Home page | News    Friday 27 January 2012

North and South Sudan reviewing latest proposal by AUHIP on oil dispute

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

January 26, 2012 (KHARTOUM) – The African High Level Implementation Panel (AUHIP) mediation team tabled new proposals for the negotiating teams from Khartoum and Juba in a new bid to break the long standing deadlock over the issue of oil transit fees.

JPEG - 31.1 kb
Saber Mohamed al-Hassan Khartoum’s chief negotiator on economic issues (AFP)

The landlocked South Sudan is using the north’s infrastructure including pipelines and refineries to export its oil but it is in disagreement with its northern neighbour over how much it should be charged for using this service.

Khartoum is insisting on no less than $32 per barrel of oil which Juba vehemently rejects calling it excessive compared to international norms.

On Tuesday AUHIP suggested a temporary arrangement that lasts for a month and a permanent one by which South Sudan pays a specific amount of money that covers the period from 9 July 2011 until December 2014.

The head of the economic committee within Sudan’s delegation Saber Mohamed al-Hassan spoke favourably of the new AUHIP initiative saying it is better than the previous ones but refused to release its exact details.

Al-Hassan flew to Khartoum for consultations with officials there and is expected to return to Addis Ababa on Friday to rejoin the negotiations.

The Sudanese foreign ministry spokesperson Al-Obeid Marwih told reporters that he expects the responses to the new proposals to be submitted today on its temporary and permanent portions.

The president of Sudan Omer Hassan al-Bashir is expected to hold a summit in Addis Ababa on Friday with his southern counterpart Salva Kiir along with Ethiopian prime minister Meles Zenawi and Kenyan president Mwai Kibaki.

Marwih said that it is likely that the summit will result in an agreement being signed before the end of this negotiation round on Saturday.

Tensions between Khartoum and Juba escalated further after Juba decided last week to suspend oil production in retaliation for what it said was stealing by Sudan of its crude oil passing through pipelines on its territories to export terminals in the Red Sea.

Khartoum defended its decision to confiscate South Sudan’s oil, saying Juba has failed to pay transit fees since the south seceded from Sudan in July of last year. Sudanese officials say the arrears amount to almost $1 billion.

In a related issue the Sudanese oil ministry denied assertions made by some analysts that the halting of oil production by South Sudan will damage the pipelines due to its heavy nature.

The Director of the general administration of oil supply and marketing of Azhari Baspar told the government-sponsored Sudanese Media Centre website that Sudan does not rely for its oil derivatives from oil produced in South Sudan. He noted that the refineries in and Khartoum and al-Obaid depend on the Nile Blend light crude.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 27 January 07:58, by Daniel Deng

    It’s waste of time, I think pres. Kiir should have been wiser not to attend the meeting. We need to teach northerners a lesson they won’t forget, no penny from south sudan oil for a year. Please stick to your gun Mr.president.

    Reply to this message

    • 27 January 09:44, by sami

      i totally agree with you, it’s time for both teams to go back home. the mistrust between the two former brothers is bigger than to be resolved.

      Reply to this message

      • 27 January 09:45, by sami

        oil production had only started a few years ago, and we have been doing ok without it for quite a long time, actually we have been fighting in three different fronts and under so heavy sanctions without one drop of oil at that time. don’t worry abut us my former brother, hope i can say the same thing about you though !!

        Reply to this message

      • 27 January 13:06, by Lang

        GoSS must reject any proposal coming from the corrupt AU and terrorist government in khartoum.
        "Sudan sells seized S. Sudan crude at deep discount" -Reuters 1/27/2012

        Reply to this message

        • 27 January 13:08, by Lang

          AU want us to continue shipping oil through the north because they want to allow the terrorist to steal more oil.

          Reply to this message

        • 27 January 13:11, by Lang

          Where is the AU to condemn the stolen oil being sold? No where as usual. They are pro-north and have teamed up with them while the north is arm twisting they are only their to push us to agree to what they north wants. That is all.

          Reply to this message

    • 27 January 11:48, by Lual Garang De Lual

      To: My president Salva Kiir Mayardit

      Khartoum is under pressure, the pressure you applied is more then they expected, dear President if you are going to talk, here are some of the conditions that should be on the table and in your playing card of bargaining.
      1. Khartoum should remove the tied in pipe that was constructed recently to sippen off our oil resources

      Reply to this message

      • 27 January 12:00, by Lual Garang De Lual

        2.Khartoum should sign a comprehensive agreement on transit fee not more than $1
        3. All other issues such as Abyei, border demarcation and South Sudanese in the North should also be discussed in good faith as well before inking the oil issue. Khartoum is now under pressure from all sides including it long time allies such as China, Russia, Malaysia and Indonesia.

