Home page | News    Wednesday 25 January 2012

AU mediators forward proposal on oil dispute between Sudan, South Sudan

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

January 24, 2012 (KHARTOUM) – The African Union High Level Panel (AUHIP) has put forward a new proposal aimed at enabling Sudan and South Sudan to resolve their dispute over oil, according to official Sudanese media.

JPEG - 27.9 kb
AUHIP chairman Thabo Mbeki

Sudan’s official news agency SUNA on Tuesday reported that the AUHIP, known as Mbeki Panel after its chairman and former South African president, has forwarded a twofold proposal to the Sudanese and South Sudanese delegates, negotiating under its mediation in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa.

The first part of the proposal, SUNA said, is pertinent to arrangements for a transitional period of 30 days during which South Sudan will continue to transport its oil through Sudan’s territories until an agreement on transit fees is reached.

Land-locked South Sudan last week decided to halt oil production in response to Khartoum’s sequestration of oil running through its territories on claims that Juba has not paid any fees since South Sudan seceded from Sudan on 9 July last year.

According to SUNA, the second part of the proposal suggests certain amounts of financial compensations to cover claims of arrears made since the date of South Sudan’s independence.

The news agency further said it learned that the delegates had received the proposals and promised to respond to it.

The AUHIP’s proposal represents the last chance to salvage the floundering round of talks which was originally scheduled to kick off on 17 January but hit a snag after South Sudan demanded that Khartoum pays compensation for the confiscated oil.

In an op-ed published on Tuesday by the New York Times, Alex de Wall, a prominent Sudan expert and an adviser to Mbeki, said that the new AUHIP proposals would “keep the oil flowing, stop the unilateral diversion of southern oil by the north, and provide enough funds to cushion the economic crisis in the north”.

De Wall noted that Sudan’s President Omer Al-Bashir and President Salva Kiir are due to meet on the margins of the IGAD summit in Addis Ababa on Friday.

As far as De Wall is concerned, “this is the last chance, not only for the two to snatch a deal on oil, but also to stop an escalation into a wider north-south war”.

“The two must step back from the brink,” he concluded.

The chairman of the AU commission, Jean Ping, also voiced support to the AUHIP proposal in a statement released on Monday.

Ping, who urged Sudan and South Sudan to refrain from unilateral actions over oil, said in the statement that the AUHIP proposal enjoys support from China, the biggest buyer of Sudanese oil, as well as other members of the international community, including the United States.

South Sudan took with it nearly 75 percent of the 500,000 barrels of oil the once united Sudan used to produce on daily basis, when it seceded in July last year as part of a 2005 peace deal that ended more than two decades of civil wars between the two sides.

Relations between the recently separated countries have been strained over mutual accusations of supporting rebel groups and failure to resolve post succession issues.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 25 January 07:27, by Lang

    At this point I believe only way our two countries would be successful in negotiations is if Jesus came back to earth and mediated.

    This is another complete failure Mbeki, give it up.

    Reply to this message

    • 25 January 07:37, by Lang

      "According to SUNA, the second part of the proposal suggests certain amounts of financial compensations to cover claims of arrears made since the date of South Sudan’s independence."

      So the stolen over $815,000,000 in oil isn’t enough compensation yet?

      Reply to this message

      • 25 January 08:42, by Darkangel

        Lang my small IQ brain of a 6 yr old. If daddy takes a cake from the man in the candy shop and doesnt pay for it, the candy man shop will get very angry and find a way to get his money. So son - stealing is bad and if you dont pay for something thats stealing too.

        NO you idiot Sudan is not paying ANY compensation to S Sudan. Go to court and let the judge throw the book at your idiot government.

        Reply to this message

        • 25 January 09:07, by Lang

          Worthless creature, as I said you’re not worthy enough for anyone to read your comments.

          Reply to this message

      • 25 January 21:15, by Frak Cho

        AU is hopeless to solve African issues but it serves well Arabs interest. When Sudan used all their military might in May 2011 on African people in Abyei, all the big international bodies condemned the attack but AU didn’t say anything. When South Sudan gain independent on 9th July 2011, many countries in the world including North Sudan were quick to recognise the independent, but AU was the last.

        Reply to this message

    • 25 January 07:41, by dengtaath

      Since we are still having contact with those thieves in the North, our problems will never stop growing every day. I urge South to look for oil pipeline alternative, let the North stay with their red sea. Thieves cannot be trusted, what relations can we get from thieves in nature. They stolen our oil for nearlly century but today when God give us our right, they still continue the same act,hell to

      Reply to this message

      • 25 January 08:55, by Mi diit

        Mbeki should not allow himself to be used by Khartoum as a tool for cheating South Sudan. When did he trust what Khartoum says. Khartoumers are caught by surprise when the shut down was announced and so want a way to steal more oil is operations resume. Mbeki, just get another job! It is too late. Don’t trust the thieves of Khartoum.

