Email
Print
Save
August 15, 2011 (KHARTOUM) – Chronic mismanagement is a major factor behind South Sudan’s split from the north, according to the governor of a northern state abutting the south.
- Malik Agar, head of the northern branch of the Sudan People Liberation Movement (SPLM) speaks during a joint news conference with SPLM north’s secretary general Yasir Arman, in Khartoum, July 3, 2011 (Reuters)
Sudan split in two in July 9 when the south officially seceded in line with the outcome of the region’s vote on independence at the start of this year. The plebiscite was promised under the Comprehensive Peace Agreement which ended in 2005 more than two decades of north-south civil wars.
Malik Aggar, governor of Sudan’s southern state of Blue Nile which lies on the ill-defined borders with the South, on Sunday addressed a farewell ceremony of 201 southern employers in his state’s capital Al-Damazin.
In his speech, Aggar said that mismanagement in Sudan was a major reason for the south’s split.
“Secession was caused by the policy of intolerance,” he added.
Aggar, who chairs the northern offshoot of Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) which rules the south, advised the southerners to “adopt the beautiful things from the north and refrain from intolerance.”
The Blue Nile State lies inside the north but it shared political and military struggle with the south. The state’s population largely sided with the south during the civil war with the north on basis of common grievances of neglect and underdevelopment.
Aggar expressed his dissatisfaction with the south’s secession but he later said he was optimistic the two countries could reunite. He added that the south’s resources could reflect positively on the level of development if these resources were to be used judiciously.
According to Aggar, problems occur in the south due to the lack of education
Under the CPA, Blue Nile State and South Kordofan were promised a plebiscite dubbed “popular consultation” in order to gauge local satisfaction with the agreement’s implementation and produce recommendations on re-structuring governance relationship with the north.
However, the popular consultation in Blue Nile stalled as South Kordofan descended into a state of war between the northern army and forces aligned with the south since early June.
Aggar lamented the fate of the “dying” popular consultation process. He pointed out that the vote was supposed to take place within the CPA’s six-year transitional period, adding that the transitional period has not been extended.
Sudan’s parliament last month endorsed a bill extending the popular consultation process by six months after its deadline expired with the end of the CPA in July.
Aggar previously warned that approving the law would be a violation of the CPA and that he would not recognize it.
He called on the citizens to "resist the unjust and oppressive law which was passed by a single party that represents no one but itself," in reference to the ruling National Congress Party in the north.
(ST)
Latest Comments & Analysis
South Sudan after Paanthou crisis 2012-05-14 01:35:00 By Steve Paterno May 13, 2012 — Diplomatically, when the Paanthou crisis occurred, South Sudan found itself unprepared and underrepresented in the diplomatic front. The diplomatic ferocity of its (...)
Sudan and South Sudan: Where are they heading? 2012-05-12 05:59:20 By Luka Biong Deng May 11, 2012 — When the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) was signed in 2005, the Sudanese and the international community were relieved as Sudan would be put on the path of (...)
Khartoum and the language of war: Who’s really listening? 2012-05-12 05:31:52 By Eric Reeves May 11, 2012 — Every day it becomes clearer that unless Juba buckles before Khartoum's extortionate demands, on a range of issues, then the regime will settle matters (...)
MORE