        Reply to this message

        • 27 January 13:30, by John Bang

          Mr. Lual,
          You are correct on that idea,our government could not be decieved on signing agreement with Khartoum again.Let South Sudan have contract with other East African for the building of pipeline construction. This thing will happen one day and it ’ll be difficult for construction of pipeline while we ’re expecting war with Arabs.

          Reply to this message

          • 27 January 16:19, by Ruach

            No need to talk to Bashir in Khartoum.They ’ve magic they will neutralize our President to soft enough!Bashir is Minister in the hell that will be appointed by Bin laden the president for the dead communities in the hell.Hell to Bashir who killed millions of Africans because of oil.He was instructed by his religions to kill Africans! Uh what a religion!

            Reply to this message

      • 27 January 12:35, by Force 1

        South Sudan Authorities have the option not to attend the meeting, negotiation call it whatever you want. Northerners were the ones mocking South Sudan that they will suffer if they don’t shipped their oil through north Sudan?
        Now who are the ones kicking and screaming?! The power is now shifted from north to South Sudan; Southerners should now lay back and groom their beard.

        Reply to this message

    • 27 January 12:30, by okucu pa lotinokwan

      The AUHIP, where were you when the Khartoum are stealing our Oil,the proposal you want to come with is un acceptable, you the AUHIP we know you are pro Khartoum Salva Kiir should not accept nonesense again the Oil Pipeline should remain shut as all the southerners Sudanses has agree on.No reverse.

      OKUCU PA LOTINOKWAN

      Reply to this message

    • 27 January 20:25, by panom lualbil

      I beleived folks who insist on taking arm against now didnt know why Anyanya and SPLA/M took arm b4. First, think about press, Religion,liberty, pursue of happiness but not money or oil. Also remember how long it took anyana/spla to acheive? reasons are: some tribes wont fight while other do. still others are obsorbed by arab to sabotage us. no infliction weapons. so how u gona win! Thankyou Jesus

      Reply to this message

  • 27 January 08:08, by akid malual

    These is propaganda issue of make south to came back to the table.
    Stupid idea from Khartoum

    Reply to this message

  • 27 January 08:29, by Both Ruach Pur

    Khartoum Government realize that without oil from South, the life will be worst that is why they want negotiation again but President, don’t allow that because when you say yes to have negotiation they will steal our oil automatically.
    Let them learn the lesson and don’t give up your decision.

    Reply to this message

  • 27 January 08:46, by John

    Any one opposed the proposal can bring us any economic solution other than just laughing at the North?

    How you gonna bring food to the table without income? 100% rely on international communities? Are they able to provide billions to feed everyone?

    I don’t think so, look what happened in Somali and you will understand.

    Reply to this message

    • 27 January 09:14, by SeekingTruth

      JOHN, THE PROBLEM WITH PEOPLE LIKE YOURSELF IS THAT THEY DON’T KNOW THE DIFFERENT BETWEEN SHORT RUN AND LONG RUN ECONOMICS IMPACT. YES, PEOPLE MAY SUFFER IN THE SHORT RUN IF THE OIL PRODUCTION IS SHUT DOWN BUT THAT WILL ALSO MEAN AN ECONOMICS STABILITY IN THE LONG RUN. ALSO, SOMALIA EXAMPLE IS TERRIBLE! SOMALIA HAS NOTHING BUT SOUTH GOT RESOURCES THAT WILL NOT REMAINED UNDERGROUND FOREVER.

      Reply to this message

      • 27 January 09:24, by Dinka Dominated SPLA/M

        JOHN, THE PROBLEM WITH PEOPLE LIKE YOURSELF IS THAT THEY always after food living their right for just food,

        What is wrong with you people? is everthings you love is food?

        JOHN you must have a right to eat food but you don’t eat food because it is your right,

        death to you back stabber food lover,

        Reply to this message

        • 27 January 13:29, by ABDALLA BIN ABDALLA

          Dear Dinka D SPLM

          There is no food in today’s headline. Where did you get food lovers in this article? Nothing was mentioned about food in this article.

          I think you are glutonous person. You are the most food lover because you talk of food in non food article.