        Reply to this message

        • 25 January 10:48, by Ahmado

          Mi diit, i agree with you, Mbeki has hand supporting the Khartoum anyway indirect and south did realise but for me,i knew it since during the referandum comping he mostly advocate for unity which is against the people of south. Mbeki already fail to solve problem, whatdoes he wants people to discuss what?Arabs are immigrant and enemies let them go with their pipeline.

          Reply to this message

    • 25 January 11:24, by Acinitos

      I hope my Africa leaders should not wasted theirs time to pick dead horse in other to wake its up to run,Mbeki you need to take breake for yourself do not waste little energy you have reserve for your self.Good trial, but it is time for you to go home have rest. We respected your hard working.

      Reply to this message

    • 25 January 12:56, by Tamongali

      Mr. Lang,you read this part of the articl( The proposal enjoys support from China, the biggest buyer of Sudanese oil, as well as other members of the international community, including the United States).Since USA has blessed the proposal whether we like it or not it is going to happen. i challenge every one USA is every thing.

      Reply to this message

    • 25 January 12:59, by Tamongali

      Mr. Lang,you read this part of the articl( The proposal enjoys support from China, the biggest buyer of Sudanese oil, as well as other members of the international community, including the United States).Since USA has blessed the proposal whether we like it or not it is going to happen. i challenge every one USA is every thing.

      Reply to this message

  • 25 January 07:37, by Lorolokin

    Mbeki and Ping Pong should mind their business and leave South Sudanese alone. we know what you guys are playing, we are sick of all these Nation crime party (NCP) activities. We need peace.
    Mbeki has failed to bring peace to Sudans likewise Ping.

    Kinkak.

    Reply to this message

  • 25 January 07:52, by Madina Tonj

    I thought the AU will ask Khartoum to hand over everythings they took in oil of S,Sudan without permission from South Sudan knowledge. I don’t think that proposal will solve the complain on the South Sudan side. Khartoum by all account, they violate the South Sudan’s sovereitny and they need to take responsibility because they are still thinking like Sudan was one and that dream is not help

    Reply to this message

    • 25 January 08:32, by Mototo

      Dear Thabo Mbeki;

      Please you should go to North/Khartoum to bring back our stolen oil and money otherwise there will be no more peace deal or round table in Ethiopia or elsewhere even if you write Hundreds of thousand proposals.

      Your interference in the affairs of South Sudan is not fair and that why Bashir is stealing our oil, you are very marketable person who look after money.

      Young Pilot

      Reply to this message

  • 25 January 07:53, by mosa mel

    Too late, my advice to President Kiir is that, don’t accept that fake proposal. Our resources are not save any more in Sudan and Sudan never be friend as long Bashier is alive. Please don’t let the oil run to north Sudna again.

    Reply to this message

  • 25 January 07:53, by Peter Marko

    Do not cry yet, the money that Al-Bashier used to bribe you is gone forever. Forget it you, idiot. Did not you get it, you dummy, we have signed the contract with Kenya to transport our oil? We know that this trick from NCP to steal our oil. Get a life idiot. To hell with your proposal.

    Reply to this message

    • 25 January 08:19, by Darkangel

      I think your the idiot and dont understant politics. All this noise from South Sudan is to put pressure on Sudan to lower the fees - it has no alternative in the near future. It will take $3-4 Billion and 3-4 yrs to build a pipeline from Unity to Kenya - IDIOT. The 10 month one your fooled with is to ethiopia and guess what - no port in addiss. S. Sudan still has to pay $5 billion.

      Reply to this message

      • 25 January 08:23, by Darkangel

        Let me break it down for your simple minds:

        $5.4 Billion for compansation for oil lost revenue for 5 yrs, s Sudan has agreed to pay - IMF

        Sudan is asking for $1 billion for unpaid tansit fees since july. These are different issues.

        Then there is the matter of ongoing future fees for use of pipeline, export and fscilities. The GOSS is trying to mix it all up to avoid paying - instead make noise

        Reply to this message

        • 25 January 08:27, by Darkangel

          Like Jalaby said - your leaders are still up to thier old habits of getting on the bus, going for a ride and running away when its time to pay.

          The deal with Kenya MEANS NOTHING !! its a MoU - look it up. Neither Kenya or S.Sudan have the money or know how to build it. Companies will need to see if they will get their money first before starting an unfeasable idiotic plan with no guarantees.

          Reply to this message

          • 25 January 08:34, by Daniel Buolmawei

            That’s not your business whether we have money to pay companies who will construct the pipelines or not, and by the way, make sure we will not share debts.

