Home | News    Saturday 21 July 2012

Army bombarded Darfur rebels inside Sudanese territory - spokesperson

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

July 21, 2012 (KHARTOUM) — Sudan’s negotiating team denied that its army carried out a fresh aerial attack yesterday in South Sudan, stressing that its army was pursuing Darfur rebels inside Sudanese territory.

JPEG - 21.5 kb
Amb. Omer Dabab (SUNA)

South Sudan accused the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) of bombing Rumaker locality, north-west of Aweil town, capital of Northern Bahr el Ghazal State where two people were injured, local officials told Sudan Tribune.

Rebels belonging to the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) attempted to launch an attack through the South Sudanese territory, but the army dealt with them inside Sudan, said the spokesperson of the Sudanese delegation, Omer Dahab, in a statement to the official SUNA on Saturday morning.

"SAF did not penetrate inside the South Sudanese territory," he emphasised.

Khartoum and Juba agreed to establish a demilitarised zone along their common border, but the Sudanese government refuses a plan proposed by the AU mediation to line it.

The official spokesperson further said Sudan reaffirmed, in a recent statement, its readiness to defend its territory. He also stressed the willingness of the Sudanese delegation to resume direct talks.

The two delegations opted in a deal, reached on 7 July, to carry out negotiations without mediation, as the AU team is criticised by both sides.

Atif Kiir, the spokesperson of the South Sudanese delegation, told Al-Jazeera TV that they are no longer ready to continue direct talks with the Khartoum team and demanded to return to the discussions in the presence of the mediation.

The parties said they are committed to reach a comprehensive agreement before the deadline of 2 August fixed by the UN Security Council in its resolution 2046.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 21 July 2012 11:02, by zulu

    Indeed an impressive evasion, but plainly stupid and cowardices. Why would you bambard a teritory and then say it was not targeted? You know the consequencies economically. socially and politically. But every action is action that has a consequence. The mighty spla will not listen to its commander in chief anly longer. tha academy will not fail itself but uphold itself to the princicple of sovtnty

    repondre message

    • 21 July 2012 12:07, by Dhong Bang

      they are just looking for what they called 14 miles inside south sudan territory by force but without a colonial map to support their claim. shame on them

      repondre message

    • 21 July 2012 12:38, by zulu

      Bombard rebels inside Sudan? Really? We will prove the same

      repondre message

  • 21 July 2012 11:21, by Anti Dinka’s

    you absolutely correct MR Zulu

    Khartoumers shall be our enemies forever
    North sudan shall remain our ultimate fighting fields forever

    I only trust SPLA
    I never trust the corrupt and weak leadership of SPLM

    To Me SPLA is the president Will keep
    fucking criminals off our country

    repondre message

  • 21 July 2012 11:26, by Land-of-Cush

    It is not first time for Sudan gov’t to bombard south Sudanese territory, killing civilians and denied it.

    South Sudan gov’t should take this case very seriously, because our civilians are always get kills from Sudan army

    repondre message

  • 21 July 2012 11:59, by Dhong Bang

    hey stupid guys who rush to blame south sudanese leadership, don’t you see how things work with khartoum. they deny it first and then accept and justifying it with Darfurian rebels pursuing. SS governement is keen to settle all issues but it is difficult with khartoum. what do you suggest? war is always a last resort not a priority for any solution

    repondre message

    • 21 July 2012 12:19, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

      Hey, how prepared are for the war? A war must be waged for conquest purpose. The money stolen should have gone to air defence capabilities to eliminate antinovs and their chinese made planes.

      repondre message

    • 21 July 2012 12:44, by zulu

      Hey Bang. In my Otuho language, Ibanga, abang means coward. So, today, you shut up coward as majority of south sudanese dont give a damn as to who is a brave individual. we will fuck these stupid brown idiots in sudan think they are out of sudan. we can do it without Kiir

      repondre message

      • 21 July 2012 13:45, by Dhong Bang

        zulu, it looks you are so serious but U are still vague. Mayardit is not working for his interest but for the interest of S. Sudanese Majority. Second, U and your majority can not do it without him. Attempt with your majority but I am sure you will be supprised that the majority you are claiming is with presidnent way of doing it, again, I am sure you even h’ve no plan for Ur majority to handle it

        repondre message

  • 21 July 2012 12:15, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

    are we starting to see the Islamic sword flames on South Sudan again? Since Khartoum is assure of support from their muslim brothers in Tunis, Cairo and Tripoli in preparation for big events on world stage in pursuit of Islamic zeal as Khartoum continues to misinform the world on events on ground. The world should prepare for the worst as fanatics take goverments in arab world capitals.

