Home | Comment & Analysis    Friday 15 June 2012

South Sudan & Sudan talks should discuss oil transit arrangement only

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By Isaiah Abraham

June 14, 2012 — South Sudan is negotiating with the Republic of the Sudan on post independence unresolved issues such as border demarcation - disputed areas, oil transit arrangement, Abyei status, citizenship and now security. The talks are sponsored by the African Union with the backing of the United Nations Security Council Resolution S/RES/2046 (2012) of May 2, 2012. Before then the two countries (Sudan and South Sudan) were on the verge of full scale war.

A southern land called Panthou in Western Upper Nile State, occupied illegally by Khartoum in 2008 was retaken by the Southern Army (the SPLA), and some powerful people and countries around the globe roundly (but unjustifiably) condemned South Sudan and asked it to immediately withdrawal its troop unconditionally. The President of South Sudan bowed, and Khartoum forces entered it. There is lull on the ground as things stand, an equilibrium moment generated by hope and only hope on the negotiation table in Ethiopia.

Ten days ago the two sides broke up talks because there was no head way or progress in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa. The two sides might resume their negotiations on the 19/6/2012, but analysts have already inauspiciously predicted gloom as one side is bent to frustrate the entire efforts through its intransigence and blackmailing.

Border Demarcation impasse, security and violations

The United Nations Resolution or African Union High-Level Implementation Panel (AUHIP) roadmap would have helped, alas, its tight schedules and lack of clear methodology to monitor violations makes it an exploitable and weak project that failed to deliver. There is also that element of politicking by key Security Council Members, a scenario that is used perfectly by Khartoum to ignore resolutions issued by the same.

Otherwise, the roadmap by (AUIP) was cyst ally clear as it called for immediate cessation of hostilities, including aerial bombardment, unconditional withdrawal of protagonists forces to their respective known borders, stop harboring of each side dissidents, scale down of propaganda against one another, and resumption of unconditional talks between the two countries.

Khartoum never accepted any of the above cited resolutions, as it continuous to bomb and rain fire unto the territories of the Republic of South Sudan (until last week). They are still in areas deeply inside the territory of the Republic of South Sudan, they are much on the sabotage mission to destabilize the government of the people of South Sudan, they are, they are…

The question that poses itself is that when will Juba stop becoming impressionable before the guile of the so-called International Community? The UN is a terrible body that is badly structured, and will continue to be selective and discriminative as ever. On the ground, they have caused us problem due to the map they have crafted without any authorization from the authority. Khartoum and the outside world are misled to believe that the territories in disputes are for the Northern Sudan. UN did it. I see them (UN field staff) consume too much money, without protecting peace or people. Abyei massacre by marauding Misseriya in 2008 was a case in point. It was before the watchful eyes of the UN.

UN is biased

The UN and the African Union owe our people answers, when they deceive us to withdraw from Panthou, and allowed our people to be killed thereafter. After UN resolution 2046, Khartoum shouldn’t have been allowed to bomb and shell innocent civilians in the republic of South Sudan. To offer lip service and empty threats without an action is too bad indeed. South Sudan must be protected from this rogue country called the Sudan. If UN or the AU can’t do, we can protect ourselves and our territories. Sudan doesn’t care about anything and the UN shouldn’t make mistake again to interfere with facts regarding South Sudan or the Sudan. They have for long ignored our cry for help from powerful and elder brother called the Sudan.

Time has come for our people to stand up and defend their land. Governors are doing excellent job in that regards; our army under Gen. Mamur, Gen. Oath, Gen. Dr. Majak and the group will not disappoint! Khartoum will be forced out of Abyei, Panthou, Kafia Kingi, Joda and Hafra Al Nahas sooner. There is no hope in The Hague for any arbitration, the same bodies will follow the case up there and foiled the wish of our people through their biased lens. We want our stolen lands back, not an inch give to the North! Sudan doesn’t want us to live and enjoy peace.

Please discuss oil transit deal only

Khartoum will not budge or accept any deal on the territories they have occupied. They thought since the international community is with them and are firmly on the ground, there is no hurry to discuss such matters. So if that is the case, the South shouldn’t waste time talking about territories stolen. Nothing is coming out there. Our men will do it on the ground one day! The only agenda in the next round of talks should be about oil transit arrangement.

The two countries economies are in real trouble and both sides are ready to compromise. As Africans we have an obligation to help our brothers in the Sudan with our ‘food’. We must share with the Sudanese on a reasonable agreement not the exorbitant and wild charges of over $30 a barrel. No one will go for a loss like that. Time line is also needed (2 years is enough) and more robust control mechanism, internationally supervised. A deal is possible there.

Isaiah Abraham lives in Juba; Isaiah_abraham@yahoo.co.uk



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 15 June 2012 16:48, by Ambago

    Dear Isaiah!

    Sky and earth can meet, but none of our Oil will ever be transported through Port Sudan. It’s either dependence or Independence!

