 2007 to be their preserve,a glance at Paweinj,haa Giir Chuang telecom preserve of Ataar Dinkas,let oil flow but

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 14:19, by E. Defense Forces

    They did it again!! SPLM sold South Sudan to foreigners.

    Watch Hillary Clinton in JUBA........... http://www.southsudanhub.com/media/1443/Sudan_and_South_Sudan_strike_oil_deal/

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 14:20, by 4Justice

    I told You!!!

    31 JULY 11:43, BY 4Justice

    The intention of her visit is to pressure Salva kiir to accept what the Islamists in Khartoum want.

    http://www.sudantribune.com/Clinton-to-visit-South-Sudan-this,43412

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 15:03, by Northern Sudanese

      4Justice

      4 the first time i agree with you, only 1 order and kiir implements it the next day :D

      repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 14:20, by Mapuor

    lets also try to eliminate corruption and nepotism,Salva is a very strong leader,if he were to practice corruption and nepotism at the rate of others,80% of cabinet would have been from Awan Chan,90% of SPLA Gens would have been from Awan Chan,we very well know you guys when the war was fought,you are the most corrupt beings on earth not Dinkas of great Bhr El Gazal

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 14:49, by Gordon

    Good news, indeed! At least for all those government officials who can now continue to fill up their private accounts.- Let us hope that there will remain a small share of the oil money for development!

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 15:10, by Pif Paf

    This is good news regardless of the fee’s.. This oil deal should help the spirt of the negotiations to reach a deal on security because a deal on oil is invaild with the absences of security. Weather SPLM seize support for the rebels or not will be the main factor in any deal.

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 15:47, by 4Justice

    Ladies and Gentlemen, the looting frenzy is about to recommence

    repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 18:48, by Abraham Majur Lam

    Which is which guys?.
    25.80,22 and 15 USD.
    it was recently when Khartoum lower to 22USD and our team refused and now 25.80 USD and our team accept this I can believe this. Pagan Amum will tells the truth soon.Let hope it is 15 USD and we shall construct our own pipeline in the due course.

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 19:30, by Northern Sudanese

      Abraham Majur Lam

      we lowered it to $32 from $36. now we lowered it to $25.80

      repondre message

      • 5 August 2012 01:02, by Observer

        Mutrif Sidiq, the official spokesman for Sudan’s delegation in the talks in Addis Ababa told The Associated Press from Khartoum, that there was an agreement on the transit fees for two different pipelines, one transporting crude for export and another that is light crude oil that goes through a refinery before going to the port. One fee agreed to was $9.48, and another was for about $11.

        repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 20:34, by Resonance

      The answer seems to be that the fees are $9.48 for one pipeline and $11 for another. There is also expected to be a $3.2 billion payment from South Sudan to Sudan.

      repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 19:21, by Kim Deng

    Folks,

    What do expect if a country is leaded by corupt and coward man? Of course, humiliation and defeat all the time.

    repondre message

    • 4 August 2012 20:42, by Thon Bai

      People, read the news on BBC agian before you Commented. the really price is $9.48, but not $15, $ 22, and $25.80 as some of you mentioned on this website. Don’t confused people here on the website.
      Thank you all.
      Thon Bai

      repondre message

  • 4 August 2012 20:40, by Resonance

    The fees are $9.48 and $11 (USD) per barrel. This is confirmed even by a Sudanese spokesman. There is also a $3.2 billion payment.

    repondre message

    • 5 August 2012 01:38, by Northern Sudanese

      Resonance

      that was the previous offer which we refused!

      repondre message

      • 5 August 2012 03:40, by Resonance

        This article explains the details:

        http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/sudan-south-sudan-strike-oil-exportation-deal-16929639

        The present deal definitely is based on $9.48 and $11 for two pipelines. The weighted average that would be paid is apparently below $10.

        Higher figures are based on including a one time payment over a certain timeframe.

        repondre message

        • 5 August 2012 03:46, by Resonance

          The alternative figures such as $15 cannot be the agreed fees, but might be some combination of the fees and the one time payment over a certain period of time.

          The figures of $9.48 and about $11 per barrel are not based on the earlier offer that (north) Sudan rejected.

          Mutrif Sidiq, according to the Associated Press, confirmed that an agreement was reached on two pipelines for these amount.

          repondre message

          • 5 August 2012 03:54, by Resonance

            The rejected deal was something like $7.26 and $9.10 per barrel of oil.

            repondre message

    • 6 August 2012 15:53, by Resonance

      Actually, the cash transfer is $3.02 billion.

      repondre message

  • 5 August 2012 01:53, by Observer

    N Sudanese

    Mutrif Sidiq, the official spokesman for Sudan’s delegation in the talks in Addis Ababa told The Associated Press from Khartoum, that there was an agreement on the transit fees for two different pipelines, one transporting crude for export and another that is light crude oil that goes through a refinery before going to the port. One fee agreed to was $9.48, and another was for about $1

    repondre message

    • 5 August 2012 04:08, by Observer

      That post should have read...one fee agreed to was $9.48, and another was for about $11

      repondre message

      • 5 August 2012 08:16, by Machajuong

        This oil peace deal was not only the one we expected to be reach but other issues those including Abyei protocols, and border demarcation.
        Thabo Mbeki and hillary clinton must be careful on this case, they don’t have right to force our people to sign the bad deal. What they know about South Sudan?
        If they know how many lives lost for this problem then they don’t need to rush!
        Mach-Ajuong

        repondre message

  • 6 August 2012 08:19, by wdalbalad1

    oooooohh all old and new comments not appear.
    what happen there is problem in the site or I have problem in my computer or... or... I don’t know.
    please tell us

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


The better approach to reconciliation 2013-05-17 06:07:06 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 16, 2013 - Some of you who might have read my previous articles know that I promised some weeks ago to write separately on the topic of peace and reconciliation that (...)

OIL: is it a curse or a blessing in South Sudan? 2013-05-17 06:04:54 By Jacob K. Lupai May 16, 2013 - In the late 70s when for the first time oil was discovered in Southern Sudan there was euphoria that poverty would be a thing of the past, replaced by a high (...)

The misapprehension of peace in the context of conflict resolution 2013-05-16 11:40:39 By Ngor Arol Garang May 16, 2013 - Political leaders and citizens with an interest in politics within the Bahr el Ghazal region will come together for a one week conference on Wednesday, where (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.