Home | Comment & Analysis    Tuesday 3 April 2012

Heglig has not and will never be part of South Kordofan

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By Dhieu Mathok Diing Wol

April 2, 2012 — The Heglig village locally known as Panthou of Panarou Dinka of Panrang county in Unity State has not been a part of South Kordofan as alleged by the Khartoum government.

The processes of annexing the area to the North have intensified recently during the Ingaz regime (The Salvation). It came to surfacing clearly for the first time in 1997 when Omer al Bashir the President of the Sudan registered an official visit to Heglig for the opening of the Oilfields.

The state government in Western Kordofan (before the state was abolished and annexed to South Kordofan after the signing of CPA in 2005) organized an opening ceremony of the oilfields and the visit of the president in the area to officially opening of the oilfields on the ground that Heglig is a part of the former Western Kordofan State. The state government led by Lit. Gen. Police Abdelrahaman Muktar ordered commissioner of the Peace province that includes Abyei, al Miaram and Muglid to transport Dinka Ngok citizens residing at Abyei and surrounding areas to the place of the ceremony at Heglig in order to welcome the president and participate in the occasion under cover that the area is a part of Abyei and hence perceived to be owned by the Dinka Ngok.

This strategy was not known to the state government in Unity state. The recently appointed Ambassador Micheal Mayiel Choul who was the Wali (Governor) of the state by then was not aware about this conspiracy. When the Governor of Unity State arrived at the place of the ceremony with his cabinet members, he found the place and the occasion were totally hijacked by the Western Kordofan government and the populace from Abyei area. They were welcomed as guests from the neighboring state. He was denied a speech in the opening ceremony, and Abdelrahaman Muktar was accorded the welcoming remarks as the host state and to welcome as well the president to deliver his speech and officially opened the project.

Upon receiving the copy of the programme, Mr. Micheal Mayiel reacted immediately and objected to the programme. The two governors exchanged insulting words in front of the president on the entitlement of who supposed to give the speech in this important occasion and the ownership of the area. The president stepped in and asked the two governors to present their speeches as the area belongs to all Sudanese people, according to his assertion. The oilfields were officially opened on the assumption that the area is a part of Western Kordofan NOT SOUTH KORDOFAN.

In 1999 when the first oil produced in the Sudan was shipped to international market at Bashair port in Port Sudan, again the chance was given to the oil-producing states; the two governors of the Western Kordofan and Unity State were asked to clamp into podium and present their speeches.

Subsequently, the conspiracy of annexing Heglig to the North becomes clearer during the annual presentation of the state government reports to the National Council of Ministers. The Council witnessed a serious debate over the issue between the Northerners and Southerners, who were members when the two governors of Unity State and Western Kordofan gave their reports about the situation in Heglig differently. The cabinet members from Southern Sudan who were attending the meeting took stance and supported the Governor Dr. Joseph Monytuil, the current MP and former Minister of Health and the Presidential Adviser.

The situation becomes complicated when the CPA was signed, and the Abyei Boundary Commission (ABC) was formed. The ABC was mandated to draw Abyei boundaries. The experts made the mistake by including Heglig and other areas in western part of the area to Abyei territories. Maybe the assumption was that since there was confusion surrounding status of Heglig it could be best solved within the ABC mechanism.

It was on this line the Court of Arbitration in The Hague came out and dismissed the claimed that Heglig is part of Abyei. The judges indicated what supposed to be the Abyei boundaries and left out what they believed not to be geographically part of that area.

The NCP intentionally misinterpreted the ruling, exploited it and claimed that the ruling was a justification of their assertion that the Court had confirmed their claim over Heglig, since the ruling was silenced about it, without knowing that Heglig was purposely left out as it has nothing to do with the ABC report. One can see this in the way how the NCP has been dealing with the ruling of the Court; appreciating part of the ruling and condemning part of it.

The information that the area was literally claimed to be part of Western Kodofan and NOT SOUTH KORDOFAN is very significant to the readers to see the degree of confusion and weak position on the side of the invaders of Heglig area. It is important because it will enable us relating geopolitics of the area to the historical events, because South Kordofan, which is bordering Panrang County was supposed to be the one claiming the ownership of Heglig from that very time and not Western Kordofan and the clashes on who supposed to speak in the opening ceremony of the oilfields were expected to be between Mr. Micheal Mayiel Choul the governor of Unity State and the late MagizubYusuf Babaker the governor of South Kordofan and NOT between Micheal and Muktar. However, because the conspiracy was designed to make the area, a part of the disputed Abyei, this scenario could take that form.

Dr. Dhieu Mathok is a former minister in the Sudan and author of Politics of Ethnic Discrimination in Sudan: A Justification for the Secession of South Sudan. He can be reached at aromjok@yahoo.com.



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 3 April 2012 06:46, by Madina Tonj

    Dr. Wen Mathok Diing Wol

    I think it is clearly that, Khartoum regime are interesting in oil areas and they are not interesting on the real people just to give you good example. They poorly unprofound claim on Abyei while, the people itself says, they are part of South Sudan. In the last year, they force Nubian people saying, if they don’t accept disarming then, they should move to South Sudan

    repondre message

  • 3 April 2012 08:02, by Atungdiak

    You’re absolutely right Dr. Dhiew!

