Home | Comment & Analysis    Thursday 27 November 2008

ICC Vs. SUDAN: Calculating the cost

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By Kwathi Ajawin

November 26, 2008 — What makes it difficult for some to join the debate on our Sudanese forums on the issue of the ICC is the bickering; wrangling and impatient of some who are very quick to label others as pro or against Al-Bashir. Forums should be for people to freely analysis and contribute their ideas and others to counter the logic without attacking the personality of the contributor.

The argument that SPLM should support the ICC because the NIF will not honor the CPA is very short-sighted, because the ICC is aimed at bring justice to the people of Darfur and it has nothing to do with the implementation of the CPA. So far the ICC is asking for the indictment of the president Al-Bashir and in course of that process it might topple the government of Khartoum which is one of the pillars of the CPA.

Is the implementation of the CPA under the mercy of the ICC and the situation in Darfur?

Some suggested that if SPLM think that the CPA is not being implemented then they should act now to protect the CPA instead of waiting for ICC mercy. The last time we heard chairman Kiir on the CPA he was satisfied with the implementation of the CPA.

We must learn from Ahamed Shilby of Iraq who thought the American tanks will easily topple Sadam regime and crown him president of Iraq. Now almost six years of the Iraq invasion, the war is taking a huge toll on the US, the global economy and Ahamed Shilby is no where on the political horizon. Above all the American electorates have voted for a change in a popular rejection of war and its sisters.

Some call the Darfur rebels as our allies and friends, well politics is the game of interest and it is clear that the Darfur rebels have very little in common with the SPLM. People have learnt a lot through experience that a common enemy is not an enough foundation for building alliance. Enemies of today might be friend of tomorrow we are told. Darfur have a lot in common with northern Sudanese as they are all the political north and the main political agenda of most if not all northern Sudanese politicians is maintaining the unity of Sudan and spreading Islam at any cost. One should only read the peace plan of the Darfur rebels and you will come to the conclusion that they do not endorse the self-determination for South Sudan. Is it a surprise! to many the answer is no, as some of the Darfur rebels leaders were once NIF Jihadists who fought against the independence of the South.

Darfur rebels and the Jalaba of SPLM think naively that Self-determination for Southern Sudan can be nullified and unity made attractive by nominating a Southern Sudan to the presidency of Sudan. Well, if that simply the case, I guess they should have made late Dr. Garang the president of Sudan instead of VP.

Having a Southern Sudanese as a president might make unity attractive to some but not Southern Sudanese who will not sale their freedom cheap with one time presidency. No one in his sound mind will commit such a sin especially when all know that Jacob became Israel and not Esau who couldn’t calculate the cost.

ICC scenario is something to be celebrated by only the boneheads, because if Khartoum decides to face the ICC then the possibility of bringing down the whole enterprise is there and the parasitic GOSS might be the first to collapse before the government in Khartoum comes down. The last JEM fail attempt on Khartoum exposed the Coup de tat mentality of Darfur rebels and clearly illustrated that the claim for justice before peace is nothing but a thirst for power. Yes, the aspirations of the Darfur people are legitimate but at the same time should not be allowed to be misuse by few for personal gains. The cost of Justice before Peace must be well calculated.

ICC can only be supported if the total independence is a move in response to the Al-Bashir confrontation with the international community. Nevertheless, the question is what preparation has been made by SPLM and GOSS to make that transition less costly?

Let us not just bit the war drums especially those of us who did not join the war last time and I mean those who did not physically go to the ground as combatants.

ICC indictment is bigger than Al-Bashir as a person and must not be taken lightly by any concern southern Sudanese.

As the clock tick the start of the count down of Al-Bashir indictment, the question should be, is the South ready to declare its independence from the parliament in Juba or are some still plotting to take over the government in Khartoum.

Be aware of the Somalia fiasco, if the ruling elites in Juba run away to enjoy the millions abroad, you have either the junior officers in SPLA take over the South or a big junk of the South might fall under LRA.

Those who count on America and the ICC must remember that we still deal with the same mentality that thought “chock and awe” will be an easy fix to Iraq situation. What Darfur might get from Obama administration is a No Fly Zone.