    Dr. JAC Ramba.

    repondre message

    • 15 June 2012 17:43, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

      One wonders what this guy is trying to portray! How can you talk about the recovery of our land from the imperialists by own means and on the other hand you beg to pass our oil through their land? Enemies do not share plates together! Only when Jallaba can act logically, then the people can talk about bilateral relationship on anything.

      repondre message

    • 16 June 2012 11:03, by mohammed ali

      Ambago, sky & earth can never meet, you have to be very sure about that. I can assure you 1000000% that no oil from SS will pass through our land even if you pay $ 100. Meanwhile SS can only survive if the thieves repatriated the stolen money & pple like you return home as we the jalaba have trained them to help their pple.Come back home you have the highest maternal mortality rate in the world!

      repondre message

      • 18 June 2012 06:51, by zulu

        Ambago nd Mohamed.
        Both of you made important points. For Isaiah to suggest we negotiate on oil transit fee, is luducrus and silly. Mohamed, you made a very good point because it is very silly too. We wont see oil flow north ever again, may be when the regime is changed as we see demonstrations happening now in the North. Beshit is changing as well on security and border. see how stupid these are

        repondre message

  • 16 June 2012 02:53, by George Bol

    It’s a matter of time for SAF to be force out in the disputed areas. I think the oil transit discussion should be stop because it’s fruitless.Let measure the cost of resumption of labor cost, facilities cost plus the millions that Khartoum will steal if we resume the oil to Sudan. Our oil must remain static. But South must be in a maximum alert every single day and night. Let have anti-aircraft.

    repondre message

    • 16 June 2012 06:38, by katnyokarieu

      bro Abraham u put opinion as it,but mindn,t u south sudan will not believe by the international community dispite of thier over disputed areas,the reason are as follows: 1-ss is beiing represented by islamic (law sharia law) escape boys like pagan who knwen nothing about those disputed areas by then and upto now.this is where world stood firm with sudan,becozs we ss are confused where put con....

      repondre message

      • 16 June 2012 06:50, by katnyokarieu

        areas,2- from the beginning we mind about oil but not territories in heglig,then our bro in Abyei get in vigrously minding for percent they will be give,then south sudan misplace the area due to thier influnce,aftre hague ruling they vowed that it is not thier area after lossing the court than place it again to unity state and not the right community ownship as the expert and sudan colonial geopis

        repondre message

        • 16 June 2012 07:00, by katnyokarieu

          this qualify ss negiating team lairs before the international community,3-pagan himself have being known by the world for aggressor toward sudan,here the international community see his word as false and lam excuses at the table, for south sudan to be recognise by the international community the current situation the following people should ..

          repondre message

          • 16 June 2012 07:09, by katnyokarieu

            lead the ss to negiatiating table in Adiss Ababa.1-mose Machar Arop chief negaitiator.2Aldo Ajou Deng Akuei 3 uncle Gajang Awou 4 Atem Garang spoke person in the take.we will have our right in the hand of those mzee, recognise by international community.but with the gangs of SPLM,we will face suction beleive me guys .mr kat a man far corruption and misess of SPLM.

            repondre message

            • 16 June 2012 08:05, by George Bol

              My friend, you need to stop supporting Jallaba. I am very sure you are indeed a south Sudanese but your weak heart.
              You are hurting yourself with lies. Where will you take SPLM/A in the South? Better keep quit my dear.

              repondre message

              • 16 June 2012 08:19, by katnyokarieu

                George Bol ,in comment where have supportde Arabs or u have problem of understand. and if u re a die after SPLM,make ss under ur step salva kiir with his sole advisor have led the country in misess. Look how he is begging the thieves as he is not guided by the law,that stated a corrupt officer have to be proscuted. SPLM was form by citizens of south sudan to topple islamis,the same senario,,,,

                repondre message

                • 16 June 2012 08:25, by katnyokarieu

                  they have to topple the corrupt regime SPLM gangs,and mindn,t they will go shamefully whn ss vote them out confindently.

                  repondre message

            • 16 June 2012 08:27, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

              You are lying to yourself if you are a South Sudanese. Aldo Ajou will definitely hand over South Sudan on a diamond plate if they are given a mandate to represent the then down-trodden people. As a commissioner of Bahr el ghazal Ajou was tested. He did not help Malual Gerinyang at the time of famine. He misinformed the world about it and human right violations by Jallaba then.

              repondre message

              • 16 June 2012 09:30, by katnyokarieu

                jur-likang-jur-likang, time differed Aldo the time he was commissioner ,he was oppress islamis who don,t revial the truth,but he is free and giuded by the consititution,though SPLM is oppresing the international community recognise as he will be taking out of expereince,and documentation bro lt said the truth and truth will free us in this moment.

                repondre message

    • 16 June 2012 19:29, by mohammed ali

      Bol, according to your president it the SPLA ganesters who are stealng your money , not Khartoum. He ordered 75 thieves to retutrn the stolen money. You leaders are the thieves, according to your president!.

      repondre message

      • 17 June 2012 03:11, by Michael Angelo

        Mohammed,

        There are more corruption in the north than South. If you dispute that claim then try to get access to those of Ali Nafie bank accounts and you will see by yourself. Yes, there is corruption in the South and neither do northerners as well.

        repondre message

  • 17 June 2012 20:58, by Issawi

    Mr. Isiabu
    If you ,as a southern Sudan intellectual, are crying from the UN/ UNSC/African Great Unity , which all stood onyour side , you are complaining from , what can a Sudan govrnment say? This shows that you want the UNSC to embrace you and let you do as you like. You have tried to test the UNSC by invading Heglig but the whole world reacted innocently against you which lead to your smash.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


The Invasion of Abyei: two years of more agony 2013-05-20 05:39:13 By Luka Biong Deng May 19, 2013 - On 21st May 2013, the people of Abyei have spent two years of more agony and they will remember again the sad memories of how their lives and livelihoods were (...)

The better approach to reconciliation 2013-05-17 06:07:06 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 16, 2013 - Some of you who might have read my previous articles know that I promised some weeks ago to write separately on the topic of peace and reconciliation that (...)

OIL: is it a curse or a blessing in South Sudan? 2013-05-17 06:04:54 By Jacob K. Lupai May 16, 2013 - In the late 70s when for the first time oil was discovered in Southern Sudan there was euphoria that poverty would be a thing of the past, replaced by a high (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.