Home page | News    Wednesday 8 February 2012

Khartoum warns of reaction to any aggression by South Sudan

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

February 7, 2012 (KHARTOUM) – The Sudanese government has vowed to respond in kind if South Sudan initiates any hostile action, in the latest escalation of rhetoric between the two countries as they prepare to embark on a fresh round of talks.

JPEG - 11.9 kb
The official spokesperson of Sudan’s foreign ministry Al-Obaid Marawih

Sudan and South Sudan appear to be on the brink of renewed conflict as their already-tense relations reached its nadir in recent weeks due to a bitter dispute over oil.

"The climate now is closer to a climate of war than one of peace," Sudan’s president Omer Bashir said in an interview this week after his government’s decision to confiscate southern oil pumped through Sudan’s territories prompted the government in Juba to halt oil production all together.

South Sudan’s President Salva Kiir responded on Monday by launching a barrage of criticism against Al-Bashir, saying that Juba is ready for war if Khartoum attempts to attack.

Kiir also accused Khartoum of amassing its troops along the contested borders with his country in preparation for an invasion.

Reacting to Kiir’s tough statements, the official spokesman of Sudan’s foreign ministry, Al-Obaid Marawih, on Tuesday said that Khartoum was closely studying the implications of Kiir’s speech.

“If we become certain beyond any doubt that the South is preparing to fight Sudan, our duty requires us to confront any hostile action,” he told reporters in Khartoum.

However, he emphasized Sudan’s commitment to good neighborly relations with the south, pointing out that Khartoum is still keen to reach fair settlement to the issues of contention between the two countries during their next round of negotiations scheduled to take place in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa on 10 February.

Previous round of talks held in Addis Ababa under the meditation of the African Union High Level Panel (AUHIP) failed to break the dispute as the gap remained wide between the oil transit fees demanded by Khartoum, $32 per barrel, and the 74 cent South Sudan says it is prepared to pay.

Meanwhile, the special envoy of the UN Secretary-General to Sudan Haile Menkerios held talks on Tuesday with the Sudanese minister of foreign affairs Ali Karti in Khartoum.

Marawih told reporters that the meeting discussed arrangements for the next round of talks.

The spokesman further revealed that his boss Karti informed the UN envoy that Khartoum would not hesitate to adopt a decisive position against Juba if the latter acts in defiance of good relations.

There is little optimism that the two sides will manage to resolve the oil dispute during the upcoming round of negotiations.

Direct talks between Al-Bashir and Kiir on the margins of the IGAD summit in Addis Ababa in late January collapsed despite efforts by regional leaders to bring the pair to sign an AUHIP proposal to end the oil crisis.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 8 February 06:41, by mohammed ali

    It is not about oil ST!Donnot mislead the public.Oil belongs to SS 100%,they have the right to stop it if so they wish.It is about millitary interference in SK & BN.This must stop,otherwise SAF will not just watch SPLA fighting within our borders!This is excately what had been said.Sudan Tribune chooses what suits it’s propoganda to inflame the situation.Nobody is going to fight for SS oil!

    Reply to this message

    • 8 February 07:10, by omoni jr.

      Brother ALI,
      Are you sudan spokeperson ? why are you trying to divert the topic and create one that does not make sense? The whole of the article does not mentioned anything related to military intervention or support in blue nile or south kordofan.Man, do not twist the information.The war is about the OIL,period.if there was No oil in south sudan, then we would have been separated long time ago.

      Reply to this message

      • 8 February 07:24, by SeekingTruth

        THANK U BROTHER OMONI JR. FOR ANSWERING MR. GREAT DENIAL AKA MOHAMMED ALI,
        THOUGH U SEEM TO BE FLOATING ON IDEAS SOMETIMES U HAVE ANSWERED HIM APPROPRIATELY.