          This article is about a review of proposal made by AUHIP on how to tackle oil crisis in sudan. Next time don’t go out of topic.

          Reply to this message

    • 28 January 06:13, by john agoet

      Haha..... Wards are enough to illustrate your identity. You are not a Southerner, you try very hard to cover but don’t work, feelings are hard to veil... brother. Get off the site or come as a Northerner and we can contest our thought openly. that why we are here. To answer your question; we have a surplus to cover our bills for five years by than we will be able to reexmporting our oil over again

      Reply to this message

    • 28 January 06:20, by john agoet

      To JOHN Haha..... Wards are enough to illustrate your identity. You are not a Southerner, you try very hard to cover but don’t work, feelings are hard to veil... brother. Get off the site or come as a Northerner and we can contest our thought openly. that why we are here. To answer your question; we have a surplus to cover our bills for five years by than we will be able to reexmporting over again

      Reply to this message

  • 27 January 09:05, by mosa mel

    Guys your comments make sense. The South Sudan already lock up oil pipeline. It is too late for Khartoum to run up and down with failure AUHIP. No more compromise. AUHIP failure didn’t tell Khartoum the right international payment for pipeline and keeping bring fake proposal because they have been paying by Khartoum government. right payment for pipeline in world is less than $1.

    Reply to this message

    • 27 January 09:17, by Tamongali

      Mr. Musa, three days go, i have commented here that USA for the support of the proposal and whole western world are also supporting the proposal.Can any of the two countries resist to come back to table? USA is every thing.So all our ideas and thought will just vanish in the air.

      Reply to this message

      • 27 January 09:53, by rock

        To Tamongali
        oil is belong to south Sudan and no one can open it by force.
        western world you mention they are there to avoid the blame if South Sudan refuse to open oil production, and it has nothing do with pushing south Sudan government to agreement that can`t benefit her people at the end.

        Reply to this message

        • 27 January 10:06, by Tamongali

          Rock, you are right. But western world and USA are the one controlling the world pules.good examples are Iran and others.that made me to believe that they are every thing and can do what they like.

          Reply to this message

          • 27 January 19:41, by mosa mel

            Tamongali
            Politics something funny sometimes. The western countries and USA try to test how South Sudan government stand strong for it decision and how South govt control it resources. Western countries and US know very well how Khartoum govt has been fool South people for long time. So they just say it as to support but they are not.

            Reply to this message

  • 27 January 09:46, by Ambago

    Dear President Kiir

    Please stand your ground. RSS is now an independent sovereignty and we have broken ranks with these Islamists and the so-called Arabs.

    Today is the Day. Yes to the "East African Community". No to the “Arab League”. No to any compromise with the “Arab North”. No to Oil through "Port Sudan". Do this and history will respect you! Otherwise……..

    Reply to this message

  • 27 January 10:14, by rock

    AUHIP proposals as they called it, is in favor of Sudan because AUHIP need Sudan to steal more oil from south Sudan.
    my message to south Sudan delegate is that, don`t accept one month agreement but permanent one with clear details that are acceptable according to international norm. otherwise inform AUHIP team to stop negotiation on oil issue and come back Home.

    Reply to this message

  • 27 January 10:29, by akid malual

    WOW. Khartoum cry out of South Closing pipeline More than for the South Sudan independent break away. Because oil was only the life of Muslim North Betray Southern in the country and black people in Sudan. Khartoum was ever have a little hope want oil go through port Sudan by, was steal it part. But not now south acknowledge oil been steal by the south these day, the was steal even want oil

    Reply to this message

  • 27 January 10:42, by ABDALLA BIN ABDALLA

    Wow

    The North Knew that South is completely going away from sudan. So they want them back and further exploit them.

    Mr.kiir and his fellow comrades must use this golden oportunity to negotiate a fair deal that will be beneficial to both countries.

    Dear southerners, stand fully with your leaders and support their decision that is beneficial to you. Mr.Kiir is not capable enough to make a good

    Reply to this message

  • 27 January 12:49, by Anynya One

    If President Kirr wants to save his period in the office with less problems, he must stop reconnecting with Khartoum for now. It is not wise because Khartoum Gov. is a clear ENEMY!!! #1. South Sudan connects with "East African Community" is a BIG YES! and please... No to the “Arab League”.Bye Bye

    Reply to this message

  • 27 January 15:25, by Padiet Deng Alony

    I never heard AUHIP condemning the north sudan for stealing the South Sudan oil while they were negotiating the transit fees charge.i never heard international community telling north that the international standard for transit fees through pipelines is this instead of 32 dollar by north.

    no more going back to negotiate with north. let keep our resolution forever as people.