Yes, America can multitask but some project that the honey moon between ICC and Washington might be put on halt and Ocampo might be asked to stay on his lane and watch his speed. Though Sudan is very different from Iraq still all the ICC players should know that it is biblical to calculate the cost

The author is a Sudanese church and community leader based in Washington, DC., and can be reached at Akolkwathi@yahoo.com



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 27 November 2008 04:04, by Kim Deng

    Mr. Akol,

    You’re very right on your article. Of course, politic is a game of interest. Yet, our African brothers from Darfur failed short to see the reality on the ground. They formed their movements instead of supporting Garang’s vision of "New Sudan." What if they (Darfurians) overran Khartoum and overthrawn the arabized Nubian govt (NIF) from power in May attempt? With no doubt the CPA should have been on burning fire as of previous accords.

    The main focus from the GoSS should be on demarcation of south-north border in case South declare its independence if things get ugly.

    ICC and Darfur case cannot hold South hostage because these cases are not connected to implementation of CPA.

    Thanks,

    Kimdeng85@yahoo.com

    repondre message

    • 28 November 2008 06:01, by julius mowanga

      Mr;Akol...you missed the point by thinking that,there is no link between CPA and Darfur Movements stand.There is a very sensitive link between em,First;if the Darfur conflict resolved a power sharing in the NGS,Which party of the CPA partners will sacrifice it’s gain of power sharing,that implemented by CPA?SPLM already expressed their refusal for such proposal!!Which indicate non-concern of Darfur issue.Secondly;the sum of the all Sudan financial revenue to the Darfur,who will agree to cut a peace of that cake,gained by CPA?
      I opposed the so called CPA,once the Darfur conflict not resolved,and the Est Sudan front as well.Why Dr;John Garang refused to sign CPA,when it didn;t addressed the Abbyei matter?.The most default of the so called CPA, NOT TO BRING PEACE TO SUDAN,BUT TO BE USED AS A TOOL TO DISMANTLE THE ISLAMIC REGIME OF NCP .So if the regime in Khartoum toppled by the Darfurians,Goss follows as consequential,partner sharing the wealth and power with NCP.The International Community that witnessed and ratified the CPA,will be the first of the world states to recognize and acknowledge the Darfurian Government,just because they accomplished what they intended by using CPA without bloodshed.The western Powers and USA,will be happy to see the end of the pro-Islamic terrorism regime of NCP gone with the wind,and THE CESSATION or the Independence of South Sudan will never be considered due to the economic needs.So when C.I.C Omar albashir ordered the destruction of Darfur,Silva Kiir wasn’t aware about the consequences of his partner’s indictment.Which means Salva kiir and GOSS officials,share the responsibility and the fate of their president Omar Albashir.The Justice Is BLIND,BUT WITH A VERY LONG HAND

      repondre message

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Wedding in Juba - How can you tell if a bridegroom works for Nilepet? 2017-02-24 05:25:41 By Deng Kiir Akok The Nile Petroleum Corporation is a national Oil and Gas Corporation, which engages in oil exploration, production and marketing. Famous for its abbreviation Nilepet has been a (...)

Bashir’s congratulation for Trump remains double-edged sword 2017-02-21 08:47:41 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman This is a note to the readers of this article about my use of the phrase double-edged sword. It means that Omar al-Bashir’s Speedy congratulation offer to Donald Trump (...)

South Sudan: Why ’NO’ for peace and ’YES’ for war 2017-02-20 20:45:12 By Tor Madira Machier The region and the International community has been on a campaign in a bid to end the civil war in South Sudan right after its inception in December 2013, yet the very (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


Militias of Bashir’s Regime and the Proxy War (1) 2017-02-08 21:49:09 Sudan Democracy First Group Militias of Bashir’s Regime and the Proxy War (1) War in the Blue Nile: Militias in the hunt of refugees and displaced population Introduction Throughout its rule, (...)

More refugees flee to Uganda than across Mediterranean 2017-01-25 09:15:39 January 25, 2017 Uganda welcomed more refugees last year than the total number of refugees and migrants crossing the Mediterranean into Europe. “Europe should learn from the way Uganda and other (...)

Carter Center welcomes new regulations on humanitarian affairs 2017-01-12 07:53:16 The Carter Center ATLANTA, Januarg 11, 2017 – The Carter Center welcomes the recent regulations issued by the government of Sudan aimed at facilitating humanitarian relief throughout the country (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2017 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.