            Reply to this message

            • 25 January 08:38, by Darkangel

              Im not saying its any of my business im just stating the facts like many analysts are about this issue. Blind idiot. use that small brain of yours instead of your hate filled, racist emotions.

              Reply to this message

          • 25 January 21:16, by Elijah B. Elkan

            Mr. Darkangel,
            The deal with Kenya means. the dooms for Khartoum economic, idiocy. Khartoum will lose if they refused to work with south Sudan, in the long run, and that’s fact. The idiots in Khartoum will feel the wrath of it’s citizens went price of food goes up. Khartoum is detached from reality of governing a country, and or having good neighbors. Bashir need to hang for killing it’s citizens.

            Reply to this message

  • 25 January 07:58, by Matiop Panchol

    Noooo pumping of oil until an agreement is reached and has Sudan paid the the stolen millions of dollars worth of oil. That oil might up being stolen.

    Reply to this message

  • 25 January 08:09, by Daniel Buolmawei

    I do not see any reason of continuing talks on oil unless our leaders are really foolish. We already decided that we will tight our bells until we build an alternative pipeline which its construction understanding is signed today. So no more moving back. We want to proceed to border demarcation, dual citizenship, and issue of Abyei. I do not want talk about sharing of $38 billion debts because----

    Reply to this message

    • 25 January 08:32, by Darkangel

      You obviously dont live in S Sudan Daniel. Getoff your lazy asylum pension not working and think of the poor peoples. There are no belts in South Sudan. Famine already hit. You dont have ANY alternative revenue to oil,i have no idea what your cowboy leader is talking about. So your suggesting the country live without money or beg for 4 yrs until anything comes up - smart move - lets wait. I will

      Reply to this message

      • 25 January 11:23, by Koang

        Dark-angel, do not open your big mouth here calming you understand every things, stupid! when did arabs become smart?what u understand best is to be rich by all-means(stealing, killing,dishonest,cunning and so on.)
        If you are smart enough, why don’t you solve social cases, like of Darfur and south kurdofan with out choas, you holigan!

        Reply to this message

  • 25 January 08:14, by Daniel Buolmawei

    Nothing was built in the south using such money accept the fact they were used to buy weapons for killing dearly loved ones. Who’s in his/her right mind in South Sudan can accept to pay for debts used purposely to kill their children, women and elderly or brother soldiers? Nobody, and I expect our leaders will never accept that, period. I will never share these debts.

    Reply to this message

    • 25 January 08:46, by Darkangel

      How about the 6 years since 2005 - what did the SPLM build out of the $10 Billion - NOTHING. Its still buying weapons and killing its people - worse ots giving it to the SPLM N to fight the war for it.

      Reply to this message

  • 25 January 08:29, by Tambura

    The oil negotiation should stop here, we should talk about Abyei first. We already shut down our oil, if northern agree on one dollar transit let them come out with it, before doing that they have to pay for the oil they stole.

    Reply to this message

    • 25 January 08:35, by Darkangel

      Sudan already stated - NO TALKS ON ABYEI. Until the South stop supporting rebels and sort out security arrangments. Pay its dues and demarcate the border.

      Again lets wait and see what you mighty SPLA is going to do. Your corrupt SPLM are already transfering whatever $ are left to other countries. Famine, War, Genocide and no government - S Sudan is a story out of hell - due GOSS & FAT PAGAN

      Reply to this message

      • 25 January 09:06, by Mi diit

        Darkangel,

        Don’t pretend that you are alright in Khartoum. Have you resolved the conflicts in Darfur, Nuba Mountains, Blue Nile, Eastern Sudan and the looming crisis inside Khartoum? Watch out buddy!

        Reply to this message

        • 25 January 09:15, by Darkangel

          If i was you i would worry of the looming genocide and havoc with people running around killing each other. Payam payong or whatever its called in the start. The only conflict ongoing is in Nuba Mountains because SPLM N SPLM and US want to flare it up. The Americans want to help the defeated SPLM N anyway 0 thats why they are crying so loud about famine. Americans make noise when up to something.

          Reply to this message

      • 25 January 20:39, by Elijah B. Elkan

        Mr. Darkangel, With all due respect sir, you’re a coward. Those who are born to rule use their real names, unlike you. Abyei is Dink country and it will always be, unless you want to be rule by Dinka people. The fake Arabs, most of them are inbreed, and are born liars, thief’s and cheaters. I am sorry, but you have extreme mental deficiency and a waste of space on this earth.

        Reply to this message

    • 25 January 10:32, by mosa mel

      Tambura
      Even if Sudan agree on one dollar, still nothing stop their behaviors of stealing. We don’t need any deal with them any more. They are criminal and devil. We don’t need relation with them. They are nothing but virus.

      Reply to this message

  • 25 January 09:12, by kuac Agol

    The AUHIP is actually coming with the proposal that will bring more confusion to South Sudan government and renew null and void contract on oil .