        Reply to this message

        • 9 February 12:02, by Paul Ongee

          Ya Al-Ob-aid,

          Who doesn’t have the brain to study the implications of Mr. Omer Al-Bashir’s speech that "The climate is more closer to war than peace" following the failure of oil deal in Addis Ababa? Khartoum doesn’t have army any more to fight on five fronts because people from SK, BN, Darfur, Eastern Sudan and Southern Sudan will no longer be there to fight for Khartoum to control S. Sudan’s oi

          Reply to this message

          • 9 February 12:14, by Paul Ongee

            Ya Mohamed Ali,

            Don’t mislead readers. N-S borders are no demarcated, Abyei Referendum not held and other post-independence issues are not resolved simply because of oil (economic reasons) NOT security concerns you’re trying to proclaim. BN & SK are fighting Khartoum for their rights of freedom because popular consultation is never made popularly. Got it?

            Reply to this message

      • 8 February 07:47, by mohammed ali

        Omoni, that excately what I mean to say! The whole article was diverted to mean that the dispute is about oil.That is not the case! That was not what was said by the spokes person of the ministry.He said specificly that the oil deal is an ordinary commercial deal you can take it , leave or compormise, that is it!

        Reply to this message

        • 8 February 07:55, by mohammed ali

          Omoni, if you noticed the first line " he said he will respond to any agression..." Stopping oil is not aggression, it is yours and there is no logic a war if you donnot transport oil through our land; it is your decision & your right.ST tribune propoganda machine want to say something else!

          Reply to this message

          • 8 February 09:20, by Gatkuoth

            He also warned his council of ministers of the possibility of returning to war with the new nation and accused Juba of shutting down the oil production with intention to provoke a “collapse” of the Sudanese government. He said blamed his southern counterpart Salva Kiir for refusing to signing an oil deal when they met in Ethiopia last week

            Reply to this message

            • 8 February 19:23, by Anynya One

              Mohamed AL!.. I guess you acting like having or showing a strong desire and determination to succeed on something by bagging recklessly. You one of the dumbest kids I have ever came across. Kids get nice meal when they are smart but not for goofy ones like you. ...sorry! No oil. Do whatever you want to, but stop fooling or simply be punished; thus all..

              Reply to this message

          • 8 February 09:25, by Gatkuoth

            Ali, your president want to go to war because of shutting down the oil. that is the truth, it not because of supporting the rebels. South is not supporting the rebels, your government does support and adms the militia with landmines to destabilize south sudan since before its inception you also know your government is doing forceful recruitment of south sudanese to rebels .

            Reply to this message

          • 8 February 22:59, by Wen De David Kuol

            Khatuom adopted short cut to CPA by absorbing SPLA recklessly into SAF, that what cause the fighting Blue Nile and SK. South Sudan had no interest in Khartuom, we don’t want to link ourselves with terrorists specially Sudan ruling Party-NCP.
            We are not intending any aggression against Khartoum but we repeat if Khartuom and specially Nashir with Defend like to be hosted and dragged on Khartuom

            Reply to this message

      • 8 February 08:28, by Logic

        Sudan Tribune, you must be running out of news because this is not news worthy for public consumption.

        Those lazy NCP dogs shout all day about this and that. Stop wasting our time with recycled bits from old news.

        This latest escalation of tension is purely due to economics (OIL)!

        Reply to this message

        • 8 February 09:11, by mohammed ali

          Seems that it is the tradition of the softy , delicate & spoiled young boyes to use the same arrogant language existing in their arrogant families who had lost everything in Sudan, now their daughters are wandering in the streets of London, where everthingthing is possible and allowed, might be welcomed by their " high class" families!Gone are the days!

          Reply to this message

          • 8 February 19:32, by Anynya One

            Thanks for noticing that the days of foolery is over! Our time has come. Freedom which we often ’cry for the beloved country" is right at our door. It is our precious gift from GOD. And Stop wasting our time and minds. Watch out with your foolish Arab strategies!

            Reply to this message

      • 9 February 03:57, by Force 1

        Khartoum shouldn’t wish for the war they are not going to handle, this time it’s not going to be South Sudan alone, it’s going to be Darfur, South Kordofan, Blue-Nile and South Sudan.

        This is going to be four against one. The destination for Khartoum is going to be the red sea, just beat the drums of war and think of the consequences!