    Our brothers in Abyei, backed by some naive individuals pulled this Country into a strategic blunder by claiming Panthou was part of Abyei. Panaru community objected to this move and petitioned Dr. Garang in Naivasha in 2004 when Abyei protocol was being negotated, but were not listened to. That’s why it became part of Hague rulling.

    repondre message

  • 3 April 2012 08:03, by Lango2010

    yes Heglig indeed part of the RSS, we are not gona a leave to thieves who have no shame since their creation. but one thing we have to do is to forget our tribals differences and united as on Nation, than God will back us up, and territorial borders must be unattachable by Dogs.

    repondre message

  • 3 April 2012 08:07, by Atungdiak

    The Hague judges rightly ruled that Panthou does not fall inside Abyei territory.They also never said it was part of Kordofan nor Unity State because their mandate was not to demarcate Sudan and South Sudan borders. This is why the NCP claim it it’s South Kordofan. Moreover the same day, the Abyei gangs when on air and say the area actually never belonged to them but to Panaru people. See the mess

    repondre message

  • 3 April 2012 08:10, by Atungdiak

    Before Hague rulling, South Sudan was getting oil shares ffom Panthou, which they stopped after the ruling. This means a lot. By then, SPLA was in Karasana (Further North), which is the 1956 border. Immediately, SAF created pressure and fought SPLA forces there. Then Taban, the Unity State governor signed MOU annexing Karasana to South Kordofan. See that? Our own faults. Where was the president?

    repondre message

    • 3 April 2012 12:43, by mohammed ali

      Ironically, you pretend to support rebells in SK! Obviously you are using them to " steal " their land & resources.Heglig is in Sudan; you csn never ever change this!

      repondre message

      • 3 April 2012 19:20, by Rommel

        Mohammed Ali:

        The palapable hypocrisy in your condemnation of apparent theft beggars belief. It’s Khartoum -and not South Sudan- which has historically engaged in territorial larceny. It was during the latter stages of President Nimeiri’s rule (1969-1985), that Khartoum began arming proxies with the aim of pushing the border further south.

        repondre message

        • 3 April 2012 19:31, by Rommel

          Militias and irregular security forces, especially those recruited among nomadic Baggara tribes in northern border states, were the central instrument of this policy.

          Brutal raids displaced Dinka and Nuer communities southward, thereby asserting Khartoum’s control over coveted territory and resources.

          repondre message

          • 3 April 2012 19:35, by Rommel

            Khartoum has been inveterately engaged in a practice of redrawing maps and changing names (eg, Heglig) as part of a deliberate attempt to detach and appropriate coveted territory. Aliny ("Heglig") has NEVER been the historical home of any *Nuban* or "Arab" tribe! The same is true of the Kafia Kingi enclave and Hofrat en Nahas.

            repondre message

            • 3 April 2012 19:46, by Rommel

              There was no "Heglig" prior to the advent of Jafaar Nimeri on the political stage in Sudan. There were no Arabs in Aliny prior to the late 1980s - they don’t belong there! The 1956 border is what we so desperately enforced, as per the provisions of the CPA. Our acceptance of the colonial 1956 border (s) is in itself an example of a concession on our part.

              repondre message

              • 3 April 2012 20:02, by Rommel

                There were many British changes to the border that awarded our lands to Northern pastoralist. The Wheately-Munro Agreement for example changed the South Darfur-Northern Bahr al Ghazal border; this colonial dictate set the administrative border 14 miles south of the Kiir River, changing the 1912 line that had set the boundary at the river.

                repondre message

  • 4 April 2012 07:40, by Atungdiak

    Thank God there are brilliant Rommels in South Sudan! Mohamed Ali knows exactly what their game plan has always been but, no piece of land shall be taken from RSS after CPA concession to draw borders according to 1 Jan 1956!

    We are peace loving people but will swiftly deal with war mongerS’ agents, the SAF; PDF; Mujaheediin etc in defense of our land and shall do so till the last man remains

    repondre message

  • 4 April 2012 08:17, by zulu

    Although I like Cowboy Kiir, he is the reason to blame for the lack of using force against lunacy and mandacity of NCP. Use the helicopter gunships and get fighters as well since it is no secret. Even Khartoum is using the same. We have antonov as well. Use them as a tit for tat. These cleptocrats should be dealt exactly in this manner.

    repondre message

  • 6 April 2012 04:37, by acuil deng

    Sudan is vaguely disputing "Abyei and Heglig [Aliyn]" with South Sudan, because both regions are oil-rich. In 1958, Sudan disputed "Egypt" over (Hala’ib Triangle) - subsequent to its independence from England in 1956 - forcing (Gamal Abdel Nasser) of Egypt to take (Hala’ib) by force-still Egyptian. And as such, "Abyei and [Aliyn]" de facto control should be by South Sudan.

    repondre message

  • 6 April 2012 06:53, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

    Jallaba has been fighting for control of all the resources of South Sudan including oil. So let no one be deceived that Jallaba likes the citizens of the country. Their deeds, rhetoric utterances are enough to justify this even before 1955.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


National unity: a project for each and every South Sudanese 2013-05-21 14:23:01 By Jacob K. Lupai May 21, 2013 - South Sudan has just attained independence from an imposed unity that had failed miserably to take into account the objective realities on the ground. In the old (...)

Unity and reconciliation necessary for sustainable peace in Darfur 2013-05-21 14:19:47 By Adeeb Yousif May 20, 2013 -The biggest challenge in the Darfur conflict today is divisions. These divisions have created misunderstanding and mistrust within Darfurian society. Moreover they (...)

The Invasion of Abyei: two years of more agony 2013-05-20 05:39:13 By Luka Biong Deng May 19, 2013 - On 21st May 2013, the people of Abyei have spent two years of more agony and they will remember again the sad memories of how their lives and livelihoods were (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Sudan: Anatomy of a Conflict—New Report from Harvard Humanitarian Initiative 2013-05-22 00:46:46 Harvard Researchers Publish Satellite Imagery-Based History of Conflict in Sudan 2000+ Civilian Structures Appear Intentionally Destroyed; Humanitarian Agencies Targeted May 21, 2013 (...)

Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.