Home | News    Monday 30 July 2012

Stalled Sudans’ talks dash hopes of possible agreement before 2 August

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

July 29, 2012 (KHRTOUM) — Hopes ,even for a partial agreement over the outstanding issues, evaporated on Sunday when the Sudanese and South Sudanese negotiators failed to reach an agreement over oil fees.

South Sudan's Pagan Amum (left), chief mediator Thabo Mbeki (centre) and Sudan's Idriss Abdel Qadir , in Addis Ababa on March 13, 2012. The mediation and the international community were pushing the two sides to reach an agreement over two important issues: border security and oil, as there is great interest from both sides in these issues.

For the security issue the discussions are stalled over Sudan’s demand to withdraw "Mile 14" from the buffer zone. On the oil, Juba increased its offer on per barrel transportation fees to $9.16 and $7.20 for the two Sudanese pipelines, while Khartoum lowered its demand for $32, opening the door for more concessions.

The two negotiating teams over oil issues ended their meeting on Sunday in Addis Ababa without concluding an agreement over transportation fees. Khartoum actually says Juba should pay the fees in crude oil but Juba refuses.

Sudan says it wants a percentage of each barrel of oil transported and refuses the fixed amount of money, saying a percentage would take advantage of all future increases in oil prices but would also give it a sovereign right on exported oil in a way which avoids any delay in payments.

Juba rejects such demands, saying it is not known in international standards and accuses Khartoum of seeking to cover its budget deficit with oil fees.

Another meeting is expected to be held on Monday. As the head of Sudan’s lead negotiating team, Idris Mohamed Abdel-Gadir and its spokesperson Mutrfif Sidiq returned to Addis Ababa after talks in Khartoum.

Sudan’s foreign ministry spokesperson, El-Obeid Morawah, reaffirmed in Khartoum that the all the unresolved issues are now being discussed in Addis Ababa in order to reach a comprehensive deal with South Sudan, stressing that no agreement can be enforced before the security issue is resolved.

He further excluded international sanctions, as provided in the UN Security Council resolution 2046, if a comprehensive deal is not reached by the 2 August.

However, the international community was keen to keep the pressure on the two parties and did not exclude sanctions if no deal is sealed before the deadline fixed in the UN resolution.

UN officials stated that the parties should agree on the security matter if they want to get an extension of the three months’ delay.

The French foreign ministry also since Friday warned that the Security Council reserves the right to impose sanctions on both sides, "if no significant progress was observed by 2 August."

US ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, in a statement released on Saturday, called on the two parties to fulfil their obligations under the resolution 2046 before the end of the time limit.

"The US wishes to reiterate the UN Security Council’s decision — in the event that any or all of the parties have not complied with the decisions set forth in this resolution to take appropriate additional measures under Article 41 of the (UN) Charter as necessary," she further underscored in a statement published by the AFP.

Rice, who condemned the recent aerial bombardment carried out by the Sudanese army in the Bhar el-Ghazal region in South Sudan, also stressed on the need to stop providing support to rebel groups.

"At the same time, the United States reiterates the Security Council’s call to cease support to rebel groups" she said.

Chief mediator, Thabo Mbeki is expected to brief the UN Security Council on 9 August which should issue a decision on the talks in Addis Ababa.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 30 July 2012 07:26, by omoni jr.

    Never trust Jihadists of khartoum ,they only know how to steal and kill,

    repondre message

    • 30 July 2012 07:36, by Mach

      The talk has to fail because Khartoum is acting ridiculous! We know Khartoum is demanding $ 32.00 per barrel as a transit fee. They have to tell us first the price of a barrel of a crude oil when it’s sold in the stock market. Is it $ 40.00, $ 50.0 or $ 60.0 per barrel? -----

      repondre message

      • 30 July 2012 07:39, by Mach

        I believed it could be reasonable for them to tell us; here is the cost of a barrel in the stock market and we are charge you $ 32.00 per barrel and we can see if it make any sense.

        When it comes to the pipeline; the pipeline is legally South Sudanese pipeline, because it was built using South Sudanese oil and money. Khartoum should not act as if the pipeline is theirs!

        repondre message

        • 30 July 2012 08:34, by Hardball

          South Sudan needs to find a different route to Indian Ocean; because even if any lousy agreement is sign with Khartoum now; the stealing of oil will not stop; they can do it again the way they did it before.

          The border war is something that’s going to happen anytime; that means the production of oil will be disrupted no matter what. A route to Indian Ocean is very Important.

          repondre message

        • 30 July 2012 08:57, by salah

          if the pipeline belongs to South Sudan, then why are you negotiating with Sudan? Why don’t you use it as if it is yours. There was an agreement that you keep the oilfields and sudan keeps the pipelines. But like everything else yop want to re-negotiate everything after you got your independence and you come and blame Sudan for your problems.

          repondre message

      • 30 July 2012 08:08, by Logic

        Both governments are in bad positions, the oil flow is needed to maintain their governments. Khartoum’s government needs to keep a lid on a popular uprising once Ramadan is over.