    They should removed the agenda from their proposal instead of wasting their time and change it with something soundful and instrumental to us.

    Mbeki waste time, travell all the way from south africa with the proposal which is not soundful.

    Reply to this message

  • 25 January 09:12, by Sudan virus

    AU wants buy time for Bashir to continue Loot our oil!!!!!!!!!!

    No need for oil talks any more.

    Reply to this message

  • 25 January 10:06, by Ahmado

    Khartoum are just playing a game south sudan should not accept to use the pipeline of khartoum because they are not friendly with south sudan. in my view south sudan should continue build theirs and leave one of khartoum so that to avoid conflicts, because khartoum take it as advantage to create noise for south sudan.this Arabs should not deceive us again decision already made.

    Reply to this message

  • 25 January 11:13, by Lokeji

    I don’t know why always, Mbeki and his friend Jean ping wants to portray south sudan as a wait party in the negotiation by turning around to beg the khartoum government. we are not wait but rather ready to confront the north and get whatever we want from them.Mbeki have to close this chapter, we are tire of damn shit negotiations, we have a lot of issues that deserve our attention.

    Reply to this message

  • 25 January 12:53, by Monster

    Please Mbeki, you seems to be behind the current development in RSS, let me them you that we have halted the oil production already to stop making al Bashir Mafia rich of our resource

    Reply to this message

    • 25 January 14:54, by Dinka Dominated SPLA/M

      Ahaha what a names in this forum?
      Man’ people are really trying to compete to match my political name,

      JONG-JONG DOG
      Monster and mony more, very funy names indeed,

      people are funny every day,

      Reply to this message

  • 25 January 17:13, by Padiet Deng Alony

    Ping, who urged Sudan and South Sudan to refrain from unilateral actions over oil, said in the statement that the AUHIP proposal enjoys support from China, the biggest buyer of Sudanese oil, as well as other members of the international community, including the United States

    China still saying the biggest buyer of Sudanese oil.

    Is not sudanese oil mr ping now,it is South Sudanese oil.

    Reply to this message

  • 25 January 17:28, by Padiet Deng Alony

    If South Sudan leaderships give up their decision of shutting down the oil. then the people of South Sudan will loose trust on them in the future. that will also categorise them as leaders that lack the following characteristics of leadership:

    not courageous

    undecisive leaders

    No more going back for oil negotiation with north sudan, since that chapter is over.

    Reply to this message

  • 25 January 17:48, by Jong Anthony

    what we want is just the compensation of our stolen oil but going back to oil negotiation is of no important to South Sudan at the movement

    Reply to this message

  • 26 January 15:09, by Majak Mawien

    S.Sudan and North Sudan dispute over oil is beyond AUHIP capacity. There is no need of new proposal for resolving this issues. It was shutdown and that is all. Who need what and from who? Is oil from where? Not S.Sudan. proposal would have aimed at enabling Khartoum paid for oil it has looted.

    Reply to this message

Reply to this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


South Sudan after Paanthou crisis 2012-05-14 01:35:00 By Steve Paterno May 13, 2012 — Diplomatically, when the Paanthou crisis occurred, South Sudan found itself unprepared and underrepresented in the diplomatic front. The diplomatic ferocity of its (...)

Sudan and South Sudan: Where are they heading? 2012-05-12 05:59:20 By Luka Biong Deng May 11, 2012 — When the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) was signed in 2005, the Sudanese and the international community were relieved as Sudan would be put on the path of (...)

Khartoum and the language of war: Who’s really listening? 2012-05-12 05:31:52 By Eric Reeves May 11, 2012 — Every day it becomes clearer that unless Juba buckles before Khartoum's extortionate demands, on a range of issues, then the regime will settle matters (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


AMNESTY: HEALTH CONCERNS FOR DETAINED ACTIVIST 2012-05-11 20:18:33 Amnesty International Health Concerns For Detained Activist - Bushra Gammar Hussein Rahma 11 May 2012 More than ten months after his arrest, Sudanese activist Bushra Gamar Hussein Rahma (...)

Reasons behind the defection of Maj. Gen. James Duit Yiech 2012-05-09 06:06:32 Joint Statement of SSDF, NDF, SSLA and SSDA Date: 07/05/2012 The leadership of South Sudan revolutionary forces would like to clarify to the world the reasons behind the defection of Maj. Gen. (...)

Al-Shabaab and Abdulkadir Hussein Mohamed "Jahweyn" among the predators of freedom of information 2012-05-03 14:46:03 Reporters Without Borders Press release - World Press Freedom Day 3 May 2012 SOMALIA Al-Shabaab and Abdulkadir Hussein Mohamed "Jahweyn" among the predators of freedom of information Read the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2012 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.