        Reply to this message

    • 8 February 11:14, by morogot batal

      mohamed ali

      why dont you think of what you are doing to murle and nuer since 1980s up to date...why is it very hot to you when a part of SPLA N left south to their area to continue their revolution of their right that was violated by NCP.and you know well that,nuba, blue nile and abyei are also having articles in CPA witnesssed by international comunity?why dont you think of how you steal south o

      Reply to this message

    • 9 February 04:16, by Daniel Buolmawei

      "The spokesman further revealed that his boss Karti informed the UN envoy that Khartoum would not hesitate to adopt a decisive position against Juba if the latter acts in defiance of good relations."

      Mohammed, interepret the paragraph above. All empty political rhotorics such as "we are studying" Kiir’s speech and such. How about South Sudan studying all rhtorics coming from Khartoum? Just kids

      Reply to this message

  • 8 February 06:47, by Tamongali

    these are just war of words. non of them is ready to bear the consequences of war considering the critical economic situation they are facing at a moment.

    Reply to this message

  • 8 February 07:04, by Madina Tonj

    Mohammed Ali

    It was Omar al Bashir who told his NCP members that, the war between S.Sudan and N.Sudan is possible if nothing come out to be sign. Most NCP officials were speaking too arrogant saying, if S.Sudan gov, close oil pipeline then, the South Sudan will be suffers than N.Sudan but when the S.Sudan close then, all NCP and Omar al Bashir became desperate.Used your port for other not oil

    Reply to this message

    • 8 February 08:13, by mohammed ali

      Tonj, he NEVER said we go to war if the south didn’t sign the oil deal, NEVER. What he said is that the enviorment between SS & Sudan now is more closer to war than to peace particulary because of the SS interference in SK & BN, never the less we will seek the road towards peace and not towards war.ST manupilated what he said to look like a threat of war!

      Reply to this message

      • 8 February 11:43, by morogot batal

        mohamed ali....
        read nafie article on the 7/2/2012
        khartoum will respond strongly to any attempt to sabotage sudanese economy or destroy oil infrastructure facilities.....the question remain as.... what will be our problem with sudan economy and oil infrastructure facilities after halting our oil prodution???????????any way we are ready...go on

        Reply to this message

      • 9 February 04:28, by Daniel Buolmawei

        Mohammed, please stop denial. All threatened statements and rhotorics coming from Khartoum escalated as a result of the shutting down of the oil. You have been arming militias in the south for years, have we said anything? You are arming South Sudanese now in Unity State, Upper Nile State and Jonglei State, why don’t you stop arming these militias if your goals are peace. No matter how you want---

        Reply to this message

        • 9 February 04:32, by Daniel Buolmawei

          To twist it. The world understands that it is the shutting down of oil in the south that causes outrage and extreme anger in Khartoum’s criminals and indictees. A fact that will lead to the demise of Khartoum if the people of Sudan blinding support these hijacking gangs who don’t know how to pull themselves out of the mess they created.

          Reply to this message

  • 8 February 07:07, by Jervasio O.Okot

    It’s really ridiculous reading a reaction of Khartoum to the answers which President Bashir expected from the President of the RSS, Dr. Salva Kiir Mayardit when he (Bashir) began beating the drums of war through his offensive language delivered before his cabinet. What does Al-Obaid Marawih mean for going to study implication of Dr. Kiir’s language while forgetting that of his boss?

    Reply to this message

  • 8 February 07:15, by George Bol

    I love the way khartoum are crying. The Dr Garang legacy is always there. and the power of SPLM/A must be respected. We are the liberators.SPLM/A oyeee

    Reply to this message

    • 8 February 07:24, by Acinitos

      Do not change tone of your voice Carwardy, the message from Vip was clear do not beat drums of war Period.