        The problem is, the NCP is a criminal gang and are willing to commit suicide due to gangster-ish pride. The SRF is under supported, otherwise this gang would be history.

        repondre message

      • 30 July 2012 10:02, by Johndumo14

        The price of a crude oil per barrel is $79,45 in the international market. But this sudan`s oil pipe line was built with the stolen money from south sudan,why are they demanding $ 36,$32,even $20 is still very high price.
        God want us to be farmers ,not to live on oil,that is why the oil must be shut down.Anyway is a good thing.Because all people move to live in Juba,village life is best.

        repondre message

    • 30 July 2012 07:55, by Abikacha

      Mr. President and your generals(South Sudan) I want you to give me 24 hours to command your army and I will make sure our borders are demarcated and secured! Please don’t waste resources and time for nothing, period!

      repondre message

    • 30 July 2012 08:10, by mabuto

      I really agree with your statement Mr.Omoni JR beacuse those jihadists of Khartoum will never been trust due to thier lies. They know how to steal our oil at night, and they barking at us during day time when we ask them why you guys steal our oil at night? Omar bashir wants to steal our oil, but he do not wants to share it with us as a friendly.

      repondre message

  • 30 July 2012 07:57, by George Bol

    North want security first but they fail to full back for buffer zone. So what do they need?. North refuse the offer that is about $ 16 and demand $ 23 off international standard. so,what do they need?. They demand us to pay them with oil so that they steal like before.Let polish our spears. Thanks

    repondre message

  • 30 July 2012 08:02, by Whortti Bor Manza

    Khartoum knows Juba will run out of hard currency by Dec.as such She demands illogical and exorbitant price of $32 per barrel. i hope this time the brain of Pagan will open up and able to understand the trick. Let the team just pack and leave. this is a fruitless talk and a waste of time.

    repondre message

  • 30 July 2012 09:20, by Equatorian Boy

    Where ever they will reach with the agreement, Its should be in cash. Khartoum is looking at, 1- furture inflation in oil price in the world market. 2- There possibility of steeling as they are known thiefs. deeeeeemn!!!!!!!!!!!

    repondre message

    • 30 July 2012 09:50, by mubhah

      The Sudan is not inrested on oil fees like the South , for us security problems first must be settled. You want only money and leave the Sudan Suffer again because u are known for your betrayal of all the agreements signed with Bagan. We will never believe u as before. Securityyyyyyyyyyyy

      repondre message

  • 30 July 2012 10:54, by Michael Amane

    When you attach political crisis to price of a barrel of oil, then you are making no sense here. Sudan is in a big gap to cover, especially paying the corrupt officials who Bashir is scared will overthrow him. South Sudan is about to tell the world that we do not need Khartoum market to import goods but to export goods. Next year we do not need sugar or other food staffs from North. So drop oil!

    repondre message

    • 30 July 2012 13:00, by Northern Sudanese

      Michael Amane

      you export what? you can’t even feed halve your people???? when we closed trade and ended food smuggling to south people in unity starved to death!

      you asylum seekers can take it easy, you aren’t in trouble like those southerner in south sudan! south sudan is dead! sugar? so sugar is the only food in the world? do you even have it????

      repondre message

  • 30 July 2012 12:56, by Northern Sudanese

    when sanctions take place, south sudan will suffer faaaaar more than sudan because by august, dollars and foreign currency will be run out in the south!

    in addition to this,when they take place the south will have no money to built a pipe! a pipe will take 4-6 years as US officials claimed!

    its $32 , like it or not! if you don’t want it, your free to go we are interested in security nothing more

    repondre message

    • 30 July 2012 14:24, by Chol

      N. Sudanese, you don’t need to worry about security if you know you’re in your own land. You’re insecure because you’re in someone less land. As long as you occupy other people’s land; you’re damn right, you will be concerned about security!

      repondre message

      • 30 July 2012 16:12, by Northern Sudanese

        Chol

        listen, you insects don’t scare us but security is our top priority because it will cost lives. this land doesn’t belong to you and you will never be able to take it! instead of wasting your time telling fake stories lacking evidence i suggest you better shut your crap and think about your starving people!

        repondre message

        • 30 July 2012 16:31, by Tutbol

          N.sudan

          So fleeing malnourish refugees from SK and SBN have become S.sudanese? so you agree with this line; sudanese africans BAD, oil and land GOOD? mark my word, N. sudan is another balkan in the cooking! wait and see!

          repondre message

        • 30 July 2012 18:47, by zulu

          if secuirty is your concern then we have no clue what you want us to do. deal with it or face us at war and do bot run to arab leguem au or sc. this is plain simple for you suckers mosquito

          repondre message

    • 30 July 2012 17:40, by South South

      Northern Sudanese and Jalay

      Please stop lying to us. Sudan is suffering more than South Sudan now. Tell me how much is dollar rate today in Khartoum ? Other coward call Jalay needs to find something do rahter than pouring his lies out to us. Jerusalem is a Arab city, is it under Arab control now. Go and liberate it if you are men. By the way, South Sudan flag will be played in Jerusalem soon.

      repondre message

    • 30 July 2012 19:58, by Tiger

      Northern Sudanese!
      haha you are so desperate for our oil because we did not offer you what you have asked for,you sounded like an widowed lady crying for some food to feed her hungry children,anyway South Sudan will not suffer if that’s what your government is waiting for to hear,but you my friend shall be crying very soon because you have no good feritle land to produce your food/sandy,deserter

      repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


The better approach to reconciliation 2013-05-17 06:07:06 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 16, 2013 - Some of you who might have read my previous articles know that I promised some weeks ago to write separately on the topic of peace and reconciliation that (...)

OIL: is it a curse or a blessing in South Sudan? 2013-05-17 06:04:54 By Jacob K. Lupai May 16, 2013 - In the late 70s when for the first time oil was discovered in Southern Sudan there was euphoria that poverty would be a thing of the past, replaced by a high (...)

The misapprehension of peace in the context of conflict resolution 2013-05-16 11:40:39 By Ngor Arol Garang May 16, 2013 - Political leaders and citizens with an interest in politics within the Bahr el Ghazal region will come together for a one week conference on Wednesday, where (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.