    Reply to this message

  • 27 January 18:21, by Tambura

    S Sudan should not pay more then 3,40 for transit of crude oil to Port Sudan include infrastructure and refineries,that is fair,more than that is robbery unexpected.They have to reach the deal right now because the more tims it will take the more that pipeline will freeze,if it is reach to more then three months that pipeline for free we don t need it ,it will cost billions of dollars to change it

    Reply to this message

  • 27 January 19:02, by panom lualbil

    I agreed with idea of pipeline through kenya leaving khartoum alone. Because sharing with enemy is really unfair thing. Or we should continue to build pipe to kenya even if it’s possible for khartoum again to let us use theirs. This sequences of dispute on oil infrasture is never gonna stop but could result war again. And war has bad impacts particularly civilians like b4. Some of us are half Arab

    Reply to this message

  • 27 January 23:34, by Monydu

    I HOPE THAT MR. KIIR TALK TO AUHIP AND TELL THEM THAT ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. WE HAVE SURVIVED FOR SEVERAL YEARS WITHOUT OIL MONEY. PLEASE MR. PRESIDENT DON’T GO TO ADDIS BECAUSE THIS PEOPLE WANT TO HELP BASHIR WITH HIS CORRUPT GOVERNMENT.OUR OIL MONEY CAN HELP MANY GENERATIONS TO COME RATHER HELP THOSE IDIOTS IN KHARTOUM. THANKS ONCE AGAIN MY PEOPLE FOR DECIDING TO SHUTDOWN EXPORT THROUGH PORT SUDAN

    Reply to this message

  • 28 January 01:47, by Daniel Buolmawei

    "The president of Sudan Omer Hassan al-Bashir is expected to hold a summit in Addis Ababa on Friday with his southern counterpart Salva Kiir along with Ethiopian prime minister Meles Zenawi and Kenyan president Mwai Kibaki."

    My worry always attached to the so-called talks between heads of state. Kiir is so weak politically. He can be lured to agree something unwise and unreasonable.

    Reply to this message

  • 28 January 01:52, by Daniel Buolmawei

    He will now be among those of Meles Zenawi of Ethiopia, Mwai Kibaki of Kenya and al-Bashir of Sudan, and God knows how he will behave and react against their proposals. His head will be down, his shoulder lowered and his message softened as usual as I know him. He sits upright and tough when he’s in Juba, and reduce himself to Governor when he’s out of Juba. We want a tough president, daring leade

    Reply to this message

Reply to this article


 

Do you support South Sudan decision to halt oil production?




 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Bold decision needs bold actions 2012-02-22 08:07:42 By Luka Biong Deng February 21, 2012 — I would like with the launching of the first issue of New Nation Newspaper to sincerely congratulate President Salva for his bold decision of closing down (...)

South Sudanese, please stop harassing aliens 2012-02-22 08:05:00 By Isaiah Abraham February 21, 2012 — After independence of South Sudan from the Republic of the Sudan six months ago, the people of the South (say some) have started to misbehave towards other (...)

South Sudan, don’t be scared by Bashir’s threats! 2012-02-20 11:55:32 By: Luk Kuth Dak “ our unity is our best defense against Sudan,” The author. February 19, 2012 — Most people with some knowledge about warfare would be the first to tell you that the republic of (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


AI: SUDANESE YOUTH ACTIVISTS RELEASED 2012-02-11 03:17:26 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL SUDANESE YOUTH ACTIVISTS RELEASED The six members of the student-led movement Girifna who were arrested on 25 January have been released from Kober prison in Khartoum, (...)

South Sudan: Justice Needed to Stem Violence 2012-02-11 03:15:02 Human Rights Watch South Sudan: Justice Needed to Stem Violence Prosecute Those Responsible, Seek International Investigation (New York, February 10, 2012) – South Sudan should urgently ensure (...)

Plea by Paris lawyer on behalf of journalists imprisoned in Eritrea 2012-02-09 02:15:22 Reporters Without Borders Advocacy 8 February 2012 ERITREA Plea by Paris lawyer on behalf of journalists imprisoned in Eritrea Just two weeks from now, 22 February, is the third anniversary (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2012 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.