      Reply to this message

    • 8 February 08:20, by Dinka Dominated SPLA/M

      George Bol
      We from Awan Chan recognised the great job done by SPLA/M lead by his holy wisdom visionary Dr John Garang,

      Ali Osman become useless now in khartoum because everything signed in CPA was done on Dr John favor,

      The man really know how to play a leadership very well

      Kiir Mayardit know how to play a trick too by followed what SPLA/M was fighting for,

      Beny Kiir is doing great,

      Reply to this message

      • 8 February 08:30, by Dinka Dominated SPLA/M

        The CPA was really a trick that can lat back stabbing gang give up,

        It was negotiated throught trick that can not be done by non other then the born Dinka’s blood person,

        Because of this CPA trick, some high profile in khartoum become low profile they are being belame for this, they Knew that hte Dinka born Dr John can win and case in the pace,

        We love you Dr and we are proud of mr Kiir,

        Reply to this message

        • 8 February 12:41, by Ruach

          My friend Mangoor.Don’t bring your useless Awan chan here in the discussion.We are not talking of ur damn awan Cheth!!Go and follow your bald man in the hell.Hell to awan cheth!

          Reply to this message

        • 8 February 12:46, by Ruach

          Nobody knows you useless Awan chan/ceth.Liel muor

          Reply to this message

      • 8 February 11:57, by morogot batal

        to dinkas dominated corrupties

        we are not in a dinka awan chan task... we are in south sudan task...get a lesson from the word comrade... it doesnt mean that we are working under some body or tribe....their is no defferent between you and NCP showing their greedy all over sudan that lead to a total desuster...you are not proud of dinka but you are the enemy of dinka...please warn you self

        Reply to this message

  • 8 February 09:07, by Samuel Mabior

    when the cheating wife is divorced by rich man, she realizes that she lost everything she had, that is the way all these arabs are behaving now and at the end of the day they will end up dead hanging on the roof of their houses or kneel down to be slaves of the South Sudanese.one day one time North sudanese will return to where they came from

    Reply to this message

    • 8 February 10:32, by Joseph Canada

      Well my friend, this is the right way of death to Arabs. Now they will realize that it was wrong to migrate to Africa rather than to stay in the middle east under the Otoman’s Empire. as I say before, today is the oil and tomorrow is the Nile. that’s when the turbans on the head is used to wipe the backside coz there’s no water.

      Reply to this message

  • 8 February 17:11, by Tambura

    Before yesterday they were talking about Juba is not far,Today they are talking about aggression by south Sudan not war. What change the language? Let me tell you what happened,Qatar yesterday just paid them $2 billions,I said this billions will change the language of war today.Now instead of talking about how they ll reach Juba now they are saying they ll react to any aggression from south Sudan.

    Reply to this message

  • 8 February 17:55, by James Maker Akok

    You north Sudan want to fight South Sudan if South Sudan disagree to sign Oil agreement. If I was president Kiir I will not sign Oil agreement with North Sudan.

    Reply to this message

Reply to this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Is UNSC only legitimate to Sudan in complaint times? 2012-05-20 01:45:00 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 19, 2012 — Sudanese leaders seem to think they are smarter than anybody else in this world. They seem to recognize the legitimacy of the United Nations Security (...)

Sudan’s NCP, an obstacle to peaceful co-existence 2012-05-20 01:30:00 By Jacob K. Lupai May 19, 2012 — Peaceful co-existence is what is expected of people the world over in promoting security. Nevertheless, how does peaceful co-existence come about? There are many (...)

On the African Union road map and UN resolution 2046 2012-05-20 01:00:00 By Gamal Adam My 18, 2012 — The African Union’s recent road map which the United Nations Security Council has endorsed with the Resolution 2046 includes a clause that puts pressure on the Sudan (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Opposition leader under house arrest 2012-05-18 20:40:02 AI - Amnesty International Opposition leader under house arrest 18 May 2012 Ezdehar Jumaa Said Ahmad, a leader of the opposition Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North, is under house arrest. (...)

AI: SUDANESE JOURNALIST FACES HARASSMENT 2012-05-18 20:27:17 Amnesty International SUDANESE JOURNALIST FACES HARASSMENT 18 May 2012 Faisal Mohammed Salih, a prominent journalist and columnist from Sudan who had been arrested by the National Security (...)

AMNESTY: HEALTH CONCERNS FOR DETAINED ACTIVIST 2012-05-11 20:18:33 Amnesty International Health Concerns For Detained Activist - Bushra Gammar Hussein Rahma 11 May 2012 More than ten months after his arrest, Sudanese activist Bushra Gamar Hussein Rahma (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2012 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.