    repondre message

  • 21 July 2012 12:41, by Beneben Bai

    When SPLA withdrew from Panthou, I wished 90% of S. Sudanese population from both urban centres and villages of 10 states walk out to streets and at the same time march for only 2 to 3 hours to show the whole world that the issue is not a business of SPLM or SPLA, but a nationwide one. the positive political orientation is highly needed as it was situation during the referendum process

    repondre message

    • 21 July 2012 13:17, by katnyokarieu

      My friend beneni all were done,didn,t watched sstv, the protester in Awiel,Bentiu,warrap Juba ,Torit ,malakal and wau the street was mounted with huge number of south sudanese chanting the slogan saying no no no Ban-ki moon,but ur uncle kiir was unable respone clearly to mr moon.con...

      repondre message

      • 21 July 2012 14:00, by Dhong Bang

        katnyok, if Kiir is my uncle then he is also your uncle bcos of his age and above all he is our presidnet. Second, my intention was that it should have not been at the level you are saying. all S.S cities and towns streets should have been flooded with people at the same time all over the south. I mean big big gatherings (90%)and at the same time. peoples’ move is more effective than presindents’

        repondre message

  • 23 July 2012 15:46, by Anti Terror Anti

    IT’S NOT A SUPRISE FOR THEM TO BOMB, THAT IS THEIR DAILY BUNISINESS TO DEAL WITH NON-MUSLIM. ALWAY! AM SAYING ALWAY!! WHEN YOU GAVE MUHAMED A SWEET, THEN U THINK OF HIS HAND BACK, NOTGHING BUT MYSTROUS FEEDBACK WITH INTENTION TO TAKE ALL REST OF SWEETS REMAIN.....MR. PRESIDENT I CONDEMNED U FOR THIS BOMBARDMENT OF PROMISE THESE THUGS TEAM OF BHASHIR OUR THOUSANDS SSP. I DON’T KNOW RELI 4 WHAT. ..

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


On Abyei enough is enough 2013-06-18 05:01:47 By Deng Vanang June 17, 2013 - No one whether locally or internationally can still argue there is more hope to resolve Abyei stalemate peacefully. It has been everybody’s wish that dialogue could (...)

The arming of rebels in Sudan and South Sudan: what is the evidence? 2013-06-18 04:57:44 By Eric Reeves 17 June 2013 - News reporting in general, a great deal of analytic writing, and virtually all diplomatic pronouncements about military support for rebel groups—in South Sudan and (...)

Bashir’s decision, a material breach of the oil agreement 2013-06-16 06:21:14 By Justice Deng Biong June 15, 2013 - After its ratification by the National legislatures in both South Sudan and Sudan States, the Cooperation Agreement [CA] (Oil Agreement included) signed on (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Nuer Youth and Prophet Ngundeng’s Historical Society call for unity in South Sudan 2013-06-14 05:40:43 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Leadership of Nuer Youth and Ngundeng’s Historical Society, Juba, South Sudan June 12, 2013 - Due to the announcement made by President Bashir to abrogate the September, (...)

South Sudanese lawyers call for the respect of the rule of law and human rights 2013-06-14 01:01:36 South Sudan Law Society (SSLS) 7 June 2013 Lawyers in the Republic of South Sudan call for advocacy for the supremacy of the respect of the rule of Law, Human Rights in South Sudan South Sudan (...)

South Sudan civil society alliance ask to meet the president 2013-06-12 05:23:59 South Sudan Civil Society Alliance National Issues Discussed with the Presidential Legal Advisor and Appeal to meet the President June 7, 2013 Ladies and gentlemen of the press, today the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.